Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

I had heard rumblings about this from some plugged-in parents when Terry Nagel endorsed Proposition 2, but the word circulated late–or so I thought.  The Daily Journal is reporting that the word came later than I thought–the Day After The Election??

The passage of Proposition 2 in November was heralded by supporters for its creation of a state rainy day fund, but language within capping reserves for individual school districts in certain years is generating concern among administrators who contend the money held there helps get through periods of uncertainty.

“Each school district is developing their own Local Control Accountability Plan and within that plan that school district based on their student population develops appropriate goals to realize the best academic outcomes for those kids and that is going to be different from school district to school district,” said Nancy Magee, administrator for board support and community relations at the San Mateo County Office of Education. “In San Mateo County, we still have basic aid school districts funded mostly by property taxes and others are funded through the state and those amounts differ greatly. Economic uncertainty exists for everyone and based on types of academic programs and type of budget they’re working within, it’s important for each school district to decide what their level of reserve should be when they hit not even economic uncertainty, but any type of uncertainty in their programs.”

County Superintendent Anne Campbell and the San Mateo County Board of Education issued a joint statement opposing the cap on district reserves on Nov. 5, the day after the measure was approved by California voters.

So what will be the impact on B'game schools?

For the San Mateo Union High School District, this reserve cap is also bad news for the district that has about a 12 percent reserve. Basic aid school districts, funded by local property taxes, have higher than normal reserves because of the volatility of its revenue, Liz McManus, deputy superintendent of business services, previously said.

“My understanding is there’s going to be modifications to the language in January (2015),” McManus said. “It’s probably not the best time to be reducing reserves.”

Sounds ominous.

Posted in , ,

6 responses to “Prop. 2 – Now They Tell Us?”

  1. dtn

    When will people understand that Nagel is out for Nagel and no one else? The school parents have been Grubered–they are ignorant and Nagel likes it that way. It is a very sad situation but not at all different from the rest of the Nagel agenda–kissing butt to move up in the county. The only problem is she is incompetent on real problems.

  2. Would anyone give money to any cause where you knew over 90% of it went to support administration and not the root cause you were trying to help?
    Then why in the world would you dump more money into the schools systems.
    We love supporting schools, students and teachers…not Unions and blatant waste.
    http://www.caltax.org/waste/waste_education

  3. Too many people want something for nothing.

    Timothy,
    And, most of the changes to state-run school districts in recent years have just been more ‘wealth redistribution’. The Local Control brand is really a red herring designed to hide the fact that more of your money is being taken away and being given to other families and to other workers.
    Unfortunately, it’s already been proven many times that a lack of funding in poor areas, is not the cause nor the solution for achievement for the students – whether academic, athletic, fine arts, or other extracurriculars.
    The biggest positive impact comes from an improvement of “The Culture”.
    This is true in Fortune 50 to 500 companies, it’s true in Non Profits, it’s true in faith-based groups, it’s true in school organizations, it’s true in government organizations.
    Fortunately, the parents and the teachers in Burlingame and some of the other Peninsula towns like Millbrae, Belmont, San Carlos, Menlo Park, Atherton, Palo Alto, Woodside, Mountain View, etc deliver Cultures to the students which encourage diligent hard work and healthy living as opposed to the glorification of drug dealing, the glorification of violence and the disrespect of women, the glorification of laziness, the glorification of not taking care of your children, demonizing people of other races for your problems, the forgotten mantra of love thy neighbor and do unto others. In areas like EPA, many people are either on drugs all the time, or selling drugs all the time, or trying to scam either other and the government as much as possible.
    The weak culture is a break down of the family and of family values, and leaders like Jessie Jackson and Oprah, and Ben Carson would agree.
    My family has donated thousands of dollars and thousands of hours to help schools. We tutor our children everyday, and they’re in the gifted and talented programs. Ultimately your family and each parent needs to step up and take responsibility for their children and for their family’s well-being, and it’s a daily, diligent, journey.
    Too many people want something for nothing.

  4. Timothy hooker

    Great points. Seems like it all starts at home.
    thanks for comments.

  5. wealth redistribution

    Caps are wealth redistribution.
    That means the gov’t forcibly takes your money and the money of your neighbor’s and gives it to other families if they make less money.
    “Latinos now make up a majority of California schoolchildren…”
    “But investing more in their future meant directing money away from more affluent, suburban districts.”
    “‘The rich districts lost out on this,’ says Thad Kousser, a political scientist at the University of California, San Diego. ‘The new California electorate — all these Latinos now finally showing up at the polls — brought Jerry Brown victory. This is the first concrete payoff for that electorate.’”
    http://www.npr.org/2013/08/19/212294111/california-upends-school-funding-to-give-poor-kids-a-boost
    The current power structure allows thousands of immigrants to break the law by illegally entering our country, then over time that group becomes the largest groups, and actively takes your money and enacts laws that give them special privileges vs. you.
    It’s not about race, it’s about our elected officials and law enforcement officers choosing to not enforce the existing laws and then taking more of your family’s money as a result.
    You voted for it.

  6. the proper hotline for public corruption

    To report corruption among government workers, managers or elected officials, please call this FBI San Francisco Bay Area “Public Corruption” Hotline:
    San Fran., CA: (800) 376-5991
    Reporting public corruption to local police or to that same gov’t organization is not an effective way to make sure that it gets addressed.
    Think it doesn’t happen in a nice suburb?
    Actually, it’s The FBI’s #1 priority.
    Question: Why is public corruption so high on the FBI’s list of investigative priorities?
    Answer: Because of its impact. Corrupt public officials undermine our country’s national security, our overall safety, the public trust, and confidence in the U.S. government, wasting billions of dollars along the way. This corruption can tarnish virtually every aspect of society. For example, a border official might take a bribe, knowingly or unknowingly letting in a truck containing weapons of mass destruction. Or corrupt state legislators could cast deciding votes on a bill providing funding or other benefits to a company for the wrong reasons. Or at the local level, a building inspector might be paid to overlook some bad wiring, which could cause a deadly fire down the road.
    Learn more details of Public Corruption:
    http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2010/march/corruption_032610
    Or, if you want to speak with a trustworthy contact about other major crimes, please just call the main number.
    FBI San Francisco
    450 Golden Gate Avenue, 13th Floor
    San Francisco, CA 94102-9523
    Phone: (415) 553-7400
    E-mail: san.francisco@ic.fbi.gov

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading