Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Buried at the bottom of the Daily Journal article about the B'way grade separation study (above) is a little notation that

The council unanimously voted to authorized (Mayor) Keighran to send a letter to the District Lines Advisory Committee expressing the city's concerns about Burlingame being split up in the draft of the supervisorial district map.

This is an odd one.  You have to wonder why the Lines committee wants to lump us–and just us on the Peninsula–with the coastal towns.  Did Dave get under someone's skin?  (Not that that is a bad thing).  Are they tired of B'game candidates winning the seat (e.g. Mark Church before Dave Pine)?  Something smells in RWC.  There are some astute Supe watchers who are regular Voice readers, perhaps one of them will enlighten us.

Posted in ,

7 responses to “Pining for D. Pine”

  1. Joe

    The SM County Times has a useful piece on the redistricting here:
    http://www.mercurynews.com/san-mateo-county-news/ci_24092659/deadline-approaches-san-mateo-county-redistricting-maps#insidebayarea
    I haven’t had a chance to go to the mapping site to draw my preferred version, but we have until Friday. That site is here:
    http://www.smcdistrictlines.org.

  2. Joe

    The Daily Journal if focused on “slivers” of area or towns while the big issue is the gerrymandering of B’game.
    http://www.smdailyjournal.com/articles/lnews/2013-10-08/supervisors-ready-to-redraw-district-lines/1776425111278

  3. Joe

    Looks like B’game dodged a bullet on the redistricting:
    Supervisors Approve New District Boundaries
    REDWOOD CITY, Calif. – The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously today to adopt new boundaries for the County’s five supervisorial districts.
    “The map we selected takes into account the public input we received from every corner of San Mateo County,” said Don Horsley, president of the Board of Supervisors. “We heard from many interests and we are pleased that we were able to select a map that limited the number of cities that would be divided while at the same time uniting communities.”
    Following a public hearing, the Board voted to introduce an ordinance adopting the map “Community Unity B” as the official district boundaries. The vote followed an extensive months-long public outreach process that included a citizen’s advisory committee. Prior to the Board’s October 8th meeting, the advisory committee recommended the Board consider maps called “Community Unity” and “Equity,” which were both supported by members of the public.
    The Board ultimately blended the two maps, adopting the recommendations of the “Equity” coalition in the North County and the “Community Unity” coalition in the South County. The approved map also attempts to minimize city divisions while keeping communities of interest like the coast together in a single district.
    The adopted map divides four cities between districts: Belmont (Districts 2 and 3), Menlo Park (Districts 3 and 4), San Bruno (Districts 1 and 5) and South San Francisco (Districts 1 and 5). Belmont, South San Francisco and Redwood City were divided between districts in the existing map. The new map unifies Redwood City, which under the previous map had the Redwood Shores area in a separate district.
    Key provisions of the adopted map:
    District 1: 147,020 residents
    Millbrae, Burlingame, Hillsborough and the unincorporated San Mateo Highlands along with 71.9 percent of South San Francisco (mostly east of Junipero Sera Boulevard) and 74.6 percent of San Bruno (south of Sneath Lane and west of Interstate 280).
    I recall seeing a meeting notice for Thursday night at the San Mateo library with Warren Slocum and Claire Mack talking about the impact of this decision.

  4. jennifer

    So, I’ve read both articles, and I still don’t understand what this means for Burlingame. Can somebody spell in out in a sentence or two?

  5. Joe

    The DJ is taking a first look at the first district-level Supe races per the recent redistricting. While it is not our district (#1) it is interesting nonetheless:
    http://www.smdailyjournal.com/articles/lnews/2015-04-11/four-enter-race-for-supervisor-race-starting-early-north-county-residents-only-to-vote-in-2016-district-election/1776425141544
    Here is the map as it sits right now–and we did not get lumped in with Pacifica in the final draw: http://bos.smcgov.org/

  6. Former Supervisor Ruben Barrales is back

    I would like to hear from both The Democratic Party and The Republican Party on their opinion of redistricting.
    In the County Board of Supervisors world, Ruben Barrales (former supervisor) is back in the Bay Area with strong support from The Republican Party and its major donors.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruben_Barrales
    It’s time that the thousands of Republicans, Conservatives, and Libertarians get off the couch, get aware and involved in your community and its leadership opportunities and to restore the balance and debate necessary to enable a true democracy, or at least a representative republic.
    Ruben’s a stud – check him out!

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading