Criticizing San Francisco is an honored tradition on the Peninsula.  John Horgan called "BS" on the pay-a-toll-to-drive-into-SF idea and was right to do so.  County Supervisor-wannabe Gina Papan is in today's SF Examiner criticizing some local-hiring bill, but that's not what caught my eye.  Papan's bio reads:

Gina Papan, serving her second term on the Millbrae City Council, works as a deputy state attorney general, and is a candidate for San Mateo County Supervisor District 1.

I've followed Gina's doings for years and this is the first I've heard that she works for the state attorney general (that would be Gov.-elect Jerry Brown).  What exactly does she do for the State?  And how does that fit with being a council member or even a County Supe?  Didn't Jerry sue the Bell, CA councilmembers for paying themselves gazillons?  Is Gina an "active" deputy state attorney and what workload is she handling?  This seems very interesting and I hope the Examiner will ask the questions that need to be asked.