Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Interesting piece in the San Mateo Daily Journal today –

"Tension on the Burlingame City Council may be coming to a head. One councilmember is suggesting that all five meet in a closed session to discuss how to speak to each other in public. The need arises from some recent phrasing by others that was not received well.

In some recent decisions, the 3-2 votes have put councilwomen Terry Nagel and Cathy Baylock on the short end of the vote. Nagel and Baylock have lost on funding crossing guards and extending a sound wall further than what the others wanted on Rollins Road. Doing so would have blocked a car dealership which brings in significant money for the city. However, two key planning decisions housing on the Bayfront and the Safeway project placed Vice Mayor Joe Galligan and Councilman Mike Coffey on the short end. Mayor Rosalie O'Mahony has been the swingwoman for most decisions and ultimately, the winner. One Burlingame political insider said O'Mahony played it smart in endorsing Nagel in the last election, ensuring that she will have three votes when it comes to planning issues and three votes the other way when it comes to financial and business decisions.

For the record, O'Mahony said she is running for a fifth term in 2005, despite some whispers she wouldn't. And she will win."

Add Miss Rosalie to the list of 2005 election candidates … it must now be about 12 candidates whispering in the wind to run in 2005. We know the new Council will work together and won't snipe at each other like our present one. Look forward to the election – it will be fun, interesting and challenging!

– Written by admin

Posted in

5 responses to “Rosalie Running?”

  1. Pauline

    I hope the council can sit around a circle and hum kumbaya!

    I love the expression “recent phrasing” – wow that is one way of putting it! One suggestion may be that council members have the courtesy to listen to their buddies (and public speakers) and don’t turn their backs and shuffle papers. Just a suggestion!

  2. Perhaps it’s time to replace Baylock, O’Mahony, and Galligan. LOL

  3. Do we need term limits in Burlingame? Five terms is far too long.

  4. rich grogan

    What a splendid idea, term limits for Council Members. Do we bring this issue before the Council and ask them to act on the request or do we go directly to the petition and onto the ballot.

    The open ended time to serve on the City Council is just another “paradigm” and as you know to be successful, paradigms need to be changed, frequently

    I can hear the arguments now; I am sure they will be similar to those of the “buggy whip” makers. If we listened to them then and if we listen to them now we will not move forward.

    I would like to suggest that a council member “terms out” after serving three (3) terms. I would like to, also, suggest the lifetime medical benefit, only apply after serving three full terms.

  5. I have not heard of any other community giving their retired city council members medical insurance.

    With the expence of medical insurance I feel this entire plan should be revisited.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading