Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

I got my Sample Ballot in the mail today so "game on".  Let's face it:  the City Council race is a snooze.  Steve Duncan hasn't built the network of supporters needed to knock off an incumbent.  I should know since my wife knocked off three of them in succession, but it took several tries to get it right.  On the other hand, the B'game School District  (BSD for short) is shaping up to be a real race.  There has not been an actual election in 12 years for BSD Trustee but this year we have four candidates for three seats.  Even if you don't have kids or they are out of the elementary system, you should still care.  I won't bother to go into why here.

I don't endorse new candidates that I don't already know without sitting down for a talk.  Elizabeth Kendall came highly recommended and agreed to a sit down chat last week after several mutual friends assured her I don't bite–at least on first meeting.  We had a far ranging conversation with some mutual ground around our engineering backgrounds (hers is more in depth than mine) and how things work on the ground at Washington School where she has three kids enrolled.  That fact alone is a differentiator.

You can read her short statement in the Sample Ballot or you can go here.  I think she understates her level of commitment and ideas for improvement in the statement–sort of a rookie error.  She left out the use of Measure M funds that should mostly benefit the south end of town at this point.  The south end has seen under-investment even with the McKinley addition and with the City Council's move to add way too much "affordable housing" on public parking lots downtown, things could get urgent sooner than later.

I particularly liked her commitment (made public here since it is not in her statement) to meet with each school's PTA and site council every year.  That's just 12 meetings a year, but have the incumbents been doing it?  I don't know, but I like the initiative.  Kendall is also technically capable.  Getting the Member Hub going at Washington was good.  Spreading it to the rest of the schools is not complicated but someone has to push it.

Lastly, speaking of incumbents.  I had a short chat with Davina Drabkin yesterday in my front yard.  (School board candidates walking precincts–how great is that?)  She told me she encouraged Elizabeth Kendall to run.  And she is running on a slate with Kay Coskey, so where does that leave Doug Luftman?   He may be the odd-man out in more ways than one.  Note to Luftman who I don't know and have not met–you cannot run for "reelection" when you were not elected in the first place.  As an appointed incumbent, you have to run for election not reelection.  All of the candidates are rookies at running and he isn't the first one to make that mistake and probably won't be the last.

Bottom Line:  I think Elizabeth Kendall deserves a shot at B'game School Board trustee.

Kendall sign
  

Posted in , , ,

64 responses to “Kendall for School Board”

  1. Peter Garrison

    Agree!
    Dr. Elizabeth Kendall will be a great addition to the BSD!

  2. Lili S

    Elizabeth is a caring and active member of the Burlingame community. Her passion and focus have the potential to leave a lasting impact on our children and district!

  3. Laura

    Thanks Joe. I was wondering about Elizabeth and hadn’t had time to research her. I like that she represents my side of town as those elected officials are few and far between recently. The school boards are important. Just look at the damage that the SMUHSD school board has done over recent years. Their incompetence has destroyed the relationship with the Cities that their schools represent by taking away all fields and facilities. It just takes one bad school board. Though I personally know Kay Coskey and she has my vote, I appreciate hearing of your conversation with Eliazbeth.

  4. It would be great if our community had a candidates forum, just as San Carlos is having for their school board race:
    https://www.scefkids.org/event/san-carlos-school-board-candidate-forum/

  5. Just as a quick follow up to my earlier post above, I inquired with the League of Women Voters of North & Central San Mateo County, and here was the reply:
    “We provide volunteers as moderators, time keepers and ushers when a sponsor contacts us that they are organizing a candidates’ forum for a particular election. We don’t initiate the events. Usually the sponsor is a Chamber of Commerce, a PTA or a School Board who is interested in promoting an election.
    If you would like us to assist in a candidates’ forum in the future, please contact us. We will be happy to assist you.”

  6. Ted

    I am interested in finding out more about how each individual candidate feels about bringing back the GATE program. I would support any candidate that promises to do so.

  7. KRN

    An innovative Candidate would figure out how to “inform” the district how to help stimulate students to advance students beyond the “standard ” offerings of courses.
    In an earlier era, BHS offered Advanced Math and Advanced Social Science to enable students to progress through more challenging curriculum. These efforts were coordinated with BHS so that enough students could qualify and take Calculus BC at BHS. BIS subsequently trashed the advanced math and social science programs.
    As a parent, I worked on getting these programs implemented to help students advance (at their pace) and allow students to gain seats at more competitive colleges.
    It was nice while it lasted. Students who feed into Aragon High School have access to Multivariable Calculus and Advanced Physics because they have access to accelerated programs as K-8 students.
    Food for thought
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/calculus-for-eighth-graders-its-the-differential-in-one-school-system/2017/09/15/9877d960-9a2d-11e7-b569-3360011663b4_story?utm_term=.772e6ded39b1

  8. Mom

    Who killed GATE to begin with and how do we get it back?

  9. Mike Jarrett

    Joe,
    I think that you’ve got it right regarding Elizabeth. She seems like a great candidate and someone who can bring a lot of new and interesting ideas to the board.
    Regarding Doug Luftman, Devina Drabkin and Kay Coskey (all of whom I know and respect), I think that Doug has done an outstanding job and brings a great perspective. I would encourage you to get to know him. Both he and Elizabeth have kids currently in BSD schools and are very active in the parent communities, which is a big reason to vote for them.
    Kay and Devina are both great, but their kids are done with BSD schools and they seem to have exactly the same views on things (they are on the same yard signs and have the same website). Either of the two would be great to continue on, but we don’t need them both.
    One other small point, I don’t see anywhere that Doug says that he is running for re-election. He is the incumbent, but he was appointed to fill a vacancy. In fact, there are no members of our school board today who won an election. All of them were either appointed to fill a vacancy or ran unopposed for the slot. Kudos to Elizabeth for throwing her hat in the ring and making it interesting!!

  10. Andrew Wiles

    DRABKIN COSKY & KENDALL HIGH TAXES STRATEGY
    With all respect Sir; if you have not even taken the initiative to meet the other candidate Mr. Luftman, how are you able to make an accurate assessment. I mean; you mentioned you have a technical background somewhat scientific in nature.
    Uninformed Opinions and Theories are Dangerous
    Our firm would never hire you knowing you make decisions based on only 2/3’s of the data. Your credibility is very tarnished at this point.I’d say you are not even remotely qualified at representing the citizens of Burlingame.
    Here is all I know about the three woman candidates. They are tax-and-spend people rather than candidates committed to bettering our children’s education levels. They have already strategized on pushing forward heavy tax bonds on the citizens of Burlingame. This is 100% accurate data.
    If people like heavy additional taxes vote for the Drabkin Cosky and Kendall ticket and if you prefer a candidate who is against heavy tax bonds on the citizens of Burlingame maybe you should take a look at Lufkin.
    Burlingame’s citizens are much smarter than you give them credit for Joe.

  11. KRN

    Above should read…
    “In an earlier era, BIS offered Advanced Math and Advanced Social Science to enable students to progress through more challenging curriculum.”

  12. Elizabeth Kendall

    The Swun math curriculum currently in place was great for getting us into the swing of Common Core, but I agree that it’s time to take another look. Swun uses a “one size fits all” sort of approach which misses the mark for many of the children. There is a strong desire from the parent community to again have a differentiated math program. On a personal note, I was able take math classes at the local college campus while in high school and I appreciated how that gave me a jump start on my college career. When on the board, I will want our district to thoughtfully search for curricula that fit the needs of all our children.

  13. KRN

    Disclaimer to all Board Candidates
    You are all running to represent the people in our community for the betterment of the children of our community.
    As a teacher, I did the same thing to protect and advance the children of our community and the SMUHSD Board punished me.
    Lesson to the Board… protect your teachers who attempt to advance your objectives.
    You have strong ideas and you may need “minority” teachers who support your position.
    Be sure that you protect them.

  14. Joe

    @Mike Jarrett
    The last sentence of Doug Luftman’s candidate’s statement in the Sample Ballot reads “I am running for reelection to continue all of the great things that our District has accomplished, …..”

  15. Joe

    @Andrew Wiles
    Welcome to the Voice, dear newbie. You will fit right in; making an uninformed claim about someone else’s “uninformed opinion”.
    If I were endorsing three candidates for three seats (a full slate), you might (might!) have a point, but that is not what I did. I have sources of input in B’game that you cannot even imagine and they enable me to make solid endorsements. You are free to ignore them just like I will ignore yours.
    If you are really worried about the need for more bond money, perhaps you should worry more about the Council’s residential growth plans for this town. The School Board is the tail, the Council and Planning Commission are the dog. But what do I know, I’ve only been at this for 25 years.
    Your comment would carry more weight if you could actually get your preferred candidate’s name right both times you typed it! What is “Lufkin” running for? LOL.

  16. Yajun Wu

    @ DRABKIN COSKY & KENDALL HIGH TAXES STRATEGY
    Funny Joey (A Real Yoda)
    Now I see why you used the Dog analogy with Andrew Wiles since it fits your statement: “I have sources of input in B’game that you cannot even imagine and they enable me to make solid endorsements”
    Andrew Wiles is 100% correct: These three women candidates intend on pushing though heavy school bonds (taxes) on us Burlingamer’s.
    One of the wealthiest zip codes in America and these tax-and-spend DRABKIN COSKY & KENDALL players still want more money.
    It is Scandalous at Best
    Our family will be voting for Luftman for School Board.

  17. hillsider

    Applause. Golf clap. We have a new Alex Kent. Two in fact. Welcome Andrew Wiles and Yajun Wu. Can’t wait for y’all to show your expertise. Does “pushing though heavy school bonds (taxes)” mean getting a MAJORITY TO VOTE FOR THEM? Messy democracy we got us here.

  18. HMB

    The GATE consortium summer school was such a gift for my kids. It was a wonderful experience for kids who sometimes felt weird or ostracized for being the class nerd or brainiac — they loved spending the summer with kids who enjoyed intellectual challenge and give and take. Some of the friendships endured through the years and continued in high school. I was so sad to see it end.

  19. Just as a quick follow up to my post above: I subsequently contacted both BCE and the Burlingame PTA Council (umbrella group for the individual school PTA groups) to see if they might be able to host a League of Women Voters school board debate (like the one in San Carlos). The proverbial ball is in their court.

  20. It is great to see the conversation about the BESD race since we have not had a contested election in 12 years. And thank you Lorne for looking into having a candidate’s forum. Elections are healthy for our town and it is nice to have four very qualified candidates running for election…

  21. Name recognition

    Oh Hillsider, if you’re going to use my name, at least have the balls to use yours, Mr. Trustfund Kid. What ARE you referring to anyway? Yes, I’ve worked with more public and private schools on real estate transactions than any other broker I’ve ever heard of in the Bay Area. No, I’m not necessarily for huge bonds. Yes, I’m for compensating teachers as well as possible to attract the best and brightest.

  22. Bruce Dickinson

    Listen, folks, Bruce Dickinson isn’t as familiar with the School Board candidates, but I’ll be sure to have my staff and contacts get me up to speed very quickly. My granddaughter goes to elementary school in Burlingame and of course, my donations to the community school fundraiser organization help “make a difference” and I would like to know about the stewardship of those funds, namely the ones who will be making decisions on how it gets allocated and why.
    Now, with respect to the the poster in this thread, who masquerades as 3 posters (Yajun Wu, Andrew Wiles, Name Recognition), someone who, let’s be clear, doesn’t live in burlingame, let me just clue you in: Your credibility is on the low side, in your multi-phasic personality username approach, your inability to make cogent arguments with solid support, your comments that are always lashing as if coming from a cornered wounded animal, you attack the owners of this website (who allow you to do so in the spirit of speech freedom) and finally your shenanigans by posting phone numbers and personal information of others on this site many times previously. We know you have been censored and censured multiple times by Joe and Russ for your behavior on these threads. So let’s just say in the context of all of that, you need to raise the bar higher, by a LOT, to put it mildly.
    Let’s just say that even suggesting your knowledge and connections are on par with Joe is basically saying you can win an &ss-kicking contest against him, but you only have one leg.
    Bruce Dickinson would like to see this thread try to objectively address the pros and cons of each candidate and how they relates to the strength and weaknesses of the Burlingame school district. Anything outside of that is merely noise and unnecessary distraction and confusion.
    Let’s get right into the meat of this!

  23. Chaos Theory

    I will not support any candidate who plans on raising our taxes through a school bond. This is why I support Mr. Luftman for School Board.
    https://goo.gl/images/yjwq4C
    The November vote is not on the improvement of our children’s education but solely on the approval of authorizing the expenditure of possibly the biggest school bond in Burlingame, California history.
    I have an uneasy feeling that there is something amiss in the philosophy of the school district when it comes to balancing a simple budget. As wealthy as our City is per capita; how can you not balance our budget? Could it be we are turning teachers and Administrators into Millionaires?
    We can do better than Drabkin Cosky & Kendall. Please join me in voting “no” to high taxes and “yes” to a balanced budget.
    I think that Mr Luftman has done an outstanding job and brings a great perspective to our school board..
    Vote: for Luftman

  24. Name recognition

    Bruce, once again, you are completely wrong in your assumptions about me, and about this website and about the Burlingame community.
    “Now, with respect to the the poster in this thread, who masquerades as 3 posters (Yajun Wu, Andrew Wiles, Name Recognition)…”
    Nope, “Name Recognition” is not the other two names that you wrote. I have always used the name space as a title of what I’ve written, and you are grossly exaggerating and mischaracterizing my writing on this website and within the community.
    I was simply addressing a random and seemingly negative post by Hillsider.
    Actually, my contribution on this website and my volunteer contributions to the Burlingame and surronding communities has been far above and beyond what the vast majority has contributed. But then again, you wouldn’t know.

  25. Name recognition

    Just to be crystal clear in this thread, I Alex Kent, did not write the posts above under the names “Yajun Wu”, nor “Andrew Wiles”, and only under the handle “Name Recognition” in direct retort to Hillsider’s random and incorrect assumption and statement. I have and will always post using the name section as the title of my post, as I find this more useful than keeping the same handle over time.
    I do not know any of this year’s school board candidates, nor do I have any opinion about any of them. If anyone has any questions or concerns about any of my previous posts here from over the past several years (my family lived in Burlingame for 8 years), feel free to contact me via LinkedIn.
    Please be careful what you say or write about other people on this website and beyond, simply using a handle does not absolve you from discovery and from each of our civil rights and from laws which protect each of us from libel and slander.
    Kindly,
    Alex Kent

  26. Bruce Dickinson

    Wow, Bruce Dickinson is having my secretary Julie doing a lot of searches and repeating the same stuff over and over again… here’s one from the following thread, for those trying to brandish “legal action”. In this case, Julie is thankful, as it ends up saving quite a few transcribing key strokes.
    http://www.burlingamevoice.com/2015/04/there-are-like-150-restaurants/comments/page/1/#comments
    April 17, 2015: (Bruce Dickinson) “Hillsider, guy, rest assured, do not be bullied online by whomever is is exactly that bullying you (I lost track at this point). In addition to what locavore adeptly said, Bruce Dickinson would be happy to sick some of the most aggressive lawyers known to man, namely those in the intellectual property, music, and recorded industry law practices. When it comes to civil and property rights, these guys can do cartwheels in the courtroom, and I mean courts like the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, the Delaware Chancery Court, and of course, the Supreme Court. You just give me a call if you’re hassled, and rest assured, empty threats will be dispensed of swiftly and decisively. A few of these guys owe Dr. Dickinson a favor or two.”
    April 16, 2015 from username “Locavore”:
    “Before brandishing the threat of lawsuits, be aware that California goes beyond protecting Fed Constitutional rights of the 1st Amendment (free speech) in some of the most aggressive anti-SLAPP statutes that prohibit frivolous lawsuits and subpoenas.
    Reference California Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, 425.17, 425.18 and 1987.1 and 1987.2
    Judges do not take kindly to SLAPPs as they tie up extremely constrained Court resources for far more important matters.”

  27. Name recognition

    Yep, Bruce, as usual you made incorrect assumptions about who was posting, in your on-going off-topic arrogance and rants about your Ferraris.
    Don’t worry, I’ll hand-deliver your subpoena to our front door if you continue. You keep building the case against you with every post.

  28. Sandy Wich

    In our field, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is considered a bunch of Baboons and low IQ. Hope you can do better than them. You little Wankers

  29. Bruce Dickinson

    Name Recognition,
    1) what “case” would that be?
    2) subpoena exactly what considering all is on the BV?

  30. Name recognition

    Fake Bruce,
    Liabel https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1TSNP_enUS673US673&q=liable&spell=1&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiCn5i6jOLWAhUrilQKHaJWB00QBQgjKAA&biw=1536&bih=760
    Tort https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1TSNP_enUS673US673&biw=1536&bih=760&q=tort&oq=tort&gs_l=psy-ab.3..0i67k1j0i131k1l2j0l5j0i131k1j0.87925.88292.0.88699.4.4.0.0.0.0.152.295.0j2.2.0….0…1.1.64.psy-ab..2.2.295….0.ie9gx24d4Uo
    Just quit jumping to incorrect conclusions about who is or isn’t making posts, especially when your posts consistently commit liabel and torts against those current and former residents of Burlingame and the surrounding communities.
    My wife, 2 children and I and our extended family members have an excellent long-term track record of academic, business and philanthropic time, relationship and monetary contributions both in the Bay Area and globally – and none of us deserve even the slightest negative comment here or anywhere else.
    Cease and desist. https://www.google.com/search?q=Cease+and+desist.&rlz=1C1TSNP_enUS673US673&oq=Cease+and+desist.&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.631j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

  31. Dear NR,
    Please realize the Burlingame Voice is- in my opinion, supposed to be:
    -Fun
    -Funny
    – Informative. Especially if you like Rumors, Fake News, and the opportunity to be the first one to know the latest “Scuttlebutt” at the City of Burlingame City Hall.
    You NR, need to turn off ALL your IT devices,cell phone, sell your 2000 Prius and purchase a 1960/70 Muscle Car.
    If that is a financial burden, a nice Neck Tattoo should be adequate.
    Live a little NR.

  32. This “interaction” between you both is Fascinating..
    Sharing your relationship with each other, as well as the “People of the Burlingame Voice,” is a gift that keeps on giving, and giving.
    As I see this conversation unfold, it has become a “Film Noir.” An Alfred Hitchcock plot for a movie.
    Thank you for your contributions.

  33. Beenhereforever

    Have heard that the teachers of Burlingame have voted to endorse Luftman and Kendall. Go big.

  34. Glad we’re back on topic 🙂 FYI, with specific regard to Ms. Kendall and Mr. Luftman, both of them were among four applicants who sought to be appointed to former trustee (now San Mateo Union High School District trustee) Greg Land’s seat, when he had to step down in 2015. One of the other four applicants was Michael Jarrett, who posted in this string above and also deserves gratitude for his willingness to serve -as do each of the applicants, as well as the four candidates in this election. For more background/info on Ms. Kendall and Mr. Luftman, see BSD board agenda/minutes (items 7.1, 7.2 & 7.3) below, including PDFs of the respective letters of intent they wrote to BSD when seeking appointment, followed by each of the trustees’ subsequent votes & rationale at the time:
    https://burlingame.agendaonline.net/public/Meeting.aspx?AgencyID=44&MeetingID=2905&AgencyTypeID=1&IsArchived=True

  35. And on another note:
    The Burlingame PTA Council is co-sponsoring a public forum for all Burlingame School Board candidates. A moderator from the League of Women Voters will time prepared speeches and facilitate a Q&A.
    There are three seats open and four candidates. Take this opportunity to educate yourself and cast an informed vote on November 7th.
    What: Burlingame school board candidate forum
    When: 7pm, Wednesday, October 25, 2017
    Where: Burlingame Intermediate School Auditorium, 1715 Quesada Way, Burlingame

  36. Elizabeth Kendall

    The Burlingame PTA Council is co-sponsoring a public forum for all Burlingame School Board candidates. A moderator from the League of Women Voters will time prepared speeches and facilitate a Q&A.
    The forum will be held Wednesday, October 25, at 7p in the Burlingame Intermediate School auditorium (1715 Quesada Way).

  37. Fix is In

    Original Idea. The League of Women Voters moderating is like asking Stalin to moderate a Q&A on the Pro’s & Con’s of Communism.
    Why not let the public ask the questions?

  38. Cesar Orosco

    The Burlingame PTA council is sponsoring a public forum for candidates to share their vision and goals on Wednesday, Oct 25 @ 7 pm, at the Burlingame Intermediate School Auditorium (1715 Quesada Way) This is a great opportunity to hear directly from the candidates and ask questions.
    This is an important election, and it’s great to have options.

  39. hillsider

    I hear maybe there is a candidate forum somewhere soon :-0

  40. BHS Student

    With regards to the GATE program, a topic that was discussed earlier in the thread, I am very reluctant as to its overall benefits. As a student at Burlingame High School, and a member of the GATE program, I find it to be snobbish and ineffective.
    The mission of the program, as spelled out on the BHS website, is to provide services “for students who possess a capacity for excellence far beyond that of their peers”. There is absolutely no truth in suggesting that only GATE students can ‘handle the intellectual rigor’ of the activities that the program offers; as much as you parents may want to think, we are not geniuses.
    Recently, I received an email from the GATE coordinator with an attached survey. In it, one of the questions was regarding the “biggest issues that GATE students face” in the classroom, a prompt that effectively suggested GATE students to be the ‘victims’ of our educational system.
    Not only do I find it appalling that we are being treated as precious specimens with precious concerns, the GATE program further subjugates our school community. Only GATE students get early registration priority to SAT and ACT preparation courses, and only GATE students are able to attend specialized field trips and events. Particularly with the test prep courses, the program is only widening the divide between the highest scoring and lowest scoring students on the standardized tests. The people who actually deserve the priority for test prep registration are those who are having the most trouble with the material.
    A truly useful GATE program would encourage students to help those who are struggling, and would allow for the wide gap that exists today to be narrowed. There are already opportunities in place for students who want to challenge themselves, such as AP and AS classes as well as the newly reinstated Pilot Math Program.
    Ultimately, though, the GATE program is a barrier to a better education. Students who perform well on tests that measure skills unrelated to grit, personality and creativity are being whisked away while everyone else is being left behind. If your child is smarter than everyone else in their class, then they have a unique opportunity to help others reach their level. And they’re defenitely not the smartest at everything.

  41. Train

    Isn’t Luftman the only candidate with a child currently enrolled in the district?

  42. HI-IQ

    BHS Student,
    It seems you missed the point You are suggesting a social justice program, not a Gifted Program. You make for a nice rant, but you may not understand that AP and AS are not Gifted Education.
    The elementary programs were innovative, progressive and challenging to gifted young minds. They often allowed students to accelerate beyond their grade peers and engage in topics that would entertain rather than bore them.
    If the program at your high school isn’t meeting your needs (or stimulating you) then you should as for more.
    There are many gifted students who are bored to death with rote memorization or listening to mediocre teachers impress themselves with what they think are intelligent lessons.
    Glance down the street to Silicon Valley and ask “where did those innovators come from?”
    Many of them left school because they were gifted and there was no stimulation in school.
    Just remember the next time you take out your IPhone, desire a Tesla, or post on Facebook that a gifted child is advancing your world. Imaging if they had an additional opportunity in school.
    ” I find it to be snobbish and ineffective.” You have a right to your opinion.
    “we are not geniuses” You may not be a member of the group, but you don’t get to speak for the others.

  43. @Train, Elizabeth Kendall has three children still in the elementary school program…

  44. The Burlingame PTA will be live streaming the school candidates forum on October 25, and posting the recording here:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=34_FczlB-UY

  45. BHS Student

    HI-IQ, before we continue with our discussion, I was just curious: have you ever been in a GATE program? Or are you the parent of a GATE student?
    Anyhow, if GATE activities are “innovative, progressive and challenging to young minds,” why shouldn’t all students be able to participate? I believe that everyone can contribute a ‘gifted’ idea to any GATE program.
    Broadly, however, I just don’t see the connection between boredom and intelligence. I find it hard to believe that any student would find a class in which a central part is “rote-memorization” to be interesting or exciting, whether the student is ‘gifted’ or not. In your example, does the blame not fall on the teacher, rather than students, who you suggest are ‘bringing the class to that level’?
    An article by Slate Magazine cites scientific research that claims that “being bored actually signals to the mind that you’re in need of fresh ideas and [it] spurs creative thinking.” To that end, maybe GATE programs hinder a ‘gifted’ child’s ability to reach their full potential; after all, they might prevent a situation that is actually beneficial to them.
    In the same way, ‘gifted’ students should aim to take their own initiative. Rather than expecting to have their consternation quelled by parents or school administrators, the ‘gifted’ should be able to independently find ways to stimulate themselves and become more engaged in the world around them. Constantly telling students that they’re special or need a ‘stimulating education’ to satisfy their unique needs will only make them less curious, for they will think that they know enough already.
    On a personal note, though, I do not own a smartphone. I do not dream of driving a Tesla. And I do not have any social media accounts unto which I can post selfies. The inventions that have changed our society have not had a solely positive effect. Perhaps your GATE student could fix that.
    Link to Slate Magazine article that I referenced: http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/07/01/studies_shows_why_boredom_may_boost_creativity

  46. Jennifer

    Maybe the term “gifted” is over-used. I’m a lot older than you, and I’d be willing to bet the ratio of exceptionally “smart” kids to the rest of the population has remained relatively constant through time. The difference is probably just an inappropriate or perhaps “modified” use of the term.
    In the late 1970s (when I was in high school), the kids for whom the term “gifted” was reserved accounted for perhaps 1 in 100, and that might even be generous. Everyone knew who the couple of them in the school (SMHS) were. They were beyond smart, it was another quality that cannot really be described.
    I remember being very surprised at the term being so loosely used when my kids entered BHS in the 2000s. My kids are not “gifted” in any real sense of the word, but they are “smart” like many of kids in BHS. Some of the kids may not be exceptionally smart, but they are “ambitious”.
    I think there is (or at least was) a huge difference between “smart” and “gifted”. I’m not sure this is relevant for the topic, but I’m throwing it out there, because maybe the acronym GATE could use an overhaul to express classes offering opportunities for those who can handle or want to try to handle topics at an accelerated rate. The fewest of these kids will be truly “gifted’, but the opportunity to take on more work (if that is desired) should be available in the public school system for any kid willing to take on that challenge.
    Public schools have always worked for our family, but if these classes aren’t made available these days, then we can always expect an exodus to the private schools, since there will be at least the perception that they have more to offer the “smart” and/or “ambitious” kids.

  47. HI-IQ

    BHS Student
    I was a GATE student as a child.
    You should also know that many times, “The apple does not fall far from the tree” so the mass of Silicon Valley execs who live in Burlingame also have children who are gifted. (This makes exclusion from the club more difficult)
    You referenced “Bored at Work”… this is school… or prison as many Gifted kids have named it. You can quite your job, you can’t quit school..
    As stated above, Burlingame families who have the funds have left the public schools. BHS has had a “brain drain” since the early 2000’s after the first .com boom.
    According to your logic, ALL students can become a great musician or ALL students can become a star athlete.
    Foolish.
    All students cannot become gifted.
    Call me arrogant or call me a classist, but you can also call me correct.
    And no….. not all students can benefit from these types of experiences.
    According to your logic, Athletic Boosters should give their money to everyone who does not make the team and Ban Boosters should also give away their funds to a student who cannot play a note of music.
    The idea that all students are gifted is another one of those “feel good, everyone gets a Blue Ribbon” movements.
    Citing sources like Slate to define gifted education illustrates your confusion on the issue. If you took a look at Stanford’s former EPGY, (now giftedandtalented.com) John’s Hopkins, etc you would find academic data that supports gifted education.
    GATE students are bored every day in the classroom, but they are required to produce the mind numbing work assigned by teachers.
    If GATE students were offered the opportunity to leave public school for a better environment you would see a mass exodus (following the students with money) to other interests.
    Why do so many students in SF want to get into Lowell?
    Gifted Magnet schools across the country have wait lists.
    In California, teachers now come from the BOTTOM half of their CSU class. A quick look at BHS will reveal this fact. Teachers from the BOTTOM half of their CSU class should not be teaching AP courses. When a group of mediocre teacher think they are smart…. and they are not…. the only result is trouble. (A gifted student will “slice and dice” a mediocre teacher most days of the week…. And then will be punished for being highly intelligent.”
    GATE stands for GIFTED and Talented. There should be gifted students in the program because they are artists, musicians and dancers with talent far above their peers. These students may not have a high GPA, but they are gifted.
    Gifted students NEED a different type of instruction.
    Advanced Placement is not gifted education…. It’s advanced as in one or two grade levels ahead. Gifted education is about depth, analysis, and application.
    Common Core is “anti-gifted” as it does not allow flexibility to move forward as a “student’s” pace.
    “The inventions that have changed our society have not had a solely positive effect.”
    Your argument is based on a “glass is half empty point of view.” The world is now more connected than ever and social media has helped thwart revolutions around the world. Smartphones are for more that taking pictures as they can deliver vital information around the world in seconds. The electric car and its battery innovations will relieve the world of its dependence on fossil fuels and advance green energy (and double the jobs of coal and oil) to a sustainable level.
    Gifted education is not about the Hipster and his man bun sitting in a coffee house typing on a laptop. Its about providing highly stimulating instruction to the children who need more than the failed lessons of an unprepared teacher or society.

  48. Very well described, HI-IQ, especially the parts about the gifted students ( music, arts, dance, etc…) and the phrase “Gifted education is not about the Hipster and his man bun sitting in a coffee house typing on a laptop”…you are a gifted writer! In my day, we were called “MGM’s”: Mentally Gifted Minors…and the program started in 3rd grade. This was in the 60’s when California had the best funded schools in the nation! The BHS GATE program run by Mr. Nelson was excellent! So sad to see such a wonderful program being eliminated…

  49. BHS is a good school

    Burlingame High does not experience a “brain drain” any higher than any other public school in the area. I just love the nonsense that people with a clear agenda throw out with NO PROOF WHATSOEVER. Same thing our President does. No facts, just BS allegations.
    Wealthy parents have ALWAYS sent their kids to expensive private schools. Whether in Washington, DC where there are a tremendous number of expensive private schools or on the San Francisco Peninsula where parents have choices like:
    University High
    Urban High
    Stuart Hall High School
    International High School
    Lick-Wilderming
    Crystal Springs Upland
    Menlo School
    Sacred Heart Prep
    and on and on and on…
    Each one of these schools has tuition of around $40,000 per year and the same brain drain affects top music students and top athletes. It always has and it always will.
    That’s not to mention all of the lower cost Catholic schools to which many parents have traditionally sent their sons and daughters.
    The hatred for BHS is clear for a few posters on this site.
    It’s clear there is an agenda. Perhaps the children of these posters didn’t get into Cal or Stanford or UCLA or Harvard or whatever. But, I know a large number of BHS students that get into ALL of these schools each and every year.

  50. HI-IQ

    BHS is a good school….. not a great school
    It was once a great school.
    There is no hatred for BHS at all… only a clear focus on getting the public to understand what needs to be done to get it back to its previous era
    Good to Great!
    The current principal has the ability to make BHS a great school.
    There are real issues. Ask the students… they will tell you that beside the Little Big Game, there is little or no school spirit. The hate that their teachers not only talk about the students (among themselves and in front of them!) but some are also arrogant for no reason.
    I’d say the posters here are from a BHS of the past and know the potential of the school rather than flinch from criticism.
    Error #1 Wealthy parents in Burlingame and Hillsborough did send their kids to BHS.
    The schools mentioned about were outlets from places without quality pubic schools. (SF)
    As the public schools began to falter… those with the funds and academic potential started to leave. The competition for quality private schools ramped up and new private schools opened to meet the need.
    Some of the best athletes around live in the BHS attendance area but go private. Better academics.
    As for the Stanford issue…. Most BHS kids who gain admission to Stanford are… a child of a Stanford employee or recruited athlete. (these are student comments as.. they did the analysis)
    There are a few standouts who’ve made it!
    I suspect you can’t name the last three students who were admitted to Harvard from BHS. Or the last one…
    The children of the posters on this site did get in to Cal, UCLA, and other quality UC schools.
    But I know a large number of students who get into these school each year.
    Be careful with what is considered a large number as you may not know what the “other” public schools are able to do…. and then we can talk about the private schools.
    “New” BHS parents who bought into the community at the $2.5 million range are paying $25k per year in taxes.
    Is the BHS education worth the cost…. or is it just bragging rights to belong to the “Club”
    I’d say you have this backwards. The posters here want what is BEST for these students and the community, which mean always looking to improve and rebounding from failure.
    Your not going to improve BHS by settling for mediocre. Stop giving out Blue Ribbons and rebuild the quality environment the fosters great learning and spirit.
    Here is a link to Harker Academy’s admissions over a three year period.
    Stanford University 42
    Harvard University 21
    Berkeley 165
    Duke University 32
    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 122
    University of Pennsylvania 23
    https://www.harker.org/upper-school/support-services/college-counseling/college-acceptances

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading