Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

The news that council member Michael Brownrigg will not seek re-election in the Fall was made official this week. Voice readers were not surprised as we wrote that more than a month ago, when Michael told me he would make the announcement at the April 6th city council meeting as noted here on the Town Square post. Apparently, that didn’t happen until now as the Daily Journal picked it up yesterday and is highlighting two candidates who will seek the D3 seat. At least we will have one race. We shall see if anyone files to compete with Andrea Pappajohn (D1) or Peter Stevenson (D5) who are both up for re-election on Nov. 3rd.

The two D3 candidates, Jen Faber and Howard Wettan, are starting earlier than usual driven by the open seat. I know both candidates having met with both one-on-one for more than an hour to talk over local issues as they explored running. Jen Faber and her work with BCE was profiled here and I didn’t write up Howard after we met. Here are a few early thoughts on an early-starting race:

The move to Five Little Districts we discussed in 2021 here continue to do city governance no favors. In a small city of a shade over 30,000 people, it makes no sense to carve it up in little pieces. First, it takes away 4 of the 5 votes residents used to have. As we are seeing this time around, it also diminishes good candidates’ opportunities to win a seat. Jen and Howard are both strong candidates and, in my opinion, would be uber competitive in a city-wide race against the incumbents up for re-election. But they are corralled into competing just against each other.

In the meantime, it is quite possible we will have no competitive election in one or both of D1 and D5. Is there really that much difference in issues between little districts? Does anyone feel better represented? I know locals who kind of pay attention and still don’t know who “their” councilmember is. Having to vote every four years instead of every two doesn’t help voter engagement. Nor does it do much for candidate engagement–nobody is knocking on doors outside of their little district.

Both D3 candidates are strong. Both are committed to B’game. Both have assembled solid endorsements. Both will be sufficiently funded (about the only benefit of little districts is the savings on postage). We shall see how the candidate forums play out and whether people see a clear issues-based choice or vote on person knowledge. At least we will have one race.

P.S. Michael was appointed to the Planning Commission in 2001–more like 25 years of service, not 16. 

Posted in , ,

3 responses to “City Council: At least District 3 will be competitive”

  1. Bernal Flats

    Thank you. I don’t know Howard Wettan but I know Jen Faber is a workhorse. I’ll keep an open mind as they provide details on their thinking about how the town should evolve.

  2. Man Up

    What has Pappajohn done in all this time on council. Or Thayer for that matter. They are rubber stamps.

  3. Grace

    Man Up, don’t forget Peter. Just be thankful they are not yet confident nor knowledgeable enough to go rogue. Thayer was elected with the help of cop hating, single family neighborhood destroying radicals from outside Burlingame and eventually she will have to pay them back if she wants to continue receiving their support. Have you noticed that they always seem to wait to see Donna’s position on issues before speaking up? For example, at the Sept 15, 2025 meeting, when Michael suggested closing the meeting on behalf of Charlie Kirk, Peter agreed with him. Then when Donna said she was offended because she is a women (LOL) without any concrete facts for opposition, Peter changed his mind and the motion was shot down. Another example, but I can’t remember the item-there was something on the agenda that Donna was not happy about. I think she said something to the effect that it was only agendized because one outside influence pushed a council member to put it on the agenda and thus, it was tabled. We do not have an independent city council; we have a queen.

    BTW, wouldn’t it be nice if we had a real debate or question and answer session for the candidates? Not the typical fluff questions by the League of Women Voters. I have my list ready since it’s my district.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading