Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

SmartMeter Debate – Part 3

The Daily Journal is reporting:

SAN FRANCISCO — California regulators will ask Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to set up a process so its customers can opt out of smart meters if they have concerns about the devices’ potential health effects.

California Public Utilities Commission President Michael Peevey says he will ask the utility to develop the proposal over the next two weeks.

Peevey’s announcement came before dozens of people and advocacy groups testified at Thursday’s commission meeting that exposure to radio frequencies and radiation from the wireless electricity and gas meters was harming people’s health.

PG&E maintains that the meters are safe. Other PUC commissioners have said they want to see more research on whether the electronic meter-reading system can impact health.

Peevey says he believes PG&E should allow customers to opt out for a “reasonable cost”.

The key here is "reasonable cost" which I believe will be considered high by many residents simply because the costs themselves will be high–the cost to have a person walk down the street and read a couple of meters here and there manually.  We considered the meters' accuracy here.

Posted in

5 responses to “SmartMeter Debate – Part 3”

  1. Led rør

    Vores løsninger giver store muligheder for besparelser på jeres elregning. Hvis du vil have en indikation på, hvor stor jeres energibesparelse kan blive, så udfyld vores online beregningsskema og få et hurtigt

  2. pat giorni

    Burlingame continues to be envied the world over…we even get spam from Denmark.
    Tee Heehee

  3. Editor

    Left in place for your entertainment!

  4. Joe

    Today’s SF Examiner is reporting on the opt-out process:
    Drowning out a chorus of boos and hisses from angry audience members, the state’s utility watchdog approved a plan Wednesday that would charge fees to residents who want to opt-out of PG&E’s contentious SmartMeter program.
    Residents who elect to abstain from the digital energy readers will have to pay a one-time fee of $75 and a subsequent monthly bill of $10, as part of the plan authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission.
    Read more at the San Francisco Examiner: http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/2012/02/pge-customers-must-pay-opt-out-smartmeters#ixzz1lG640vd0

  5. Vermonter

    BENNINGON, Vt. (AP) — Four southern Vermont towns have passed nonbinding resolution opposing the use of so-called “smart meters,” but Central Vermont Public Service says it will continue installing the wireless digital electrical meters as scheduled.
    Voters in Bennington, Dorset, Manchester and Sandgate approved resolutions during floor meetings or by ballot. Smart-meter opponents say the devices pose health risks and raise privacy concerns.
    Central Vermont Power spokesman Steve Costello told the Bennington Banner (http://bit.ly/zgbAgA) that the utility has already installed some of the new meters in Rutland County and that everything remains on track to connect about 160,000 of them in time.
    The utility says the meters are perfectly safe.

Leave a Reply

RECENT COMMENTS

RECENT POSTS

CATEGORIES

ABOUT THE VOICE

The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026