Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Local Mary Hunt poses an excellent question in a Letter to the Editor in the Daily Journal. It goes like so:

Question: While our state budget crisis deepens and the state is forced to defer payments to schools and vendors, what will our lame-duck governor Arnold Schwarzenegger be doing to help resolve the worst budget crisis in decades?

Answer: Our governor will be AWOL — taking a trade junket to China, Japan and South Korea from Sept. 9 to Sept. 15 (This is also the period for the governor to decide the fate of hundreds of bills recently passed by the Legislature). That’s bad enough. But there’s more reason for concern: Traveling with the governor will be the new CEO of the High-Speed Rail Authority, Roelof van Ark. This gives credence to the talk that Gov. Schwarzenegger wants China to invest tens of billions of dollars to make up the huge investment shortfall that many experts predict in the funding of California’s high-speed rail system. Why would China invest tens of billions of dollars in a project that — according to our state treasurer— Wall Street investors are, “convinced that no one can finance the routes from Los Angeles to the Bay Area?” That question needs to be answered, not in the California governor’s office, but in the president’s National Security Council.


Mary L. Hunt

And a guest opinion in the Chronicle hits on another aspect of the private investment needed

those investors will need to see a potential return. The hitch? The way the phasing or building of the system is currently proposed may not produce a return.

And the proposal which is quite logical is

The cost to build the 30 miles from Los Angeles to Anaheim and the 50 miles from San Francisco to San Jose is estimated at $9.9 billion. I suggest a less risky approach: Build the Bakersfield to Merced segment first.

At an estimated cost of $6.75 billion for the 168 miles, the third segment is cheaper to build per mile ($40.2 million) than the other segments. Also, by extending the third segment an additional 114 miles to Sacramento, the state would tap the largest travel market in the state, within and between the San Joaquin Valleyand major California cities.

This plan would create a viable showcase of high-speed rail that could help generate the outside investment needed to complete the system.

Is anyone at the CHSRA listening?  Do their calculators even work?

Posted in

5 responses to “High Cost Rail – Part 30 – Arnold’s Travels”

  1. JF

    So Whitman and fiorina need to win to bury HSR. Is that a correct statement? O don’t want to leave them any wriggle room.

  2. Joe

    I don’t think Fiorina matters either way, but getting Meg Whitman elected governor is critical. The governor nominates a majority of the High-speed Rail Authority and a majority of the High-speed rail authority NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. Let’s dump Kopp, Diridion, Pringle and maybe a couple more. Now. Jerry Brown is a Peninsula disaster waiting to happen. Electing Whitman is the single best chance we have to avoid an local environmental disaster.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading