Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Todays Burlingame News states the following:

(1) "The city doesn't have a plan in place to put a measure on the ballot" but Gags say he would "absolutely support" a non-binding advisory initiative
(2) As Rich Grogan so rightly points out, a ballot measure is one way to try to circumvent the normal planning and approval process.
(3) Gags says "an overwhelming" number of people say they are 'shocked' that the project didn't pass and "a vocal minority managed to kill the project". Oh God, not that again!
(4) Importantly, Gags says "the Safeway's plan wasn't perfect. There were some issues that needed to be resolved and they could have been worked out". Ditto! Ditto! Ditto!
(5) Hudak said the telephone survey was being done to guide the company's internal process and depending on the results, that could mean the company returns with another plan. Exactly – come back with another plan. These words have been spoken by the illustrious and the not-so-illustrious. The Planning Commission, the City Council, the vocal minority, the vocal majority and even Councilmember Coffey – who will forget his "Is that Clear"!

Questions and suggestions for Gags, since he has blocked my emails but I know he reads this blog:

(1) Please give us copies of all those overwhelming emails/letters of our "shocked" citizenry – including the ones that come from San Mateo and Hillsborough.
(2) You are giving the "vocal minority" way too much power. I know it is a compliment to their hard work and citizenship but you know that this statement is disingenuous.
(3) As you so rightly say, the plan "wasn't perfect" so instead of pushing an "advisory measure", why don't YOU remind Safeway why their plan was NOT perfect and then remind them again and again and again?!

It is not rocket science, folks!

– Written by Fiona

Posted in

2 responses to “Advisory Measure”

  1. rich grogan

    Well folk, it is official, as a resident of Burlingame, I have served the city with my official request pursuant to the California Public Records Act requesting certain documents relating to Safeway. My request should contain ALL of those emails Galligan referred to, but was unwilling to make available for public review. When Galligan brought up those “invisible” emails, he was asked how many were there and his answer was anything but specific. He just did not want to provide the specific number, I wonder why. It will be most interesting to see just how many of those emails are from out of Burlingame as well as what were the email writers saying in their emails. It should get very interesting, once the documents are made available for public review.

    What is really sad is the fact that it didn’t have to be this way or get to this point. If there are emails, all Galligan had to do was make them public. As the result of Galligan’s apparent obstinacy, he has forced the issue to be raised to a higher level.

    It is beyond me why Galligan continues to refer to those in opposition to the Behemoth Safeway as a vocal minority who managed to kill the project. Council Member Galligan, might I remind you that the Planning Commission Meeting had to be moved to the High School gymnasium. The Planning Commissioners were very articulate in their reasons for not granting the permit for the Behemoth structure. What about all of those BURLINGAME RESIDENTS, not union shills, who spoke in front of the Planning Commission and expressed their opposition to the Behemoth structure.

    This whole issue makes me wonder, what is in it for you?

  2. I need to let you all know that I was shopping in SAFEWAY two weeks ago and just happened to be in the right place at the right time.

    I was in the Vegi Section and all of a sudden the double back doors swung open and 6-7 men dressed in suit pants and white shirts emerged from the rear room. I just knew they were discussing the PLANS TO BUILD A NEWER AND BIGGER SAFEWAY!! So I became very vocal on the spot and belted out: WE DON’T WANT YOUR BIG STORE PLAN!!! WE JUST DON’T WANT IT!!!

    5-6 of the men just continued to walk past me but one of the men stayed. He was one of the Chief Financial Officers for Safeway and he asked me: WHAT DO YOU WANT? and I went on to explain the years of working on this project and going door to door to talk w/people in Burlingame and the plans that we have submitted in the past.

    I mentioned a California style – w/tile roof, a smaller building leaving the heritage trees on the property, having the open area look out on to Primrose and face Chicken Chicken, to make it smaller and more inviting to our downtown area. I asked him to consider the aesthetics as well as the functionality!!! WE DON’T NEED THE MEGA-BOX!!!

    anyway for what it is worth. . . I remember when I got wind of this in 1997 and wouldn’t let it go. . . finally, after I said we didn’t have the money to do this justice, the CFO replied that we have put up one darn good fight so far!!!

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading