A comment on the Year in Crime: 2021 post reminded me to double back to the question of whether or not we put in license plate reading cameras in B'game. According to the DJ article, in a rare split decision, councilors Ortiz, O'Brian and Colson went for the idea while Brownrigg and Beach were opposed.
Burlingame is one of just four cities in the county that has yet to approve the cameras (Ed: that means 16 already have them), according to Police Chief Mike Matteucci, who added he believed they would be beneficial in the city. Others on the Peninsula have turned to the cameras in hopes of stopping auto burglaries near hotels or retail crime.
Matteucci said implementation in Burlingame would likely consist of two-dozen or more cameras installed at entry and exit points to the city and major intersections. They could also be affixed to police vehicles.
You will recall from the Year in Crime: 2021 post that vehicle burglaries were up 25% year over year to 25 per month–basically everyday someone gets burgled. And that number may or may not include the catalytic converter thefts–I've asked BPD for some numbers on that really expensive crime (~$2,800 to replace, keep your insurance current). At least one reluctant councilmember wants to "see the data". I would suggest that all council members should be reviewing the data regularly. Heck, I would make it a regular council agenda item, but that's just me.
Brownrigg, however, said he was unconvinced Burlingame had a need for the cameras and expressed reluctance to increase surveillance or traffic stop frequency in the city.


Leave a Reply