Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Even with Gov. “Kneepads” Newsom termed out of Sacramento and travelling the world to lay the groundwork for a presidential run, the race for governor has been a total yawn so far. Katie “Get out of my f*^%king shot” Porter is toast. As Randy Wong said today on the John Phillips Show (12-3pm 810am KSFO), “people either don’t know who Tom Steyer is or really don’t like him” regardless of how many expensive commercials he runs during Warriors games. The rest are pretty much ho-hum at best. The saddest is Tony Thurmond, state superindendent of public instruction, which would be the biggest example of the Peter Principle in history.

But the news this morning that San Jose major Matt Mahan’s wife gave him to go ahead to jump into the race, as he relayed in an interview with Ashley Zavala of KCRA Sacramento, has invigorated the race to the June 2nd primary. Per the SF Standard:

But Mahan does have some aces to play: He has won the ardor of some of California’s technology crowd, including Y Combinator leader Garry Tan and entrepreneur Jesse Tinsley. That cohort alone could provide the millions needed to propel him to Sacramento. He has also carved out a moderate, party-bucking lane on homelessness and criminal justice (e.g. a big Prop 36 supporter) that a large swath of voters might find appealing, as Democrats continue their soul-searching after the 2024 election. And in a political environment where bucking the status quo is in vogue, Mahan has been quick to criticize the state’s leadership, which could excite both disaffected voters and well-heeled donors.

As mayor, Mahan has pushed for stricter rules on unsheltered homelessness, is an advocate for interim shelter sites, and often rails against state regulations he says stymie housing production. He is considered an ally to business interests, and, like San Francisco’s mayor, has largely stayed out of national political conversations. He has instead argued that his energy should be spent on combating local issues. His term in San Jose runs until 2028, after he handily won reelection in 2024.

A reasonable person could ask, “why would you want the job?” when the next governor will inherit budget deficits as far as the eye can see–or passed it, if (when) the stock market hits its next speed bump. The emerging story is the public service unions and the health care unions with their “billionaire tax” vs. the “center-lane” candidate who can line up enough millions to level the advertising playing field. And if Mahan loses, he still has a job for two more years. Popcorn anyone?

Posted in , , , ,

6 responses to “Mahan: From San Jose to Sacramento?”

  1. Phinancier

    California obtained millions in federal funds to cover phone and internet service for 94,000 dead people, a new report from the Federal Communications Commission revealed. “Gavin Newsom’s California was by far the worst offender of these opt-out states,” FCC Chair Brendan Carr wrote on X, referencing states that oversaw the program’s verification process for recipients. He said that the FCC has revoked the state’s authority to manage verification.

    Newsom’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Of the 116,808 deceased individuals in opt-out states, roughly two-thirds (77,446) were enrolled after their deaths, the report stated. A further 19% (22,588) may have died before enrollment, while 15% (16,774) were confirmed dead prior to being claimed. The FCC said this clearly demonstrates “fraudulent conduct” involving enrollments of individuals who had already died.

  2. Grace

    Mahan needs to answer a few questions such as why he is subsidizing market rate developers by reducing the impact fees. He claims it’s necessary because the projects don’t “pencil out.” So, he thinks it’s a good idea to push the burden for infrastructure onto the taxpayer. No thanks.

  3. Joe

    Good point. I have also heard Mahan voted in favor of high-cost rail while on the SJ city council, but I cannot recall that council needing to vote on anything HSR related. His comment that he would “hold his nose and vote for Prop. 50” was a bit spineless as well.

    In other news, SF Comicle reporter Sophia Bollag has been tracking Newsom’s social media posts for some time. It’s been mostly fawning coverage about how aggressive Newsom in “pushing back” on Trump. She never gets around to noting that Newsom gets ratioed in 2027 in the comments on X that recite all of his personal and political failures.

    But today, the tone changed a bit with a piece title” “From kneepads to Grindr, Newsom’s latest Trump-inspired insults have gotten downright sexual.” It’s here: https://www.sfchronicle.com/politics/article/newsom-trump-joke-president-21321010.php

    There are some gems as Sophia tries to walk the line on whether Newsom is helping or hindering his presidential aspirations. Here are a couple:

    When House Speaker Mike Johnson gloated on social media earlier this month about people leaving California, Newsom’s press office responded with: “Hey Mike — nice of you to get off your knees to post! Are you sore?”

    The next day, right-wing commentator Benny Johnson announced he was coming to the state to investigate fraud. The account fired off another risqué retort. “We’ll make sure Grindr servers are ready,” Newsom’s office replied, referencing a gay hookup app.

    During one interview, Newsom criticized Republicans who flipped from criticizing Trump to embracing him, including Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who has long denied rumors he is gay.
    “Lindsey Graham — I mean, speaking of the kneepads,” Newsom said, prompting giggles from the audience. “I’m sorry. This is tough stuff.”

    None of the kneepad jokes, Newsom spokesperson Izzy Gardon insists, are intended to be sexual.

    “It’s about people bending the knee to Trump and kowtowing,” he said. “It’s not about a blow job.”

    But a lot of people — from online commentators who reply to Newsom’s posts to scholars who study political rhetoric — aren’t buying that.

    “Bringing up kneepads?” said Monika McDermott, a professor of political science at Fordham University who studies the role of masculinity in politics. “We all know the implications of what that means.”

    Politicians attacking each other’s masculinity is not new, McDermott said, but the crudeness is.

    “I think he’s making a huge mistake,” she said of Newsom. “I think Democrats were championing him for a while because he was trolling Trump in the way Trump liked to troll other people … and now it’s taken such a hideous turn that I can’t imagine there won’t be a backlash, at least among the more liberal parts of the Democratic base.”

    “It’s amazing to me that someone who has the advisers that Newsom has and the potential political career Newsom has would make such a mistake,” she said.
    —————————-
    Maybe those advisers are the problem, but in the end he’s responsible. We shall see if there is any backlash. With all of the problems in the state it’s a head-scratcher as to why Newsom is going down this path.

  4. Spurinna

    If I had to guess from long experience- he’s become a mean drunk and it will get worse.

  5. Joe

    My hunch on Mahan’s funding was correct. From the Merc:

    A week after San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan made a late entry into the governor’s race at the end of last month, he announced on social media that his campaign “might be making history” for how quickly it had gathered more than $7 million in political donations, vaulting him past most of his Democratic rivals in fundraising for the wide-open race.

    Politico soon reported that tech heavyweights, including Y Combinator executive Michael Seibel and Riot Games co-founder Marc Merrill, had given at least $3.3 million to a newly formed independent committee supporting Mahan’s bid.

  6. Joe

    I’m going to cross-post this comment to the High-cost rail – Part 166 post as well. I seldom do this, but it fits in this instance.

    I had a chance to hear Matt Mahan on-line discussing a wide variety of issues as interviewed by David Crane of Govern for California–a close observer of California politics. Mahan comes across well–thoughtful and articulate. When Crane asked for his thoughts on high-speed rail, Mahan retorted “Oh, gosh” and went silent for a bit.

    He then went on to recite how “everything has gone wrong”. Right of way, Eminent Domain, CEQA impact, etc., but no mention of the cost overruns. So far, so good. He then went on to say, “we should finish the first segment” and then look at the “Valley to Valley” segment to enhance commutes to Silicon Valley jobs.

    For a guy with a variety of business experience and major of the largest city in NorCal, he seemed comfortable with pouring more good money after bad. There was no sense of cutting bait on sunk costs. He said he had lived in Boston and New York and that the Northeast did transit well so we could do the same. No mention of how to fix the mess we have here now. One can only hope that if elected he would make the logical, responsible move.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading