Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Cuts to bring layoffs, new school schedules (Daily Journal)

Burlingame special education English teacher, Steve Labrum, began his work day last Thursday like any other in class by 8 a.m. Two hours later, Labrum was fired. He was one of five temporary teachers who were told Sept. 22 would be their last day teaching in the San Mateo Union High School District. The cuts are just the beginning of what's to come at local high schools. Upcoming budget cuts are more than lost dollars it means new schedules for some students, a different routine for teachers, temporary teacher layoffs and countless other adjustments.

A number of incorrect property tax projections, county tax rebates, rising special education costs and late notifications led to the district's current deficit position, said Superintendent Sam Johnson. The County Office of Education is requiring the district to create a plan to end the year with $2 million in its reserve a feat that requiring the district to cut $3.5 million. The district is creating a list of suggested cuts to be reviewed and finalized by Sept. 21. The plan of attack: make cuts. The district is in the process of asking teachers, parents and staff for suggested cuts. All suggestions, even ones which would not change the situation, are put on a list. Currently, the list has 69 suggestions including reducing the number of temporary teachers, reducing after-school sports programs, cutting coaching stipends for winter and spring sports, increasing the number of special education students in a class and reducing security on campus. Final cuts will be made Sept. 28. Last week, the first round of temporary teachers one of the many budget items on the chopping block were given notice. Labrum began working at Burlingame in 2004 but is still considered a temporary teacher while he works on his credentials at San Francisco State University. For Labrum the news means he needs to start looking for another job but he doesn't know what will happen to his students. The kids are the ones who are going to be losing out and the other teachers who will have to pick up the slack, who have to plan another class,? he said.

More layoffs will happen through the end of the month. The loss of teachers will mean one of two things a teacher will need to step in and teach a new class or the students' schedules will be rearranged. Johnson hopes the reorganization will be worked out by the end of October. The district will attempt to find a teacher who can take on another class before it moves around students, said Johnson. With the new seven-period day, many teachers have a prep period as well as an alternative duty period time for the teacher to work on a special project. Teachers with this extra period could be asked to teach a class without a teacher for a stipend, said Johnson. There are a large number of teachers in a position to be assigned a fifth class. We certainly would talk to teachers but right of assignment is the administrative prerogative … We're working in unusual times. We're making some decisions that none of us would chose to make,? said Johnson. If a teacher cannot be found, students will need to be moved around. This could mean new classes and a new schedule for students in these classes. Principals are looking at these students' schedules to see who can be moved, said Johnson. There is no telling at this point how many students could end up with a new class schedule.

At Hillsdale High this reorganization of teachers and students could be detrimental to the school's small learning communities. Students at Hillsdale attend classes in one of four houses.? In each house the English, math, science and history teachers work with the same students. Each teacher is also responsible to monitor the progress of about 20 students. If we only had counselors there would be 500 students to one counselor. With 20 to 22 [students] to one [teacher] there is always an adult that can know every younger person in this school well. But that's what's in danger,? said 14-year English teacher Greg Lance. Creating a small school environment within a large student body took Hillsdale a number of years to complete. Since implementing the program a few years ago, the school has seen a significant raise in its test scores and an increase in students eligible for California universities. The school already cut the program for seniors this year in an effort to cut the budget. If teachers are let go at Hillsdale teachers will have less time to work together to create lesson plans and advise students. Basically, the new system at Hillsdale could collapse, Lance said. The district seems to be asking the faculty at Hillsdale to choose between protecting the financial health and well being of our families and the success of students who have typically been underserved in this district,? he said. This devil's bargain puts teachers in the unfair position of weighing the passion and commitment we naturally feel for our own families against the passion and commitment we also feel for our students and the new Hillsdale we have spent 10 laborious years creating.?

– Written by Fiona

Posted in

55 responses to “And the Cuts Begin …”

  1. Concerned

    The sad part of the story is that the incompetence of Sam Johnson and his inability to see that the seven period day was not feasible caused this and yet we aren’t discussing going back to the six period day nor putting Mr. Johnson where he belongs… in retirement

  2. M. Jones

    Our Librarians are on the cut list also. The loss of these positions will mean the end of the long established and valuable programs and services that credentialed Library Media Teachers provide. It will be a huge loss to the academic resources our schools provide. It has been shown over and over in many state sponsored studies that schools with professionaly trained Librarians and excellent libraries have higher achievement levels than schools without these resources. Libraries are not an “extra” that can be cut without a great loss to our students.

  3. BHSP

    The public does not know it yet but Johnson has a “burn the village in order to save it” plan. The District is planning mass lay-off and a grand reshuffling of teachers to cut the budget. There has yet to be ANY discussion of the end of the 7 period day.

    Implementing a balanced budget is not about saving the schools, it is about saving Johnson’s legacy. Let the schools be taken over by the County and throw Johnson out. He is out of touch with the community and has brought this budget crisis upon the district. He is now ruining the lives of staff, teachers, and students with his inept leadership. It is time for the public to step up and take control of our schools.

  4. jean

    I don’t think all the community agrees with you, BHSP, or with Mr. Johnson. I also don’t think the tone of your blog will solve anything, get you any closer to a solution, or give you strides with credibility.

    You need real people with real names from both sides to present solutions in a professional manner to the folks that make change.

  5. SK

    Mr. Johnson knew in Dec., as Sequoia district did, that there would be a budget shortfall, but ignored it and made no cuts, not even the 7 pd. day! He has been overspending since he took over in 2004. His over spending should be made public. He has charts on it…just ask.
    He is responsible for this and he should take the hit! Lets cut some administrators at the district office as well as Mr. Johnson, and investigate where the money has gone since 2004!

  6. jean

    SK, please inform us. Could you ask for the charts that you speak of and post them here with source, facts, and names? That would really help. Thanks.

  7. SK

    The district office had them…..for a presentation to the teachers last week. I dont have them…they should be made public. I guess the media should contact them

  8. Pete

    And so- Measure B?

    Are we going to give more “ammo” for the district to fire off into the ether?

    The problem with more money for the district is that they obviously feel free to spend OPM, (Other People’s Money,)in ways which they may not (I hope) spend their own.

    A little forced-economizing might be healthy.

    Pete

  9. BHSP

    Jean,

    The district has been in sad shape ever since Johnson took office. The pubic has been at Board meeting numerous times letting him know that they are not in favor of his one man show. The District’s plan is begining to leak out. They are going to to lay off a large number of teachers and reshuffle students.

    As far as the tone of my blog… Maybe you should talk to a few of the teachers who lost their jobs the other day or those who know they are about to lose their jobs. These people left stable jobs with benefits in other districts to come to the SMUHSD. They are now going to be unemployed because of Johnson’s blunders. The district is not interested in solutions. They are making the solutions themselves. They want a 3% paycut from their employees to solve a problem that they created. The district administration is not interested in solutions that are not on their priority list. Maybe the community will get upset when their children’s education is put in question. By the way… that time is now.

  10. BHSP

    These are the defic spending numbers for the SMUHSD as presented by the Asst Sup of Business

    2002-2003 ($1,920,000)
    2003-2004 $188,669
    2004-2005 ($1,672,000)
    2005-2006 ($2,329,000)
    2006-2007 ($2,317,000)

    The district has been deficit spending for 3 of the last four year. The projected deficit for 06-07 does not include increases for benefits and inflation.

    It is clear that the district should not have been increasing expenditures for a 7 period day when it is running this type of deficit.

  11. jean

    Please correct me if I am wrong..but it is my understanding that the teachers let go were well informed of their “temporary” status. So, if they left a stable job with benefits to come here for a temporary job, that was their choice.

    That said, I would love to talk to those teachers. Do you have any facts on them like name, contact, which district they came from? Are they upset, complaining, setting up meetings to discuss the decision with their boss, blogging here?

  12. Anonymous

    Our elected school board have been somewhat quiet through this whole thing. Do they have much say in what goes on? Could/did they say “wait a minute, do we have enough money to change to 7-period schedules”, etc?

  13. guest

    To answer Jeans question “temporary teachers” are aware of their temporary status. Temporary status means that they may or may not be rehired for the next school year.However they are notified in March of the new year weather they will be rehired or not for the next school year. This status still provides a full time job for the entire current school year with full salary and benefits. If they are not rehired they can spend the summer looking for another position in a different district.If there was even a mention that this could happen would they have accepted a position that might cause them to be be dismissed after one month.
    I would also like to mention that not one newly appointed administrator has been dismissed and all cuts mentioned directly affect the education a student receives in the classroom.

  14. jean

    Thanks, guest. That does help, and I can understand now how they would be upset if they did not have the summer to find employment.

  15. Anonymous

    Interesting that the district has hired a political “consultant” to help promote Bond Measure “M”. Doesn’t a consultant cost quite a bit of money, or is this done on a contingency basis?

  16. Pete

    Consultants are hired so you have someone to blame when things don’t work out.

    Bye-bye to Measure M.

  17. BHSP

    The bond itself is costing $125,000 plus the consultants. The district is also paying the former secretary of Tom Mohr $25,000 per year (she has a three year contract) to coordinate the Ribbon Cutting Ceremony and other odds and ends.

  18. Skeptic

    Facts: SMUHSD 2002-2003 Budget Report dated June 27, 2002 shows that in 2001 District had a $ 9,749,112 reserve. 2001-2002 deficit spending was ($ 4,830,768). Comments above show the other deficit spending for subsequent years. Folks, this district has been fiscally mismanaged for years, overspending and blowing away the reserve, and the present management has just carried on the tradition. Also, interestingly, the same 2002-2003 budget shows a reserve for “tax appeals” of $ 750,000, along with other reserves in addition to the required 3% reserve of $ 2,410,000 that year. In 2002-2003, the District had a $ 1,000,000 reserve for tax appeals. And in 2003-2004
    $ 900,000. What about 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 budgets – what is the reserve for tax appeals? Zero, Nada, Nil. Apparently, Mr. Johnson and the Board didn’t see the need for the prudent practice of keeping a reserve for tax appeal rebates. Where did they get the dollar numbers for the reserve for tax appeals in prior years. The information was available somewhere. The District propanganda that these tax rebates were a “surprise” and there was no way to plan for it is nonsense. These budget documents showing income, expenses and reserves are available at the District office for the asking. Look for yourself – 2006-2007 Annual Budget J-200 Report, Budget (Single Adoption) General Fund Unrestricted and Restricted Expenditures by Function, pages 13, 14; 2005-2006 Annual Report, General Fund 01, pages ix, x; 2004-2005, General Fund 01, pages ix, x; 2003-2004, pages 1 and 2 under Budget (Single Adoption) General Fund, Unrestricted and Restricted Expenditures by Function; 2002-2003 pages 3 and 4. I am wondering if District management has also overspent its last bond and needs proceeds from M to bail itself out. Besides, what good are grand new buildings, when you don’t have the money to properly run them day to day? It’s time for District management to blow away the smoke screen, come clean and admit to the real problem of overspending every year. The solution is proper balanced budgeting along with having a generous reserve every year to cover unforeseen contingencies.

  19. Soccer Mom

    Sam Johnson and the SMUHSD cancelled all the AYSO soccer games on the BHS fields this weekend so that they could hold the ribbon cutting ceremony. The smallest players have to miss a weekend of soccer so that the parking lot can be empty to host this event. I guess Sam forgot who provided the funds for the first bond that upgraded the school; the families with children playing soccer on the weekend. I bet that they won’t forget when the next bond comes out.

  20. james

    I hate to be a stick in the mud because I think we need to ditch the 7 period day and cut plenty of administrators, BUT if the financial trend has been clear for years and the cost of the new 7 period day was so troublesome, couldn’t a teacher who was about to be hired here figure this out too????? If we expected Johnson to figure it out, then why should the new hires be held to a lower standard???????

  21. KRN

    Teachers are not the finacial stewards of the districts. They are hired to a contract to work for a year. Every new teacher or any teacher should not have to be a budget analyst before they take a job.

  22. Anonymous

    Heck, it looks like the Board members don’t even look at the Budget! That isn’t the teachers’ job.

  23. jean

    In my career, I have only changed jobs/companies three times. I am not a budget analyst. But all three times I did my due diligence to ensure the company being considered was financially stable, and sustainable. Teachers don’t do that?

  24. Shill Silverbarb

    Ah, Bill Silverfarb’s silence is deafening. There is enough grist in this mill that a good investigative reporter would have been able to expose Sam Johnson’s mismanagement of the District’s funds years ago.

  25. Joanne

    I agree with you, Shill Silverbarb. We’ve all been arguing about the wrong thing for the last year (Should PE be required for athletes? Should teachers be credited for 1/5 of their teaching responsibilites if they coach? Does 5 minutes less per class period harm kids? Does the seven period day harm the high achievers at the expense of the low achievers? blah, blah, blah) All of this is irrelevant if there is no money. I had no idea that the SMUHSD was deficit spending since 2001 (as Skeptic above writes)or that the County Board of Education advised against the current budget. THAT’s the story that should have been center and front page. How can we possibly fault new teachers for not having done “due diligence” on the district? The SMUHSD’s lack of fiscal responsibility has been missed by the press, the parents and the board of trustees and the exisiting teachers (who both voted for the increased budget). The “perfect storm” of tax rebates appears to be just a small wind in an otherwise on-going hurricane of six years of declining financial stability.

  26. KRN

    The teachers did not vote for the increased budget. We do not get to vote on these issues! This is misleading. The teachers through their committee gave a conditional approval to the 7 period day ONLY if it was funded through a parcel tax.

    If you re-read through these blogs, you will find that teachers and others have acted in a very conservative manner in these changes and have opposed them, often citing budgetary constraints.

  27. Joanne

    My misunderstanding. I thought the 7th period day was only permissible if the teachers voted for it. (In effect giving the teachers had “veto” power). No wonder you’re upset…something that at least some of you didn’t want and something that helped to sink the district financially (although it would appear from Skeptic’s post above that they didn’t need the 7th period day to sink the district…they could have sank the ship fine on their own)

  28. Joanne

    But wait…KRN, I’m still confused. Did the teachers have to approve the 7th period day or not? Because if the teachers approved it ONLY on the condition that it was funded by a parcel tax..then it would not have happened because we don’t have a parcel tax. So it was either approved by the teachers or teacher approval wasn’t necessary. Right? Please clarify.

  29. Rich Grogan

    What role was the CTA in this mess? I can only imagine the CTA was in favor of the 7th period day, because it would mean more teachers paying into the CTA coffer, which they dearly love.

  30. KRN

    1. The 7 period day was advanced by the District and approved by the Board. The teachers DO NOT have a vote on the issue.

    2. The teachers at BHS approved a “pilot” seven period day BECAUSE we were told that it would be funded. If you read the thread, “Why didn’t they listen to their own advice” you would see that the parent, teacher, County Sup. Committee voted for a 7 period day ONLY upon a parcel tax.

    Rich,
    The teachers did not approve the 7 perod day even though it would increase the number of teachers. The teachers in the district knew it would break the bank (and it did) and therefore were opposed to it.

    The 7 period day is only part of the problem. The real problem lies in the fact that the Academic Core cannot be implemented w/o the 7 period day. The root of the problem was the approval of the Academic Core without a long-term financial impact study. By the way, the teachers were also against the Academic Core because the teachers could see the negative financial impact upon the district. The Academic Core also threatens to kill the arts and music w/o a 7 period day. All of these issues SHOULD have been discussed a long time ago.

  31. Joanne

    Oh boy, we’re back to square one. I’ve never understood the Academic Core. I think it simply means that all students must take six courses (history, english, science, math, foreign language and pe) during freshmen and sophomore years. How does this differ from before? If you disagree with the Academic Core, what classes cited do you think are unnecessary? Before this year, band and choir have always been zero perid — so they could still be taken; pe stops being a requirement in the junior year so art can be taken then, or during the senior year. So what’s the big deal about the Academic Core?

  32. KRN

    Its the domino effect. The academic core could not be implemented without a seven period day. These are the words of the district administraton, not my own. It is not a BHS issue as much as it is at other schools but the DO wants all schools on the same page. It has nothing to do with what I think, it is what the Administration mandated.The Academic Core mandated the 7 period day and the 7 period day helped to cause the budget crisis. I’ll see if I can get some data for you to link this together.

    By the way… The 7 period day (with the major loss of instructional time) would financially function if we passed a parcel tax.

  33. KRN

    Here is the article and the link. You will notice that there are six mandatory courses listed for the 9th and 10th grade and the arts, electives, and athletics are not listed. A period for remedial courses in the sophomore year is also left off.

    When the district attempted to implement the Core, it discovered that it would destroy all of its band, art, and elective programs and therefore realized that it needed a 7 period day to make it all fit.

    P.S. The teachers NEVER received the extensive training that is mentioned at the end of the article.

    http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?id=26891&eddate=01/08/2004

    January 8, 2008

    Curriculum gets overhaul
    Daily Journal Staff Report

    English, math and social studies classes may all get a bit tougher as soon as next year in the San Mateo Union High School District.
    For the past several years, the district has been undergoing a process of strategic planning. Now school officials are ready to lift the veil on a two-year program that would raise the standards for a spate of subjects, said Associate Superintendent Sam Johnson.

    The program, which would cover the ninth and tenth grades, will be unveiled at a board meeting Jan. 22.

    It’s not so much the number of years students must take these classes, but what is taught in classrooms that will be getting a makeover, Johnson said. After completing the two-year program, he said the idea is to have students ready for college or the workforce.

    When we talk about an academic core, what we’re looking at is content,? Johnson said. We want students performing at a level so they’ll be armed to make real choices.?

    Specifically, the two-year system will prepare students to pursue a path in higher education or jump directly into the workforce. These days, Johnson said the two paths require a similar type of preparation.

    The lines are blurred you need a lot of the same skills,? he said.

    Right now, Johnson said students can select a series of classes starting in the ninth grade that would preclude them from being prepared for those paths.

    Classes that will be tweaked include English, math, science, foreign languages, physical education and social studies.

    If approved by the board, a portion of the program would be implemented in the 2004-2005 academic year, and the major chunk of it would follow in the next year.

    To prepare for the transformation, Johnson said teachers will have to undergo extensive training

  34. KRN

    And one more thing… After the adoption of the Academic Core, the district then realized that it would have to change the school day to accomodate the new requirements. Each school principal was promised an extra 15 teaching sections if they could convince their faculty to implement the 7 period day. This incentive created a competitive environment among the principals to see who could deliver on the Sup’s wish. The district has been so focused on the Academic Core and its 7 period day that it has not been paying attention to the bottom line of the budget.

  35. Joanne

    Well, I really appreciate your efforts to educate me, KRN, but I still don’t get it. Most students (especially those that are also involved in the arts) were taking all of the required courses before and 7 periods weren’t necessary. The only year that 7 periods were necessary is last year (because both sports AND pe) were inside the school day. If sports and music were both outside the school day, six periods would work just fine. As I’ve said in a prior post, music is not an “extracurricular” activity — it is a class that satisfies the UC fine arts requirement — but if it has functioned fine before during zero period, I suspect it could do so again.

  36. KRN

    You are correct. The students at BHS did NOT need the requirement of the Academic Core. The DO mandated that ALL schools operate in the same manner. The “old” program worked just fine at BHS and there was no solid reason for changing it.

    ” If sports and music were both outside the school day, six periods would work just fine. As I’ve said in a prior post, music is not an “extracurricular” activity — it is a class that satisfies the UC fine arts requirement — but if it has functioned fine before during zero period, I suspect it could do so again.”–You are right!

    Here is the problem with the Core. If students cannot take art, music, elective, etc in their freshman or sophomore year, these programs will dry up and fold. It is very difficult to keep a teacher in any of these areas if they are only working on a part-time basis. Also, these subjects need to be developed over time. In order to have an Advanced Art class (UC approved) we also need to offer an introduction to art class. In order to have advanced drama, we also have to offer introduction to drama. We don’t send students directly into calculus for reason. They need preparation. While these courses may fit into the framework of the UC application in terms of slots on the application, they need to be developed over time.

    I will grant you this… the district has done a very poor job in educating the public on the “how and why” of the Academic Core and 7 period day and has failed at establishing a popular base behind these programs.

    The teachers cannot fight this battle alone. The Parents and Community need to begin to ask for responsible leadership from the DO. There will be some very discouraging things coming out of the schools in the next few weeks as the SMUHSD and the teachers begin to do battle over the budget.

  37. Anonymous

    Let’s just cut to the chase:

    Teachers want a parcel-tax so they get paid.

    Think of another way.

    Many bond measures and tax increases will go down to defeat this election due to the mismanagement of funds evidenced thus far.

  38. KRN

    Correction…

    Teachers want a parcel tax so that we can continue to get paid. At the current level of expenditures, there is not enough money to cover teachers salaries, hence the laying off of temporary teachers.

    As it stands right now, the district wants to cut teacher’s pay to cover their overspending on the 7 period day.

    I have no problem with the public rejecting a bond measure. The Board needs to make the proper cuts to bring the educational offerings of the schools in line with the budget.

  39. Joanne

    KRN, maybe part of the problem is that the SMUHSD is doing a “one size fits all” approach to the six different high schools. Maybe it’s time to realize that each school has different constituencies and different needs.

  40. KRN

    I have been saying those words for years! One size does not fit all and BHS is paying the price.

    No Child Left Behind = No Child Gets Ahead.

  41. Anonymous

    It is horrible to see AP english classes with 35 kids, and shortened time-frame to boot. No offense to other subject matter, but I think that english is the most important to learn for life: critical reading, thinking and writing. It isn’t taught as well in middle school anymore, either. By the time the kids get to High School, many still can’t write or get a point across in an organized manner. Whatever happened to sentence diagramming, etc.? It may be boring, but you never forget it, and I consider it a gift for life.

    With such large classes, it is amazing that a teacher could even make an impact. I realize that college english classes can be huge, but even the TA sessions are very, very small. If they don’t have small, intimate classes in high school, for many it will be a less than enjoyable experience and turn them off of reading and writing, for good.

  42. Rich Grogan

    KRN, you are a wealth of knowledge and I appreciate you input on this very important issue. With that said, I have a serious concern on one item you mentioned “By the way… The 7 period day (with the major loss of instructional time) would financially function if we passed a parcel tax.”

    As a tax payer I do not wish to pay more tax money into a system that will offer students a program (with the major loss of instructional time). I am sorry, I feel it is disingenous for the District to ask the tax payers for more money when the District has demonstrated their inability to manage and adaquately educated the students within the district.

    In an ideal, I would like to see ALL of the teachers within the District to stand up and speak out against what is taking place within the District, demand Sam Johnson to step down, abolish tenure, and demand the removal of substandard educators.

  43. Anonymous

    I agree with Rich.

    It is also disingenous for the teachers to hurt the children they are meant to help, by cutting noon and after-school help.

    Protesting the District’s faults, by doing the opposite of helping our children, is not the way to increase any future favor of the parents.

  44. KRN

    “It is also disingenous for the teachers to hurt the children they are meant to help, by cutting noon and after-school help.”

    Pete,
    what do you suggest that teachers do to get people like yourself off the couch and into the discussion? Are you willing to sponsor a club on your lunch hour or would you like to tutor after-school. We have an after school progrm where you can put in your time.

    Teachers are not contracted nor paid for the actions that you mention. So are you stating that teachers “owe” this to the public? Please remember that these children have parents who can help to solve this problem. The teachers did not start this problem, they are only responding to the problem.

    Rich,

    You have my comment correct. The 7 period day will financially function with a parcel tax and it will not without one.

    I’m not advocating that we pass a parcel tax. I’m making a clear statement that the SMUHSD cannot run a 7 period day without a parcel tax. The 7 period day is “beyond” the function of a normal school day. If the district wants to offer more school then it needs to obtain additional funds.

  45. Anonymous

    Oh- I’m off the couch now, pal.

    I already run a club for kids.
    I already help out a school during the lunch hour.
    I already tutor my child at home.

    You’re chewing on the hand that feeds you.

    The parents will come to your rescue with this mismanagement of school money- in the meantime stay above the fray and continue your professional calling to teach.

    Pete

  46. Skeptic

    The following is not an attack on teachers, but what I believe is factual information. I understand that the Union Contract has a formula whereby a certain percentage of the District’s revenues must be used for teacher’s salaries. I understand that the District last year paid the teachers this percentage based on “anticipated” revenue. Of course, with the tax rebates the revenue effectively came in less and the teachers got somewhere in the area of $ 1.5 to 1.8 million too much. The Union was asked, but apparently refused, to reduce teachers’ pay this year to, in effect, refund the overpayment. I understand the Union refused. The District apparently does not want to take legal action to get a refund, because they are afraid of a work slowdown or other action that would be detrimental to the kids (apparently a small dose of this is already happening). However the District got to this situation, it would be devestating to the kids to have to cut the $ 3.5 million out of the other 15% of the budget (around $ 13 mil. plus)if the teachers don’t chip in. To solve the present problem, it’s too late for a parcel tax.

  47. KRN

    Pete,

    Why is it that you get to tell me what to do in my job yet you get offended when I ask you a similar questions? If I continued to offer supervision, help, and student support on my own time, then the status quo would prevail and parents would feel no need to act. I didn’t mean to offend you, but in the end you won’t lose any money on this issue. I, on the other hand may lose part of my monthly mortgage.

    Rich,
    (1) The district negotiated a contract with the Teachers Association.
    (2) The district and the board negotiated and signed agreements for contract payments.
    (3) The teachers agreed to items in those contracts in exchange for salary.
    (4) These are legally binding contracts and the district cannot sue for a refund.
    (5) The teachers have already “re-paid” the district its salary increases by not receiving increases in subsequent years when the tax base did increase. The District and the Teachers are even. The teachers don’t want to take a salary cut for one simple reason. We negotiated an agreeement; the Superintendent and the Board signed the document. If the Sup and the Board negotiated salary increases that they could not pay for then they should be reprimanded. Would you really make this comment if this were a business contract? The only reason that the administration is going after the teacher’s salary is because it is the only money that the district can get back.

    The district has already spent $3 million on a 7 period day that it can’t afford. It can’t get that money back.

    The District has made the Teachers Association into a scapegoat. By focusing on the teachers salary, the public is not looking into the financial mismanagement of the administration. The School Board Minutes hold the truth. The County Sup told the district NOT to run a 7 period day because the district could not afford it. The district called her “unreliable.” Now she is putting the district in its place. Don’t buy into the scapegoat.

  48. Joanne

    Skeptic, you are a breath of fresh air. I hope you keep researching and keep posting. The question I have is did the contract actually specifiy that the teachers should get a percentage or is that merely what the SMUHSD was thinking about when it determined what it could afford to offer the teachers. If the former, then the teachers salaries would automatically be reduced, wouldn’t they? And, if it’s that latter (that the SMUHSD was thinking they could afford a 3% raise because of their budget projections, when it turns out they couldn’t) then isn’t that just another way of highlighting the ineptitude of the district’s financial office? I understand that budgeting is an art, not a science, but when one hit was already taken, and when, as you so ably pointed out Skeptic, the district had run a deficit each year for the past five years, ya would think that the SMUHSD might have been a little more conservative when it drew up this year’s budget.
    KRN, you’re angry and understandably so. Parents understand that lots, if not most, of the teachers do extra work beyond 8 -3 p.m. Most professionals do. So do all the parent-volunteers who donate their time and raise money to make your jobs easier. Insulting parents by asking them if they “volunteer” at school as much as you do or hurting the students (by withholding letters of recommendation) so that their parents will listen is an odd way to get people’s attention. And, it could backfire.

  49. jean

    I noticed a few things during my short time on campus today.

    The parent volunteers: they were not given notice of program closings (library) to “not show up” for their service. Probably not the best way to treat the folks you’re trying get money from.

    The notes on all the doors: It would have sufficed to place a note along the lines of “I am no longer available at the posted time, Please see me during class” or “This facility temporarily closed, please report to..” Rather than burdening already stressed out students with the posting outlining the conflict du jour. The students do not need to be a part of this, they didn’t cause it and can not fix it, and it’s no way to ensure compassion from the parents (same goes for recommendation letters)

    The students: It was expressed that teachers are talking about the issues during class time. Inappropriate and a poor use of shortened class time.

    The facility: Well, it is just beautiful.

  50. ASE

    Jean,
    As a very involved student at BHS who can qualify as one of the “stressed” out students that you mention, I don’t think it’t right for the teachers, administrators, or parents to hide anything from us. We’re not the weak helpless creatures you make us out to be. We don’t need to be sheltered. I thought I had heard a lot about the situation, until I was told about this forum, and I jumped at the opportunity to learn more about the problem our district is facing. I think it would be beneficial for students to be informed, although I disagree with the approach taken by some teachers of creating a mandatory class discussion on the topic. It’s not the teachers place to inform the student body, lest someone get in trouble for giving a biased account, but who says that the students shouldn’t know what’s going on, and know that their own education is being put in danger. Why do we teach history in schools if not to teach children to learn from mistakes made in the past. If this can be prevented in any school district in the future by informing the student body of the mistakes made bt the SMUHSD, then by all means, spread the word.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026