Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

School cuts force teachers to shut out students (Daily Journal)

High school teachers facing the choice of having their salaries cut or losing colleagues to layoffs are protesting the unpalatable choice by cutting off voluntary activities such as extra help for students, club supervision and locking their classroom doors during lunch.
Our organization stands ready to help the district resolve its financial problem. However, we will resist having solutions imposed on the teachers, especially those that will damage the quality of our academic program. The layoff of new teachers and a significant reduction in teachers' pay will damage the future of our high schools and our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified new teachers,? said Craig Childress, San Mateo High School District Teachers Association president.

Salary negotiations between the union and San Mateo Union High School District began Sept. 14. The district needs to cut $3.5 million of its budget by Sept. 28. One option is a salary cut for teachers an option that cannot be made without the union's approval. The two groups have come to a standstill as the district stands firm that teachers need to accept a 3 percent pay cut or lose 25 teachers. If a group … agrees to a cut they get credit for that rollback and fewer teachers will have to be laid off,? said board President Marcia Cohn-Lyle. Layoffs will be necessary if an agreement isn't made by next week's final cut date, she said. The plan of attack: make cuts. Final cuts will be made Sept. 28. Teachers assume a certain number of layoffs are inevitable, giving the group no incentive to take the cut. A 3 percent cut would pan out to roughly $1.2 million, meaning further cuts would need to be made, Childress said. The group, not willing to take the cut, offered a zero percent raise package with higher benefit co-pays. The group offered other concessions as well, such as paying a teacher for substitute teaching one period. Their offer was not accepted. The district made an offer to the teachers yesterday. The two sides are set to continue negotiations Tuesday, Sept. 26. Union leaders are encouraging teachers to stop doing all voluntary, non-essential duties until negotiations become a two-way street an effort that began at all high schools on Tuesday. This means not working with students before or after school or during lunch time and no more volunteering to lead clubs. Teachers at Burlingame High School put up a flier explaining the locked doors.

This isn't the first time the district was forced to make large cuts. Cohn-Lyle remembered a similar incident in 1995 when $2 million in cuts needed to be made. Similar protests were made at the time. It's nothing new,? said Cohn-Lyle. Last time [cuts were made teachers] closed the doors to their classrooms at lunch time and thank goodness we live in the United States and we can do these things as an acceptable method of complaining.?

– Written by Fiona

Posted in

15 responses to “It’s Nothing New?”

  1. Joanne

    “It’s nothing new?”?!!! I had the same reaction, Fiona. Maybe this latest disaster will prompt some able people to run for school board next time; these aren’t “fluff” positions…the public relies on a board that will do the work, question the policies and numbers and ensure results.

  2. Anonymous

    Are Board positions paid? What kind of board is this? It seems like this group has been around the block too many times to take anything seriously. What a ridiculous remark.

  3. Anonymous

    President – Marcia Cohn Lyle (Term: 2003-2007)

    Vice President – Linda Lees Dwyer (Term: 2005-2009)

    Clerk – Peter H. Hanley (Term: 2005-2009)

    Trustee – Robert H. Griffin (Term: 2005-2009)

    Trustee – Diane J. Vranes (Term – 2003-2007)

    Student Representative – Mitra Anoushiravani (AHS) Fall 2006

    Student Representative – Jeevan Mahal (AHS) Spring 2007

    The School Board has been deafening in their silence!

  4. Anonymous

    Several of these folks have been there for years, except for Linda. The laissez-faire attititude of “been there, done that” helps to explain how they could have spent themselves into a hole without seeming to take notice.

  5. sue

    It is also interesting to note how few of the current member have children in the SMUHSD. Do they really have a vested interest? I doubt it. Most are unimpressive, to say the least.

  6. Anonymous

    Joanne’s remark is right on the money. Unlike Burlingame city council, these people faced virtually no competition in the past election. It’s fine to say they’re the ones we elected, but there wasn’t much of an alternative on offer last time around (unless you think “Sammy” would have been a better choice).

    Maybe this fiasco will result in some fresh faces running for school board. I wonder what John Root is doing these days…

  7. Anonymous

    In regards to Jens question…
    Day one..
    Council members recieve life time medical benefits for themselves and one spouse. Plus dental up to 1700.00 per year. Doubled for spouse with children. Being a council member for “The City of Burlingame” is like winning the Lottery. Blog members/readers only have to ask the “right questions”.

    I think that once that information becomes public knowledge, we will see more people enter the political arena.

  8. Anonymous

    Thanks Tucson, but I was actually referring to SMUHSD Board of Trustees! As Ian states, I think there aren’t ever any fresh faces running, and that is why we get the same batch over and over. So I was curious if this position was paid a stipend, or had any benefits. To whom are they accountable? Is it strictly a volunteer community position? The only thing I know (at least I’m fairly sure of) is that this group appoints the Superintendent.

  9. KRN

    If the district cuts 25 teachers, then who is going to teach your children? The district has a plan that will move teachers from school to school and your students schedules will look like a circus. There is discussion that the schools may have to re-run all of the students schedules from scratch. New schedules, new classes, new teachers, and new problems. The teachers are not going to take the pay cut.

    This entire mess is a result of the implementation of the 7 period day without proper financial backing. The County Sup warned the SMUHSD Administration not to proceed, but they ignored her. Now she is making them listen.

  10. Skeptic

    KRN and everyone else: I have looked at a lot of the budget figures and the reasons we got in this mess is due to more than just the 7th period costs that should have been funded by parcel taxes/foundations.

    The District has signed some contracts with everyone, teachers, administrators, and staff that they cannot afford. From 2002 through this year health benefits have increased from about $ 5.1 million to $ 9.6 million. This is an increase of about $ 800,000 to 900,000 a year. Last year there was an overpayment of about $ 2.6 million total in compensation (this was based on a formula in the contracts that pays a certain percentage of revenues as compensation). The teachers got some $ 1.8 million more than they should have, the Administration about $ 263,000 and other employees by about $ 568,000. Once this money is given away, it is difficult to get back.

    So, even though revenues have actually increased every year, expenses have increased more.

    The District simply can’t spend more than they take in. It’s not a debate over whether teachers, administrators or staff are being adequately compensated for what they do. The District simply can’t afford to pay as many people and give them benefits like they are
    under the existing contracts. It’s a choice of bankruptcy, laying off people or reducing some salaries and benefits.

    I also think the culpability is not just the administration’s. Personally, I can’t believe that the Union representatives who negotiated these contracts had no idea about the finances of the District and how the Contracts might affect them. Also, the Board of Trustees certainly has done a lousy job. If this was a private company, all these people might be up for a criminal indictment for what they have done. There should be a Sarbanes-Oxley for School Districts.

  11. Joanne

    Skeptic, thank you for taking the time to do the research and report in. You are providing a valuable public service and I hope you keep up the good work.

  12. Joanne

    PS…The San Mateo Daily Journal (smdailyjournal.com) has an article today that says its either 61 positions cut, or 31 cut and a 3 percent salary decrease for exisiting teachers. From what I hear, some schools will be impacted more than others.

  13. Joanne

    If the state legislature were a private company they’d also be up for a criminal indictment. Since you’re looking, Skeptic, does the SMUHSD have an unfunded pension issue that we have to worry about too?

  14. KRN

    As far as the union reps are concerned. We are still waiting for the books to revue the numbers. The district did not give them to us. Same for past contracts. We got the projections and a promise that we would be paid. The District is the steward of the budget, don’t go blaming the teachers.

  15. Rich Grogan

    Jen asked a very valid question regarding the compensation School Members receive.

    Does anyone happen to know?

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026