Category: SFO Airport

  • I worry that our beloved local paper, the San Mateo Daily Journal (the “DJ”), is susceptible to the nonsense that makes the SF Chronicle the “Comicle”. Uncritical thinking. Poor story selection. Intentional or unintentional omissions. Tertiary sources. There are so many ways to screw up. Thursday was an example. The front page, above-the-fold piece with accompanying photo was headlined “Organizers protest detainment facility at SFO”. The very first sentence reads “Roughly a dozen protesters…..” Stop right there. The line at Walgreen’s pharmacy window after the lunch break has more than a dozen people in it. If it’s a slow news day, just stick with whatever the AP feeds you. Twelve people posing for a photo op is sad.

    Then we are treated to some rando protester from some rando organization that probably only has these dozen people in it telling us that if “people knew they would not be pleased”. He has no idea what people would think except for me–I think he’s an idiot. My worry, noted above, is exacerbated when our intrepid local reporter then starts regurgitating Comicle reporting from three weeks ago. Ugh. Do better.

  • Last Friday was International Socialists Day aka May Day. One would expect some SF politicians to participate in the random protest here or there because, well, that’s what they do. But would one expect them to protest themselves? Isn’t that peak stupidity/hypocrisy? Apparently understanding that the City and County of SF own and operate SFO airport was above their pay grade. The Chronicle reports

    A May Day protest by airport service workers briefly shut down the departure-level roadway at San Francisco International Airport’s international terminal Friday, diverting traffic as demonstrators rallied over a wage dispute and broader labor concerns.

    Several San Francisco elected officials were arrested after demonstrators blocked the roadway to the international terminal, including Board of Supervisors President Rafael Mandelman, Supervisor Connie Chan and former Supervisor Jane Kim. State Sen. Josh Becker, who represents San Mateo County and part of Santa Clara County, was also arrested.

    “San Francisco airport is the people’s airport,” Chan told supporters before her arrest. “We know our workers deserve fair pay, a fair contract, health care and benefits. We’re demanding that the workers get that benefits and fair pay right now.”

    Like I said, plenty of things are apparently above Connie Chan’s pay grade even as she runs for Congress, but what about our own state senator Josh Becker? What exactly caused him to feel it was a good idea to disrupt traffic at SFO while his constituents were trying to catch a flight? Has he taken care of the insurance crisis, the energy and gas prices, water security, and the state’s budget crisis so airport salaries move to the top of the list?

    And in the ultimate finger to her constituents, SF Supe Jackie Fielder who is supposedly on “medical leave” and has not been doing her job as a supervisor for several months was photographed at the protest. You are judged by the company you keep, senator.

  • The news that SFO will be shutting down runways 1Left and 1Right should give us, the poor neighbors to the airport, some summer reprieve from take-off back blast noise. 1L and 1R are the short ones that go out towards the East Bay and contribute most of the noise that washes over B’game during inversion layers. The Comicle notes

    Ten percent of all flights at San Francisco International Airport could face delays amid a massive runway rehabilitation project that begins next month and could last into November.

    Crews are set to close Runway 1 Right on March 30 to repave the asphalt and realign nearby taxiways, shifting all takeoffs and landings to runways 28 Left and 28 Right. Runway 1 Left, which borders the construction zone, would be converted into a temporary taxiway to ease bottlenecks before planes depart.

    SFO’s director of project management, Claudia Luquin, described the $200 million repaving and excavation work as “fast-paced,” and “highly sensitive” during a recent airport commission meeting. Overall, she said, it will help keep the airport in a state of good repair and improve safety.

    We discussed the sinking runways and sea walls needed to counter “sea level rise” back in December 2023 here along with proposed legislation about the noise that has gone…..nowhere since. But at least we get “emergency townhall meetings” about ICE and glossy mailers about “affordability”.

  • The Chronicle’s local sightseeing tour guide/reporter, Peter Hartlaub, who grew up in B’game journeyed back to our little burg for a piece on Coyote Point. He has some fun little quips that we can enjoy here or you can click through for the whole article. It sounds like he grew up in Lyon-Hoag.

    Coyote Point’s geography is similar to other Bay Area parks, a 670-acre shoreline promontory with a tree-covered hill, laid out a lot like Oyster Bay Regional Shoreline in San Leandro and the East Bay’s Albany Bulb. But the overall vibes are one of a kind, with the airplanes, massive picnic areas, tide pools, a colorful playground, a hidden zoo, oh, and bursts of audible gunfire.

    It’s also a lesson for me: How the Bay Area things we grew up with that once felt routine, seem wild and mystical when you return with perspective. I was raised in Burlingame six blocks from Coyote Point, and thought this strange and versatile park was the norm. Biking through the entire thing for the first time in decades, I’m struck by how close I once lived to an open space unicorn.

    From (Caltrain) I bike slowly east through a town I barely recognize, retracing most of my old 1980s Chronicle paper route and passing my childhood home — bought by my parents for $35,000 in 1970 — now mostly unrecognizable after a recent modern makeover.

    After recapping the landfill in the 1880s that connected the island to the shoreline and the Pacific City fiasco, he mentions another long-gone landmark that we all miss as he bikes up the hill

    I power up the first hill and sadly find no sign of the Castaway, a tiki-themed fancy restaurant with airport views, where we gathered for graduations and Mother’s Day. (It was bulldozed in 2007.)

    As I’m leaving, I marvel at how much better this went than I feared. So much of my middle-class childhood on the Peninsula — every movie theater, drive-in, record store and favorite sandwich spot — has been swallowed by Silicon Valley. But this park is both preserved and objectively better than when I visited as a kid.

    I bike back through my old neighborhood slowly, wishing I had a few more Chronicles to deliver. Nostalgia is a powerful drug. Especially when it’s a half-century later and a special place still has some magic left.

    Let’s see if we can keep as much of “the magic” as possible. It’s very tough to do, but as some city council woman said more than once, “You’ll miss it when it’s gone”.

  • The Palo Alto Daily Post continues to lead the way in local news coverage of the harder-hitting variety. Today’s edition was no exception with their headline “City fights expansion of airport“. At first, I thought the San Carlos airport was seeking some expansion approvals, but no–Paly is going after SFO! Apparently SFO wants to add a new terminal and up to 13 new gates and thinks they have done a proper EIR. News to me. Have we heard any of this from the city of B’game? Any e-newsletters from Papan? Is Becker “creating change” in our dealings with SF? Nada. Paly has lawyered up via a January 23rd letter to the SF Supes. Their hot button is final approach noise, but we are sympatico about the general noise issue. Is there a Go Fund Me page that our city council can contribute to?

    Click on the SFO Airport Voice category on the right frame here. You will see that SFO is a crappy neighbor and like most crappy neighbors, just doesn’t care. “We bring a lot of money to SF and the Bay Area economy so you suburban plebes can just deal with the runway noise and loss of sleep”. 13 more gates? Too bad. 3 am engine testing? Gotta do it to keep the money flowing. I hope the Concerned Residents of Palo Alto keep the pressure up. Somebody has to.

  • After seeing multiple Waymo's in my neighborhood for a month or more I decided it was time to give it a try.  I actually like to drive especially with my manual transmission cars.  It's a control thing and that ain't Waymo.  But we were four and planned on having a nice dinner in Millbrae, so I hailed one.  It was prompt arriving when it said it would, but missing the pick-up location by four addresses–so we walked over to it since you can't wave at it.  Out to ECR, left turn and headed north it was very careful and direct.  It changed lanes oddly for no apparent reason although my friend noted maybe its suspension sensor guided it away from the right lanes that SamTrans and trucks have turned into a used-up mine field.  $18 seemed about right–no need to tip the driver.

    Drop-off was smooth and after dinner the pick-up was also smooth–like a Lyft.  Then the fun started.  Instead of going 75 feet, turning right on ECR and heading for B'game it made an inexplicable turn back to the Millbrae neighborhoods.  It made another five inexplicable turns on tight residential streets until finally getting to ECR.  Being in good moods we laughed at it.  Then the drop-off (supposedly back where we started) went South as they say.  It turned left instead of right and stopped several blocks from home on the other side of ECR. That was it.  Get out.  Live customer support came on the speaker promptly and indicated the drop-off was outside the service area!  She didn't know what to say when I told her it picked us up there two hours ago, but the fare was waived.  Very odd.

    Today's announcement that Waymo is cleared to start driver-assisted service into SFO made me think that one should leave plenty of time since a random walk through the neighborhood could add fifteen minutes to the trip.  I will improve, it's just not quite there yet.  Here's me on ECR.

    Waymo Joe_jpg

  • As we again reenter the ridiculousness of Standard Time tonight, the Merc has an article on sleep deprivation by county and towns in the Bay Area.  The headline has an Oakland ZIP code as the most sleep deprived, and the chart shows San Mateo County is the least sleep deprived county (i.e. averaging less than seven hours per night).  Solano County is the most sleep deprived at 38.1% and San Mateo County the least at 28.7%.

    Pulling the covers back a bit, the San Mateo County figure is lulled by Portola Valley at 23.2%.  The other rural towns are also quieter and sleep more.  Dear old B'game is a little better than the county average at 26%, but that may include our shared ZIP code sister, H'borough.  I am skeptical about the metric because the duration of sleep is only part of the story.  When weather conditions are just right–meaning just wrong for sleep–the jet backblast from SFO take-offs may not fully wake you up, but you're not in REM either.  It might also be making us…a bit heavier than need be.

    The "Fall back" is not as bad as the "Spring forward", but be careful out there as either change is associated with distracted driving, etc.  We all voted to stay on Daylight Savings time, but the Sacramento gang and Gavin haven't moved on making the change.  Add this to the "Sacramento Stupidity" category.

  • Most of you probably are not up at 1:30 am or 2am, but I am–usually by choice.  The last three nights have had very bad runway backblast noise at that hour.  Between the Asia-Pac passenger and freight flights and US flights deadheading back east for the morning rush, it can get loud.  How loud?  Recall I had the airport put a temporary noise monitor in my yard for a couple weeks back in 2019 and the results were documented here.  30-50 second bursts of 65-68 dB were common.  How do we know that's too loud?  Because a recent academic study described here notes

    A new study from researchers at the Boston University School of Public Health and Oregon State University (OSU) found that people who were exposed to aircraft noise levels at 45 decibels or more were more likely to have higher self-reported body mass index (BMI)—an indicator of general obesity, which can lead to cardiometabolic diseases, as well as a range of other health issues. A noise level of 45 decibels (dB) is just above the hushed tones of a library (40 dB) and quieter than a typical conversation at home (50 dB).

    The researchers concluded that the highest BMI measures were linked to aircraft noise levels at 55 dB or above. Noise exposure at 45 dB or above was also associated with having higher BMI in middle to late adulthood from early adulthood.

    In a 2023 study, Peters found aircraft noise—even as low as 45 db—increased the risk of sleeping less than seven hours a night. She notes that the distance someone could experience 45 dB of aircraft noise could reach out as far as 22 miles from a major airport.

    Almost all of B'game is within about 4 miles of the airport with runways 1Left and 1Right pointed right away from us directing the engine run-up noise right at us.  The attempts to get some compensation for home noise improvements (i.e. great windows) and the loss of sleep/enjoyment of our properties went nowhere unless someone owned their home before 1980!  When Jackie Speier was in Congress, she made some attempts to change the law, but those haven't gone anywhere either.

    Perhaps soon-to-be County supe Jackie Speier will light a fire under the County to take action against the City and County of SF who own and operate the airport.  It would have a lot more positive health impact than outlawing gas barbeques and stoves.  In the meantime, those extra pounds around our middles may not be entirely our fault–or Salt & Straw's or Pizza My Heart's fault.  "The airport made me do it".  Hat tip, Flip Wilson. 

  • A regular Voice reader and correspondent, Peter Garrison, has been on the case this week about Korean Air KAL 214 spewing 88-91 decibels over B'game and Hillsborough at 2:55 am.  It must be pretty important Korean freight for their 747 to wake up 100's (1000's?) of people.  One can only imagine.

    I'm hoping whichever candidate takes over Dave Pine's County Supervisor seat in November will Do Something Serious about the runway backblast and late night overflight noise.  Jackie Speier put some effort into the problem with Congressional legislation that needed more of a push as noted here.  I've seen Ann Schneider address the noise issue at the Airport Roundtable Ground Noise subcommittee a couple times.  She's a bit of a scatter shot but understands the problem and with some good technical and legislative guidance might make progress.  Either one of them would be more focused than the Supe who thinks either the Gazan Palestinians or the Israelis give a rat's ass about what she or San Mateo County, CA thinks.  Looking at you Noelia Corzo–dullest knife in the drawer. 

    Here's the latest bit of aggravating noise (decibel) data on KAL 214.  If you played your car speakers at the level on ECR at 2:55 am you would be arrested.

    Korean Air flight path

     

  • Eighteen months ago, we watched with arms-length fascination as driverless robotaxis hit the streets of San Francisco.  We asked "What could go wrong?" here.  Cruise has since retracted its service in SF and elsewhere after a grisly accident where its robotaxi was the second vehicle to hit a pedestrian.  Now Waymo is ready to come down the Peninsula as reported by the Chronicle.  The DMV is apparently game:

    The company leading the robotaxi race wants to expand driverless ride-hailing to Los Angeles and 22 Bay Area cities in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties — even as San Francisco is suing to rein in its expansion.  Last Friday, Mountain View-based Waymo applied to the PUC, which regulates commercial robotaxi service in California, to expand its paid driverless operations to a swath of Peninsula cities including Sunnyvale, Palo Alto, Mountain View and San Mateo, as well as much of Los Angeles County.

    Another state regulator, the Department of Motor Vehicles, gave Waymo approval on Jan. 11 to operate on highways and city streets in a service area spanning San Francisco to Sunnyvale, according to the company’s PUC application.

    One of the juiciest operating permits would be to and from SFO

    San Francisco International Airport officials confirmed last year that Waymo sought permission to map roads in and surrounding the airport as it seeks to eventually bring its driverless ride-hailing service to the region’s busiest airport.

    “I’m being very candid and straightforward about it — I’m using that as an opportunity to try to force a more collaborative relationship with Waymo,” Aaron Peskin, president of the Board of Supervisors, told the Chronicle in November. “And if they take us up on it, great. And if they don’t, then I’m going to have the Board of Supervisors keep them off the airport until they do.”

    Let's not let EssEff take complete control.  B'game should be asking questions and seeking proof that Waymo can navigate odd roundabouts and weird lane patterns like California Dr.  What is the algorithm like regarding pedestrians in (and now legally outside of) crosswalks.  One hears that robotaxis are obeying traffic laws more than HV (human-driven vehicles), but how do they react to crazy drivers breaking the law by going around cautious robos?  If your destination is a building on El Camino, where will Waymo park to disembark?  Will they just add to the Amazon, UPS and DHL mess we have now on ECR?  All worthwhile questions for our leadership to ask.  It may not be as sexy as sea-level rise in 2050, but it's still important.

The Burlingame Voice

Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026