Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Let's do one more education-related post to keep the streak running.  The Sunday SF Comicle section titled "Insight" provided a rare sliver of insight this week.  I enjoy watching new words being created and this piece brought wider notice to the term "Pretendianism" to describe the act of faking your ethnic background to take advantage of ethnicity-driven hiring programs.  The piece titled "Pretendianism too common in academia" asks the question: How do so many people with no Native ties get away with using a false heritage to infiltrate some of the most rarefied academic spaces in America?

I'll skip over the details of one Associate professor Elizabeth Hoover's gaming of the system because the article leaked an even more egregious practice at UC Berkeley that probably exists elsewhere in publicly funded academia.  It's hardly news and it's quite profitable as the Other Elizabeth has been proving for more than a decade.

But deep in the article, this tidbit is revealed

Contrary to some reports, Hoover was not a “cluster hire,” the faculty member said, which is when several new faculty members identified as members of a minority or historically disadvantaged groups are brought aboard simultaneously — a method has been championed at UC Berkeley to make “an immediate and substantial impact far greater than a few isolated hires.” 

Yikes!  Is this a "cheaper by the dozen" approach?  Let's not spend time and effort examining individuals' skill sets.  We'll just hire a handful all at once that look the right way.  One wonders if that tactic would survive the "shoe on the other foot" test?  Is it any wonder that campuses are a mess?  California taxpayers are not getting their money's worth, and the faculty lounge is the first place where the shades should be lifted and sunlight should shine.  "Rarefied spaces" indeed.

Posted in , ,

3 responses to “UC Berkeley: “Cluster hires”. What could go wrong?”

  1. Phinancier

    If there are cluster hires are there cluster fires or just cluster f*&%s?

  2. Joe

    This guy’s letter to the Comicle editors today is quite fun since he references the Greek philosophers. I’m still waiting for someone to draw a straight line back to Fauxcahontas who I believe still has a teaching position at Harvard in addition to her US Senate seat!:
    ____________________________
    Suppose UC Berkeley is justified in unnaming Kroeber Hall because of Alfred Kroeber’s alleged disrespect for Indigenous California peoples. What is the appropriate action for Hoover, a woman of European ancestry profiting from being someone she is not?
    Greek thinkers embraced the view that each person seeks to maximize their own advantage within understood societal constraints. Hoover embraced maximizing her advantage without a concern for societal constraints, without which, there is no morality.
    It is time to “unname” Hoover from the tenured track faculty and for the university administration to publicly acknowledge its error.
    James Barter, Berkeley
    ————————
    And as a bonus we get yet another new word–the TypePad text editor is highlighting that “unname” ain’t a word.

  3. Joe

    New DOJ, new focus:
    The U.S. Department of Justice is investigating diversity hiring practices at the University of California, the latest of many federal probes into the university system and others in California since President Donald Trump took office.
    On Thursday, the department’s Civil Rights Division chief Harmeet Dhillon notified UC President Michael Drake it is investigating possible violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which protects employees and job applicants from discrimination based on race, religion, sex and national origin. The new probe takes aim at the UC 2030 Capacity Plan, which aims to swell the numbers of UC graduates and promote racial diversity in student bodies.
    Dhillon contended in the letter to Drake that “we have reason to believe” the UC 2030 Plan may include sex- and race-based hiring quotas for employees and potentially “runs afoul of federal law.” But she also noted that “we have not reached any conclusions about the subject matter of the investigation” and that “we intend to consider all relevant information” in the probe.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading