Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

The LA Times remains on the case regarding the high-cost boondoggle that continues to trudge along in the Central Valley.  In a piece titled Newsom and California lawmakers hit an impasse on financing bullet train the Times notes

A battle to secure an additional $4.2 billion for the California bullet train has hit an impasse, with Gov. Gavin Newsom and legislative leaders failing to reach a compromise Friday.

Unless the two sides resume talks soon, any additional money for the bullet train will have to be negotiated in 2022, forcing the rail project to dip further into the roughly $2-billion pot it has in hand….a large coalition in the Assembly wants some of the money diverted to high-speed rail segments in Southern California and the Bay Area.

The negotiations were led by Assembly Transportation Chair Laura Friedman (D-Glendale), who has been pressing the bullet train project to improve its performance after a history of cost increases and schedule delays. Friedman has contended for months that there was no reason to give the rail authority the full $4.2-billion appropriation when it wasn’t needed in immediate years.

The legislative dispute could affect the willingness of Congress to provide federal funding for the bullet train out of a $3.5-trillion budget resolution.

One can only hope.  We are at Recall minus nine days.  I believe virtually anyone who would win on Question 2 would immediately put a bullet in the bullet train, including MeetKevin.  I know I would as I noted here.  It would be Day 1.

Posted in ,

8 responses to “High-Cost Rail- Part 155 CA Legislature Balks at Cost”

  1. Everything was Jake

    Gavin is beholden to unions (all of them) so he needs to keep this boondoggle rolling. Never mind we don’t have enough drinkable water, reliable energy, or safe streets. We do have fleeing companies, one less house seat, illegal immigrant influx, rampant fires, and highest taxes. Gavin wants his pyramid. Worst governor EVER.

  2. Dear Jake,
    Could you please share your conclusion that “Unions” have anything to do with:
    Drinkable Water
    Reliable Energy
    Safe Streets
    Fleeing Companies
    One less House Seat
    Illegal Immigrant Influx
    Rampant Fires
    Highest Taxes
    Dear Jake, what do “Unions” have to do with your believes?
    I’ll Wait.

  3. Hollybuffoon

    C’mon man. The unions bribe or threaten the liberal politicians who use the ill gotten gains to get reelected and jam up the works. Pluck the goose. Where you been, son?

  4. This is just what I expected.
    You do not have any ability to respond due to your personal “feelings.”
    No facts at all. You are a Bigot…

  5. Joe

    holly, you can go here for some facts: https://www.sfchronicle.com/projects/2021/newsom-california-recall-donors/
    I count 17 union donations of $500K or more which is where I stopped counting.

  6. I am very aware that there are “all kinds” of PAC’s involved in Politics. Unfortunately.
    I do not have the energy to post the thousands of Corporations that “straight up” HAVE to SUPPORT Politicians. Or loose business.
    I did not read the article you suggested. I will.
    Have a Great Evening all. Happy Yom Kippur!

  7. Joe

    Sigh. The boondoggle continues pouring good money after bad. In this week’s non-news news:
    The California High-Speed Rail Authority (Authority) Board of Directors today certified the Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement (EIR/EIS) and unanimously approved the approximately 90-mile San Jose to Merced project section in Northern California. This action completes the environmental clearance for nearly 400 miles of the high-speed rail project’s 500-mile Phase 1 alignment from San Francisco to Los Angeles/Anaheim – including a contiguous stretch between Merced and Palmdale plus January’s clearance of the Burbank to Los Angeles section.
    The Board’s actions mark their first certification of a project section environmental document in the Northern California region and the first in the San Francisco Bay Area.
    The Board’s certification of the San Jose to Merced Final EIR/EIS and approval of the project section is a critical milestone that moves the project section closer to being “shovel ready” for when pre-construction and construction funding becomes available.
    The Authority Board of Directors selected Alternative 4 as the approved project alignment among the four alignment alternatives studied. This alternative modernizes and electrifies the existing rail corridor between San Jose and Gilroy, allowing for both high-speed rail and Caltrain service.
    “Next to San Jose, Gilroy will be the next most significant transit hub on this stretch,” said Gilroy Mayor Marie Blankley. “Gilroy Transit Center is very much ready for this to happen.”
    East of Gilroy, the alignment includes more than 15 miles of tunnels through the Pacheco Pass in the Diablo Range. The Board will consider certification for the final environmental document for the San Francisco to San Jose project section this summer.
    ——————————-
    Only 15 miles of tunneling. That’s gonna be a lot of “shovel-ready money”, my friends.

  8. DemocRATS just can’t say no to the labor unions.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading