Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Heather's article in the Daily Journal – School chief under fire

Tears were shed, ideas were shared, fingers were pointed and the superintendent's resignation was demanded as community members had their first chance to vent frustrations over the $3.5 million in budget cuts to be made next week by the San Mateo Union High School District. At a packed meeting held last night at the San Mateo High School gym, the community was given three possible options of cuts for this year's budget. Two options were dependent on the teachers and classified staff agreeing to take a salary rollback. Currently, both unions are standing firm against the salary cuts. In light of the stance, the district staff recommended a third option, which would eliminate 61 full-time employee positions affecting both classified and credentialed staff. The loss of these positions will affect more people than numbers represent, since the hours part-time employees work are combined to create many full-time equivalent positions. No cuts were made as a final decision will be made Sept. 28.

Many speakers asked Superintendent Sam Johnson, along with other district staff, to resign or take a very different paths to financial recovery. Suggestions included using the district property as collateral for a loan, re-examining the new seven-period day and for the district to resist cuts until more options could be considered. Board members requested more information about the given suggestions. Regardless of the ideas, the well-being of the students was everyone's top priority. There is a rift between the teachers and the district. A rift that we [the students] are caught in between. … I am calling for an end to the damaging rift. Our teachers should be respected and valued for all the time, effort and love they put into their work,? said student Trustee Mitra Anoushiravani.

The meeting was plagued with problems as it began in an overcrowded room that was shut down by the fire marshal. Hundreds of concerned citizens were moved to the San Mateo High School gym to accommodate the crowd a move that caused the meeting to begin an hour behind schedule. Many board members chose not to make any comment after the long line of speakers protested the cuts, requested different routes be considered and demanded answers for the decisions creating the dire situation.

A number of incorrect property tax projections, county tax rebates, rising special education costs and late notifications led to the district's current deficit position, said Associate Superintendent Liz McManus. A complicated situation she previously described as the perfect storm? of financial problems. There was no perfect storm. We just did not read the weather report,? said Burlingame High School teacher Kevin Nelson. The County Office of Education is requiring the district to create a plan to end the year with $2 million in its reserve still $700,000 shy of the legally required 3 percent reserve by Sept. 29. If the superintendent's office did not fully understand, by the start of the school year, the extent of this crisis then their hastily assembled proposals for a so-called solution are panic driven and ill considered. The district, by its own reporting, has not had time to make well deliberated decisions,? said Barbara Regan, Capuchino High School special education teacher who was representing Teachers for Fiscal Responsibility the group asking for Johnson's resignation.

This week, high school teachers facing the choice of having their salaries cut or losing colleagues to layoffs began protesting the choice by cutting off voluntary activities such as extra help for students, club supervision and locking their classroom doors during lunch. Johnson said the district's effort is to keep the cuts away from students. He said he was dismayed to learn teachers were not available to help students. There are life lessons of responsibility and sacrifice for the greater good, which students are missing out of because of such protesting, he said. Students were dismayed at the idea that any cuts would not effect their everyday lives. You seem to think by firing teachers you're not harming students. I don't know, because we're not the ones getting fired? … You'll see the test scores drop. You'll see it on paper. There are better ways to go about it than this,? said San Mateo sophomore Edan Freiberger.

Individuals made pleas for the various programs like libraries, music and special education teachers. Dorian Evers and Zaina Arslan, student leaders from Hillsdale High, presented a protest signed by 400 students to preserve the small learning communities. Monica Peck walked in front of the crowd with a large poster that read, I was fired.? The Capuchino High special education teacher received notice earlier this month that Sept. 22 would be her final day. This week the district asked Peck to stay on through Sept. 28. Peck is one of many who joined the district this summer, drawn to its higher pay and special education program. A list of 149 suggested cuts was compiled and chopped down to create the proposals presented. The proposal recommended to the board includes firing temporary teachers, laying off campus aides, cutting maintenance and food service workers, letting an accompanist for the music classes go and reducing substitute teachers, administrative workers and technology support. The options calls for the district to tighten its own belt by utilizing e-mail rather than using paper, cutting the $20,000 cell phone bill, eliminating travel compensation, a $200,000 reduction in overtime, a $5,717 salary rollback by Johnson and a $100,000 cut in transportation. Trustee Linda Lees Dwyer proposed asking the community for donations and started the efforts by handing over a $1,000 check.

The school board votes on cuts 7 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 28 at the San Mateo Adult Resource Technology Center, 789 E. Poplar Ave., San Mateo.

###

Click here for the article in the San Mateo Times (plus photo)

– Written by Fiona

Posted in

39 responses to “SMUHSD Meeting on September 21”

  1. Anonymous

    Heather’s article if very well written and very accurate. This was a very emotional evening. Lots of students showed up in support of their schools and teachers, and that alone was worth the price of admission. This group needs to put their heads together and figure out something other than Option 3.

    Why, if this was supposedly an input session, had they already figured out exactly what they were planning on cutting beforehand? Or, since the time between 6 and 7 was spent trying to relocate hundreds of people, did we lose out on the session for input?

    Couldn’t Mr. Johnson or the Board have deduced that we would require a larger space? Afterall, this has happened at least three or four times that I have experienced in the recent past, and even more people showed up to this one.

    Proper planning seems to be a real problem in this district, whether it is arranging for a facility in advance, or a making a realistic budget.

    Poor Elizabeth McManus, who has inherited this mess, really tried hard with her graphs and presentation, but it was way too much material for the crowd to absorb in the short session, and the portable screen was almost illegible to those higher up in the stands. (And I have good eyesight.)

    Finally, what on earth was Associate Sup. Avelar (SP?) doing, getting up and down and leaving the building several times? Was he getting phonecalls? Couldn’t he take all the emotion? Whatever the case, this was incredibly rude and disrespectful behavior that even my child noticed.

  2. guest

    Mr. Avelar was instructed by Mr. Johnson to call the police so that speakers who refused to leave the podium would be escorted out of the gym.

  3. Joanne

    Is there any reason why a current SMUHSD teacher could not run for one of the school board positions?

  4. Anonymous

    Joanne,
    He/she would have an innate conflict of interest in voting on his/her own compensation…

  5. KRN

    The District Administration was advised two weeks ago that the Smart Center would not be large enought to hold the crowd. The Administration stated that they “tried” to get the Performing Arts Center but it was booked. The District was given PLENTY of advanced notice that they needed to move the meeting.

    Many people commented that the District’s planning for the meeting was like their planning for the budget, they were given lots of information and warning but decided not to pay attention to any of it.

    This is a mess. The speaker with the most insight was Doug McGlashen from Aragon. A former lawyer, McGlashen urged to Board to not fire any teachers or classified staff and simply not rebuild the reserves in a single year. The reserves can be built up over a period of years and students would not be disrupted. The choice MAY put the district into receivership by the County, but there has NEVER been a basic aid district placed into receivership. McGlashen’s suggestion is the best one on the table and save student, teachers, and staff. It will require cuts in other areas and more creative budgeting in the future. The SMUHSD Board needs to meet with the County Sup and get this plan into action.

  6. anon

    It seems that Doug McGlashen did forward a good idea — but would we just be postponing (again) the fiscal problem. This is one idea the board of supervisors should persue!!

    On another note, I do not feel sorry for teachers who were recently hired These are adults who maid a career decision.
    They get the benefit of ‘union’ tenure if they are retained after 18 months and unfortunately have suffer any consequences before that time.

    Lastly, perhaps Mark Avelar should be relieved of his duties – as I do not see his value to the district

  7. sue

    Mr. Avelar is an ex football coach turned assistant superintendent. I have found him to be less than knowledgable and/or helpful/insightful in all meetings I have been a part of, and this includes several meetings I have had with him on my own. Just one of several changes that should be made, in my opinion.

  8. Rich Grogan

    I was please to see the pictures in the local newspapers showing the FABULOUS turnout of parents, teachers, and students.

    Moving forward, public participation of everyone effected by the District’s actions is something that needs to happen at ALL School Board Meetings/gatherings etc. It is time parents, teachers, voters, and students take control of the District and their future.

    Was anyone else surprised when Mr. Johnson refused to take accountability of this mess and passed it off onto the County’s officials?

  9. KRN

    Here is a link to Channel 7 News coverage of the evening.

    http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&id=4588244

    The parents at Capuchino High School are not only organized, but are acting. They have letter writing campaigns in place and are moving on the Board and the Administration.

  10. anon

    Mark Avelar must be having a wonderful time right now, as he always seems to change sides – sometimes with the administration, sometimes with the teachers. I wonder which side he is on today?

    We could save teachers and help our students by using Mark Avelar’s salary.

  11. Ed Larios

    Sue:

    Yes Mark Avelar was a Football, basketball and baseball coach at El Camino. But he was also a high school principal as well. I have found him to be well-versed in his role as Assoc. Sup. of Instruction and he was an excellent Principal at both El Camino and Aragon. He is knowlegeable about all curriculum areas and his being a football coach gave him an insight to what a comphensive High School should be. This insight made him a very successful principal. However, as a Assoc Superintendent he has to stay in step with the man in charge. Therefore he must take responsiblity for his part in the decision making process that has led to the crisis

  12. sue

    Ed,
    I am only referring to how poorly he performs as an assistant superintendent……..I don’t care how he performed as a principal or as a football coach. I can only speak to the dealings that I have had with him in board meetings and in 1:1 meetings that have concerned me and my kids. I repeat that I have found him to be less than understanding/insightful/knowledgeable and/or professional in his demeanor or presentation.
    As an assistant superintendent it is his job to do what HE thinks is best, NOT to “stay in step with the man in charge.” That just tells me that my feelings about him are correct. If he were insightful and knowledgeable and did his job, maybe the district wouldn’t be in the predicament it is in. Gotta go with your heart and do what is right, no matter who is in charge. Maybe he should go back to football.

  13. ASE

    For all those who are interested:
    Students will be outside of the Board Meeting next Thursday evening selling t-shirts that say ” ‘Shoot first, aim later.’ -Sam Johnson” to show our disapproval of his leadership. Since I don’t yet know how many people would be interested and how many shirts to order, if anybody would like to buy one please let me know through this forum.
    I am also calling for anyone who knows the name of the Capuchino High School PTA president. I would like to contact them and hopefully allign with their large group of motivated parents. However,they have proven so far to be very difficult to track down.
    Thank you for the help and support.

  14. Anonymous

    Dear ASE,

    I think it’s best to stick to the individual messages on picket signs, rather than uniform tees that make personal attacks on Johnson. I don’t think the uniform ‘mob’ look would be a good idea. To the contrary, it dillutes your message.

    If you are a student, remember that although this group has not done its job well and has greatly disappointed us, they still do deserve some dignity. This is the San Mateo Union High School District, the fine district from which I also graduated. I’ll tell you honestly that we just don’t stoop that low, no matter how angry we get. Personal attacks are beneath the students and teachers in this district, I am sure. Just stick to the point and don’t make it personal.

  15. JD

    Jen,

    Did you see the young woman crying the other night because her fiance lost his job after leaving a good job. Did you hear the mother of the special ed student who believes that her son’s life may be changed because is teachers will be fired. Did you listen to the classified staff tell you that they will lose their healthcare when they lose their jobs. This is ALL Sam Johnson’s fault.

  16. Anonymous

    Yes, I was there until the bitter end, and it was heart wrenching. I’ve also been to previous meetings where this group ignored the public.

    It is Sam Johnson’s fault, as well as his Associates who said everything would be fine, as well as the Board’s, who appointed him. They are all culpable. Still, I would refrain from personal attacks on any of them; it degrades you, not him. You can still be successful in getting your message across and keeping your dignity.

    Just my Opinion…..

  17. ASE

    Jen, I understand that you have your opinion. I ask you to understand that I have my own. Our efforts are not to point fingers, but to to remind the public that Sam Johnson may apply his “shoot first, aim later” theory to recovering our finances. In fact, he seems to be willing to shoot the teachers, when he will find out later that this means aiming at us, the students. And after all is said and done, no matter what decision is made about the budget next week, we want to remind everyone that nothing says the the proud Mr. Johnson won’t use his same hasty tactics in the future. He seems to believe that he has done nothing wrong, and we’d like to remind him and everyone else that he cannot be trusted, lest he make the same mistakes again.

  18. Rich Grogan

    If cutting positions becomes a reality I would like to suggest the District, School Board, etc start with anyone whose title starts with ASSISTANT OR VICE. This should free up some money for the much needed teacher positions.

    We, still, have not found out what the pay and benefits for School Board Members are.

  19. anon

    I believe the budget crisis we are in is a direct result of poor planning by both our school board and administrators.
    However, I am totally apposed to any T shirts that has the has the word ‘shoot’ or ‘aim’ and our superintendents name. With a mob mentality, this could spell disaster.
    I agree with Jen, Personal attacks are beneath the students and teachers in this district, I am sure. Just stick to the point and don’t make it personal. We are above this rhetoric!

  20. anon 2

    As far as mark avelar goes, he may have been a good coach, nice principal etc… but he is very slippery when it comes to what he really believes is good for students. He really plays both ends (union – administration) depending who he is talking to.

  21. Anonymous

    I have a question. When the teachers were hired, did thier temporary status provide a full time job for the entire current school year with full salary and benefits? If so is the district responsible for the salary and benefits for the remaineder of the year? Can they just legally lay them off before the contract is up?
    Jeriann

  22. steve

    Whatever the board decides about the immediate crisis will be difficult and painful for both the students and teachers. With the layoffs there will be a ripple effect among all schools as essential services are cut even further. Over the past several years to fund the seven period day schools have fewer custodians, fewer counselors per student, fewer teachers who coach, and fewer support personnel at each site. The only thing there are more of is students in each classroom, Associate Superintendents in the District Office, and teachers in the unemployment lines.

    The loss of support will be devastating for most schools. With the budget cuts there will be NO support at the site level for the more than 120 computers at each site, as well as NO librarian in the library, NO Dean to supervise the campus, and NO supplies for athletics at all. In fact already teams had to use student funds to buy their own balls to practice with.

    There has been a lot of talk of whether or not this was the fault of the seven period day. I think the answer is obvious. Whether or not it is at fault, it was a bad choice to implement this new costly program at a time of increasing costs in other areas.

    One interesting fact is that even with the tax rebates, total General Fund Revenue actually increased last year, and taken with the fact that the average teacher is less experienced in the SMUHSD than 10 years ago the District should be ahead of the game.

    With all that has occurred in the past several years, especially with the current administration’s forging ahead without heeding the consequences, I believe it is time that the Board look for new management to find long term solutions to our problems.

  23. concerned parent

    I agree BIG CUTS should begin at the district office – which will leave more money for our school sites and teachers. (could we save additional money by cutting a few district school board members, too??)

    I DISAGREE with the t-shirt idea — it is mean spirited & could be dangerous; it tarnishes the message about SMUHSD parents and students expecting a fiscally & responsibly managed school district, with our students as the beneficiaries – not the ones caught in the middle.

  24. Ed

    I found this passage while searching for “What is the Role of a School Board Trustee?”

    “Parents and other community members exercise their voice in public education control through the election of the board of trustees. Board members are guardians of the public trust and, through the policies that they make, are ultimately responsible for the success or failure of local public education.”

  25. RCC

    ASE,

    I have to say I think your t-shirts will make the perfect point. It will show that people and more importantly students aren’t okay with what Mr. Johnson is doing and has done to this school district and most importantly how his mistakes and those of the board have hurt STUDENTS. To those of you who continue to lambaste ASE, he/she is just a student trying desperately to be heard. No one is listening to the students. If anything adults of the community should be happy and proud of students willing to speak up for what they believe in, isn’t that what we’ve been trying to teach them? Lastly what does a company do when earnings have become deficit and the business as a whole is suffering, well if they have any sense they get rid of the CEO and his/her constitutes and bring in more efficient leadership. As Ms. McManus explained to the masses last Thursday evening we are in the people business why don’t we run it efficiently?

    RCC.

  26. student X

    I too am a student in the district and as i grow up i realize again and again that the world in which i live in is not all fluffy clouds and rainbows and eating cupcakes with cherubs. The people who make mistakes which affect others need to take responsibility for said mistakes. I think the majority of us have concluded that Mr. Johnson is largely responsible. We need him to know that we see through his rhetoric. The current students, the future students, the parents, and staff need Mr. Johnson to step down. We’ve asked. Do we stop just because he refuses? i would hope that my generation hasn’t already been conditioned to give up after one denial. In my point of veiw, ASE and our peers are simply coming back stronger.

  27. Joanne

    This is a test. I have been blocked twice now from posting and I am curious to know whether there is some censorship occurring on the blog.

  28. Joanne

    I will try once more to make a point. It is addressed to Student X (and to everyone who wants Mr. Johnson’s head):
    It is clear that some want Mr. Johnson’s head, but I’m not sure what the charges are. Is it that he instituted a seven period day and we don’t like it? Is it that the classes are increased now and we don’t like that? Or is that he was fiscally irresponsible?
    If the reason is fiscal irresponsibility, I’d like everyone to consider the following: At least three professionals thought that the SMUHSD’s budget was workable — even after the latest tax rebate. The first finance guy did. The second person was the second finance person for the SMUHSD who was hired last summer. At last Thursday’s meeting she stated that when she took over she thought the reserves could slowly be built back up over time (now that the tax rebates have apparently ended). The third person who thought the budget was workable was the teacher from Aragon, who advocated that the SMUHSD do nothing. He advocated this, not so that the pain of no-paycheck could be postponed until Spring, but because he, too, felt like the SMUHSD could meet its obligations this year and build back its reserves over time.
    I sat with two teachers last Thursday from another high school. I didn’t know either of them before but we started chatting once certain teachers starting calling for Mr. Johnson’s termination. They were clearly embarrassed by this and did not think it was a good idea. They think Johnson is a “good man,” they love their school, they think the seven period day can properly be financed now that the tax rebates have stopped. They asked what good it would do to fire Johnson. How would that solve the current crisis? They did not see that as a solution. They said they wished their union were trying to negotiate a compromise with the county — asking it whether it would approve less drastic cuts.

  29. student X

    it is all of the above. it is his inability to do anything for the district that conflicts with his own desires and attempts to create a legacy, along with the inability to take responsibilty for his actions. i agree with you that the other members of the board are also culpable. Primarily though, Mr. Johnson is at the front of the list. i don’t know him, i can’t comment on his character. i would hope that at the core, he is a good man. For if he isn’t, what kind of electorate are we to elect a board that sits with a bad man in charge of the schools

  30. Anonymous

    I would answer Joanne’s above question the following way:

    This administration lacks a couple of very important skills: They don’t do due diligence, and worse, they don’t seem interested in reaching out for some kind of consensus (with those affected) on various issues.

    In my opinion, this is at least as important as scrutinizing a budget– Do your research, report the facts (with defendable information), get people enthusiastic and behind your ideas. Whenever feasible, try to consider and respect all stakeholders: the parent community, the teacher community, and the student community, and of course, the taxpayers.

    Then (surprise!) a vast majority will support your decisions AND (bonus) they will work hard to help you achieve your goals. These could involve working together on a parcel tax, a bond, or other fund-raising–there needs to be buy in, first.

    But n this district, I have never witnessed this happen. The administration doesn’t show much interest in what the public thinks. I cannot speak for teachers, but I imagine that they have experienced the same, otherwise there wouldn’t be this much outrage on their part. E-mails and hand-written letters about various issues go unacknowledged. One point of view is presented and only one is considered.

    I don’t mind at all if someone disagrees with me, but at least have the courtesy to acknowledge that you’ve received my correspondence and what you think of it.

    The biggest gift of respecting the opinion of the school community and working together to achieve something, is that policies tend be successful. On the other hand, blunders like this budget deficit tend to be bumps in the road to be forgiven, rather than grounds to ask for a resignation. Everyone can make a mistake, but past history has a lot to do with how that mistake will be digested.

  31. Dr. Z Smith

    Is this not so strange that while public schools this year in California were supposed to have
    recieved more money? , they just end up’screwing’
    the whole budget again!
    Go ahead Ms. McManus , San Mateo Union School District deserves you. Cut, chop, and slash ,put it all in the reserves for four years.
    Reduce: support services
    Reduce : all salaries 40 %
    Increase : out of pocket Medical
    Reduce: Transportation
    Close 3 schools.
    Good Luck!

  32. Joanne

    Jen, your post was the best one I’ve read all day. I haven’t been around long enough to know whether or not I agree with your “failure to reach out” analysis. There is clearly a power struggle in the district between some teachers and the SMUHSD and one wonders if all the reaching out in the world would have had any impact on them if the decisions hadn’t gone their way. A head of any organization is hired to lead and Johnson has certainly done so. He made three big changes very quickly which have earned him lots of enemies: 1) he changed the school schedule to start earlier, 2) he put PE on a equal footing with other areas and thereby “reduced” sports from a PE-class to an outside-the-school day extra-curricular activity, and 3) he implemented the seven period day. This latest budget crisis is most unfortunate for a number of reasons, at least one of which is that it affords those who did not like the changes in 1, 2 and 3 to use the budget as a scapegoat to get rid of him. Did Mohr ever change anything with the teachers during his tenure, or did he just continue to fight the public for the bond measure and San Mateo High? I guess one change he made was to realign the district boundaries with city boundaries but that I doubt that that was very controverisal with the teachers.

  33. Joanne

    Geez, I forgot that he also implemented 4) the Academic Core, and 5) made Honors and AP classes available to anyone, without a teacher’s recommendation. Many folks agree with all those changes, but there is a small core of vehement opposers that are still fighting a rear guard action.

  34. KRN

    Joanne

    If by your own admission you ” haven’t been around long enough” how can you be sure that these changes are for the benefit of the school? You listed five issues above that earned him many enemies. Why do you think that these issues caused so much of a problem? By the way, A scapegoat is what Johnson is doing using the salary as an issue for the budget crisis.

    You mention leader. A leader takes responsibility for the incidents that occure under his leadership. This has yet to occur. If Mr. Johnson had stepped up on Day 1 and taken responsibility for this crisis he might have gotton some support. But no. He blamed everyone under the sun for the problem and then delivered a public speech aimed at dividing the teachers and clerical staff (clerical are the sacrficial lambs and teachers are greedy) while calling for collaboration in finding a solution. How is that leading? This all took place BEFORE the public comment period.

  35. Joanne

    I should have mentioned a sixth reason that some teachers don’t like Johnson: He apparently was the union negotiator for the district before he was promoted.
    KRN, I see the workload that my son has and I am quite capable of making the decision that I like semester to end before the Holidays. After seeing students save spots in their day for a sport, and then not making the team, I also see the wisdom in moving sports outside the school day. I can understand the difference between PE as a course for credit and football not being part of a course for credit. One is capable of making an opinion on these matters without having taught in the district for 20 years.
    I am also capable of reading this blog and also capable of seeing that there are actually very few people who contribute to it. You often use different aliases. I post under the same name. So any intelligent reader of this blog would not make an informed opinion on whether all the teachers in the SMUHSD hate Johnson based upon reading this…..As I mentioned, I met some teachers from another high school last week….and, although they were obviously concerned about the current situation — as everyone is — they had a VERY different perspective on Johnson and the other issues.

  36. Anonymous

    Sneaky ol’ KRN.

    Sounds like some Union irregularities are afoot.

  37. Anonymous

    Joanne, do you mean before he was promoted to vice Super, or even before that?

  38. Joanne

    Jen, I’m assuming you are asking about when Sam Johnson was the management rep in union negotiations? I’m basing that statement on something KRN wrote under “The Board Vote was Not Unanimous Thread.” He said that 8 years ago, Johnson negotiated the salary increases….

  39. Anonymous

    Thanks, then it must have been as Associate Super. I’m wondering if that is what Avelar does now as Associate Super?

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026