Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Here is another article on home sizes across the nation from CNBC.  I'm not sure the word has reached Burlingame yet.  One pithy quote is

In the past few years, there have been an increasing number of references made to the “McMansion glut” and the “McMansion backlash,” as more towns pass ordinances against garishly large homes, which are generally over 3,000 square feet and built very close together.

What sets a McMansion apart from a regular mansion, according to Wikipedia, are a few characteristics: They’re tacky, they lack a definitive style and they have a “displeasingly jumbled appearance.”

And another quote that could easily apply in B'game

“McMansions just look and feel out of place today, given the more cautious environment everyone’s living in,” said Paul Bishop, vice president of research for the National Association of Realtors.

 

Posted in

5 responses to “CNBC Obit for McMansions”

  1. Joanne

    Yes, I just read this and was thinking of all the McMansions being built in Burlingame.
    Was hoping this would get posted.

  2. pat giorni

    I have kept track of every new R-1 zoned house built in town since 2000. By my count there are 207. That does not include the number of Substantial Reconstructions, whereby more than 51% of the house is removed…and let’s be real, that ususlly means there are a dozen or so “original” timbers left “intact”, and by the time of completion it is essentially a new house bearing absolutely no relation to the original dwelling. This count also does not include apartment or condo buildings. When I get a chance in the next few weeks I will post the addresses and architects probably here as well in posting “Another bites the dust”.

  3. hillsider

    Lemme guess–more than 51% McMansions on postage stamps.

  4. Mike

    It’s somewhat puzzling that there seems to be such repudiation of new construction in Burlingame. A good number of the older houses being replaced look run-down, are small 1-story 2 bedroom homes, have no architectual significance (were the tract homes of the 1920s – 1930s or 40s-50s), and anyone who has spent any time in them would attest to their shoddy construction, lack of insulation, creaky floors, etc.
    While I agree that some of the newer home styles do bear some similarities (not all of them do), in many cases they look much better than what they replaced, and construction/quality wise, could easily remain standing and be maintained in good, liveable condition for 100+ years.
    I wonder how many of such negative comments on new construction arise out of “house-envy” versus objectively assessing the before/after.

  5. holyroller

    There was a flurry of McMansions built for about a year or two.
    However, Burlingame being a “real small town city” neighbors,and the City Elders, saw through the BS:Stopped It.
    There are some really good contractors in Burlingame that have made a huge impact on maintaining the neighborhood/ family atmosphere that make the property values what they are, as well as the “First Class Service” provided by the Administration, Public Works, Park & Recreation.(the trees in this town are unbelevabley special)
    When I tell my friends that I can ask for help,(from “City Hall”) a question, or to complain about something, no matter how big or small;a real person gets back to me, and answers my concern.
    It is hard to believe.
    Living in Burlingame “You Get What You Pay For”

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading