Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

The on-going saga of the "renewal" of El Camino Real took another turn as the Citizens Environmental Council bought off on the plan to take out 85 Eucs along the main thoroughfare through town–the signature feature of B'game. Councilmembers Beach and Brownrigg are the designated electeds on this Council. The key part of the Daily Journal story about the decision is

There was limited feedback from community members during the meeting

Whereas Zoom-dom has made some things more accessible, it seems to me it has stymied the kind of public input that happens when a bunch of people show up live in City Council chambers and look officials in the eye.  We've covered this on-going ECR issue in the past; last January here and in 2018 here.  The fragility of the traffic lights and how we handle that now is here.  The Caltrans public comment period closes tonight, but that is far from the end of the story.  My guess is most of the people in town have no idea that some CEC would agree to take out the historically-designated tree grove.  The story isn't over til the chainsaws roar.

As if that isn't enough, the bike advocates want to take away at least one lane!  The resident twenty-something who has lived here for about a minute and half but doesn't like anything as it is, weighed in

After the discussion, Burlingame resident Madeline Frechette expressed her displeasure with the nature of the discussion, which excluded what will happen between the curbs.  “The exclusion of themes like rapid transit or safe bike infrastructure is confusing,” she said in an email. “Certainly what happens to the tree line and sidewalks could have ramifications for the roadway, and we are at a point in history where we cannot afford to selectively prioritize concerns about greenery aesthetics.”

That last bit is classic doubletalk.  She's the one doing the "selective prioritizing".  More importantly, she is apparently blissfully unaware that there are dedicated north and south bike lanes that parallel ECR a couple of blocks away on California and Carolan that are much closer to two forms of public transit.  Nor has she any consideration of the impact on police, fire and ambulance access of shutting down anything "between the curbs" on our busy artery.  These Eucs offer more than "greenery aesthetics" if one remembers our history like this incident in 2009.

Eucs and truck

Posted in , ,

55 responses to “Bye Bye Eucalyptus?”

  1. Handle Bard

    L, let me be more clear. I make right turns coming from Capuchino not the west side that has the light. Sometimes I even hit it hard and make a left turn.

  2. Bryan

    Burlingame resident here: I like having trees, but please remove these darn eucalyptus! They are non-native, problematic, fire hazards, and borderline invasive. We can replace them with other, better trees, perhaps even something from California. Plus maybe even put in a few left-turn lanes while we’re at it.

  3. Just Sayin’

    I’m getting real tired of the fire hazard BS. I’ve been in Burlingame for more than 40 years and I’m not aware of a single one of these trees catching fire. Nada. None.

  4. The “Fire Hazard Designation” is/was a By-Product of “The Oakland Hills Fire” decades ago to minimize the Multimillion Dollar Claims against Alameda County and the Insurance Companies. They both presented the “Act of God” excuse.
    The Eucalyptus Trees are no more flammable than any other Pacific Coast Tree. With the exception of Redwoods. They don’t Burn.
    Regarding “Non-Native” Species, Blue Gum Eucalyptus…
    It has been determined (look it up) that Eucalyptus Trees are no longer an Invasive Species in California.

  5. HMB

    A lot of eucs are fire tolerant and even need it to open their seedpods — it’s the shedding bark and dead leaves that are the problem. When those catch fire and embers spread in the wind …

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading