Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

This is an interesting month in the climate wars with Bill Gates issuing a statement that basically said “nevermind” after years of haranguing us, eight miles of rainforest cut down for a climate conference in Brazil and some of our local governments trying to keep their all-electric “reach codes” on life support. Per the DJ:

After some legal hiccups, cities throughout the region, including San Mateo, are revisiting policies that incentivize use of electric appliances and penalize reliance on gas infrastructure in homes and buildings.

That “legal hiccup” was the Ninth Circuit eviscerating Berkeley’s overreach on natural gas. Our neighboring city to the south is reacting with a revision that

Would require single-family homes, duplexes, townhomes and commercial buildings to install either a heat pump or higher-efficiency air conditioner at the time the original AC unit needs replacement.  The potential reach code would also require the addition of electric infrastructure when certain types of renovations are already underway.

Then San Mateo broached a “scoring” system to award points to homeowners for choosing various electric-only options. You would not be wrong to compare that to the CCP’s Social Credit system. At least one councilor has a glimmer of understanding about complexity (i.e. staff time) and costs although it apparently didn’t deter her from plunging ahead.

This is already going to be really complicated to understand, but it’s also an opportunity to really bring our community along because with a number of the other reach codes, there have been real cost issues associated with them, where people thinking the cost was going to be X, and the cost ends up being X plus 50%,” Councilmember Lisa Diaz Nash said.

Here are a few of the costs that get us to X + 50% —or way more–2X, 3X?. Things have gotten even more expensive than when I wrote that five years ago. Some day I would love to see the DJ or the Daily Post survey council members up and down the Peninsula (and County supes) to see if any of them are all-electric. Aside from new construction, I’ll be it’s very very few.

Posted in , , , , ,

8 responses to “Natural Gas Gets a Reprieve?”

  1. Paloma Ave

    Just another nanny state move, by politicians who want to run again, claiming to be concerned about the climate. This will cost big bucks for homeowners, make trades works happy, but will not have an significant effect on our climate.

    Whatever happen to freedom choice? Apparently thought on applies to women to abort?

  2. Peter Garrison

    Got your Nanny State right here: Those sun-beaten banners downtown intruding on my existential subjectivity. PLAY SHOP EAT LIVE…

    As cringe-worthy as a burned-wood living room plaque: LIVE LAUGH LOVE.

    Not in a playful mood; got stuff to do.
    Shopping is not one of my errands; get out of my wallet.
    Not hungry; get out of my homeostatis.
    Live: Useless advice. Already alive; if I weren’t the advice is even more ridiculous.

  3. Joe

    Further south in Menlo Park we get another example of the Green Grift gone awry. The Daily Post has a front-page article about the $4.5 million state grant is got to cover residents’ cost to replace natural gas appliances with electric ones. Yep, a 33,800 person got $4.5M for this and then the council restricted applicants to the Belle Haven neighborhood. I assume that is the poor part of MP and people had to be making less than 80% of the median income.

    So how did it go? 17 homes participated. Menlo Park got half of the $4.5M in Sept. 2023 and was supposed to spend it by March 31. I guess they mean March of 2026. They have to spend the second half by Dec 2027! Yikes. That’s a lotta coin for nothing.

  4. Joe

    This letter writer to the Comicle hits the nail on the head. I will repost it in a couple of places since the topic is hot –no pun intended.

    Regarding “Replacing a broken water heater in the Bay Area is about to get vastly more expensive” (Bay Area, SFChronicle.com, May 6): No one seems to acknowledge the time involved in such a replacement.

    My 1915 house will require major modification to support an electric heat pump, so the timeline looks like this: find an electrician, apply for an electrical permit, find a plumber, apply for a plumbing permit, get on the schedule of the electrician and the plumber, wait for them to do the work and wait for final inspection from the Building Department.

    Even an optimist can see that this process will take a significant amount of time — and my home will not have hot water for some of it.

    Electric water heaters should be mandated in new construction or remodeling, but can we please have some common sense when it comes to requiring them for older homes?

    Laurel Winzler, San Francisco

  5. Joe

    And gas gets another reprieve:

    In a 3-0 decision, the 5th U.S. ‌Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans ruled in favor of seven states that challenged the Department of Energy’s “direct final rule” for consumer-grade stoves and ovens…

    The August 2024 rule was intended to limit how much energy consumers use in kitchen appliances, and to ban an older technology known ⁠as linear power supplies.

    Circuit Judge Andrew Oldham said the Energy Department should not have fast-tracked the rule, knowing that numerous states opposed a 2023 attempt to enact similar efficiency standards. He… dismissed the rule as part of a push by former the former administration to make home appliances “more expensive and less useful…”

    “The ‌previous administration’s gas-stove measures were among its most controversial energy ⁠proposals,” Oldham wrote. “The idea that all that controversy could be elided using the Direct Final Rule—a mechanism designed for consensus rulemaking—is untenable.

  6. Spurinna

    Common sense.

  7. Joe

    Here’s a little factoid from the US Oil and Gas Association to put in one’s pipe and smoke:

    Natural gas prices 1985: $2.51

    Today: about $2.80

    After inflation, that $2.51 from 1985 is $7.80 in today’s money.

    So natural gas is actually much cheaper – about one-third of what it really cost 40 years ago.
    ——————————
    I’ll bet we can’t say that about California electricity prices that are the second highest in the nation (after Hawaii).

  8. Phinancier

    Facts and figures and cost trends do not matter to the climate alarmists. They believe what they believe and no one can change their little minds. Sorry.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading