Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Should we be angry that our dear leaders appear to think we are stupid? I suppose so. How else to process these two things simultaneously? The Merc reports

A broad new water conservation law will soon take effect in phases, banning the watering of “ornamental turf” at corporate, industrial, government and homeowners’ association properties with drinking water across California as a way to preserve supplies.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the new state law in 2023 as California was emerging from a harsh three-year drought. Starting on Jan. 1, it will be illegal for local and regional government agencies across the state — including schools, cities, counties, courthouses, fire stations and libraries — to irrigate decorative grass with potable water whether or not California is in a drought. On Jan. 1, 2028, the ban will expand to commercial businesses like office parks, car dealerships, supermarkets, strip malls and corporate campuses, along with colleges and universities. And on Jan. 1, 2029, it will apply to homeowners’ associations.

But let this bit of news from the Comicle sink into your cognitive dissonance–rattled brain

For the past 21 years, he and many other Brisbane residents have opposed efforts to transform the roughly 680-acre former industrial site straddling the San Francisco border into a mixed-use development with thousands of homes. In July, after Brisbane repeatedly missed deadlines to approve a plan for up to 2,200 homes on the Baylands site that would cover 81% of its state-mandated housing allocation, California ruled the city out of compliance with state housing laws.

The plan evolved over the years as environmental studies and cleanup proposals developed, and demand for housing grew. By 2010, the proposal called for about 4,400 homes, mostly concentrated in the northwest corner of the Baylands site, away from the old landfill. The developer had also been working on a project adjacent to the site that includes the former Schlage Lock factory, where San Francisco leaders had already approved 1,674 housing units.

I won’t reach for my calculator, but one doesn’t need it to know that is a lot of housing–and that’s just Brisbane and the southern reaches of EssEff. So much for being green as in green grass. What exactly happens to all these square miles of grass that get parched and die because there is hardly any non-potable water around? And what about the trees that are interspersed on this “ornamental turf”. Do all the property owners need to run separate irrigation lines to them to keep them alive? They think we are all stupid. And perhaps a majority of us are.

P.S. update: I walk by this lovely patch of grass up at CSM every week. It’s right across from the big new dorm being built. Very ironic. Water consuming dorm next to soon-to-be-dead “ornamental grass”. As the kids say “touch grass” except for those living on the CSM campus…..

Posted in , , , , ,

4 responses to “Connecting the drops — or not”

  1. Joe

    Right on cue today’s SF Comicle has a front page article about the Candlestick Point development:

    Widening a road from two to four lanes. Installing dedicated lanes for bikes and buses. Building sidewalks with streetlights and underground stormwater systems to manage heavy rain and chronic flooding. These improvements are not as glamorous as a new hotel or park or affordable housing complex.

    After false start after false start, the infrastructure work that begins this month will create the foundation for a project that, at full build-out, will deliver 7,200 homes in Bayview, along with parks, a hotel, retail and 2.8 million square feet of office space.

    FivePoint Senior Vice President Suheil Totah said the initial infrastructure work will support seven blocks of development — six residential and one commercial. It will allow for about 700 housing units, of which 41% will be affordable, and a 350,000-square-foot office building.

    “We are building all the backbone that will support all of it,” Totah said.
    —————————————
    Of course, he left out the one tiny bit of infrastructure that is really needed to “support” another 7,200 homes plus the rest of it—more water supply. Connect the drops.

  2. Joe

    Oh, just another thousand homes………

    MENLO PARK — Hundreds of homes were added to a project to transform the SRI campus in Menlo Park into a new neighborhood, reducing the number of office spaces previously planned.

    Developer Lane Partners is proposing a “major land-use shift toward housing and open space” for the project at 333 Ravenswood Ave., known as Parkline, documents filed with the Menlo Park Planning Department show. A study session was held Sept. 14 to review the proposal.

    The SRI campus currently contains 1.38 million square feet of office space. Previous plans would have produced more than 1 million square feet of offices.

    “The commercial land area is reduced from approximately 37 acres to 14 acres, while the residential land area increases from approximately 16 acres to 44 acres,” the new proposal states.

    Under revised plans from Lane Partners, the new neighborhood would contain 1,082 homes, an increase from the previously approved 800, documents show.

  3. Joe

    From a law firm that represents HOAs when asked for specifics on the “decorative turf” potable water ban:

    We don’t expect to see any specific guidelines until after the statute takes effect. It is clear that the author of the legislation wants to eliminate the use of potable (drinking) water to irrigate landscapes.

    Accordingly, associations with decorative turf will not be able to irrigate it with potable water starting January 1, 2029. Associations with more than 5,000 square feet of irrigated area will be required to certify, commencing June 30, 2031, that their property complies with the Water Code’s requirements.

    I suspect many associations will be required to remove turf and replace it with drought-tolerant landscaping or artificial turf. Boards should start setting aside money for that eventuality. If they don’t, they may be forced to impose special assessments.

  4. Joe

    New photo added for your consideration. Who knows what will happen to the trees?

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026