Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Voice readers have had plenty of background on the issues surrounding staff misconduct since two prior Voice threads have followed this issue closely here and before that here.  Actual letters went out on Monday reinforcing the earlier decision to suspend as reported in the Daily Journal today 

The teaching credentials of three San Mateo Union High School District administrators are still in limbo after the governing board responsible for determining the fate of their case declined to reconsider its decision to suspend the officials. 

Dr. Kevin Skelly, district superintendent; Dr. Kirk Black, deputy superintendent of Human Resources and Student Services; and Pamela Duszynski, Mills High School principal; face suspensions of their education credentials due to mismanagement claims brought by a Mills High School teacher.  The Committee on Credentials, the investigative arm of the state’s Commission on Teacher Credentialing, recommended suspensions of 120 days for Duszynski, 30 days for Skelly and 14 days for Black.

The officials lobbied the governing body to reconsider the recommendations but were sent letters Monday informing them the COC’s decisions would be upheld. Formal suspensions have not been approved at this point, leaving each administrator still credentialed.  

Robert Griffin, president of the San Mateo Union High School District Board of Trustees, reacted to the news in an email statement, sharing disappointment the committee’s chose not to reconsider “its initial erroneous decision.”  The officials still have the opportunity to appeal the suspensions which will be decided through the Attorney General’s Office.

Click through on the DJ link above to read the rest of the story and if you feel like reading up on the disciplinary process from the Commission on Teacher Credentialing it can be found here.  I don't have any special insight on this, but I do wonder if an appeal to the Attorney General might not be the trigger that takes this from an investigation of one series of incidents at Mills to a broader review of SMUSHD events there and elsewhere?  In my experience, which is quite substantial, there is always a "be careful what you ask for" component to personnel issues.

Posted in

126 responses to “SMUSHD: Suspensions to Proceed, Appeals Likely”

  1. WWVD-What Would Vic Do?- Vetting Needed

    The demise of local journalism gives rise to unscrupulous acts and a dereliction of duty by elected officials and public employees. There is no fear of accountability or public shaming if there are no local journalists vetting the stories.
    The story should be an analysis of the demise of what was a great institution and another casualty added to the heap, rather than an upcoming “retirement” celebration.
    Re-arranging the deck chairs will not stop the ship from sinking, as it needs a complete overhaul.
    The taking of an early victory lap by elected officials before the job is done only leads to more problems.
    We can only hope that Mr. Booker has been thoroughly and properly informed, rediscovers the roots of his Burlingame childhood, and brings the tools to remove the infections that have plagued the system.

  2. Mom of 2

    Let’s hope Mr.Booker brings in his own team to clean up this mess. The Board still needs to answer for their role in this debacle. They didn’t listen to the public and they never made a statement.

  3. What Vic Would Do-A blueprint for action-

    There is a reason that the street in front of BHS is Vic Mangini Way. It’s time to reflect on the first 100 years of BHS and get the (district) campus back on track.
    How about rather than just wishing that Mr. Booker brings in his own team, we provide him with a blueprint of what needs to be done.
    Instead of the district continuing to hemorrhage tax payers money funding Black and Skelly’s legal bills in two separate cases, the Board could facilitate a fully external team to evaluate the current “situation” and provide Superintendent Booker a complete outline of the issues and a game plan to “Hit the Ground Running.”
    The information and data collected by the Leadership Associates Superintendent Search Firm is already in possession and most likely paints a clear picture of the issues that need to be address. (We know that both Skelly and the Board will not articulate the REAL problems because then they would have to take responsibility) Confidential interviews with site principals, teacher leadership, and parent groups create Day 1 Game Plan for Superintendent Booker. Any board of directors for a publicly held corporation would approve such an action and expense because of the time and money it would save in the long run. There are employees who have an incentive to distract the new leader from their past to perpetuate their own futures. A confidential plan would also let the Board and Mr. Booker know who to release ASAP rather than offering an additional year’s contract on July 1 as is the practice. The exiting regime gives an additional year of employment to those they know are deficient, further delaying the transition to improvement and sanity.
    The Board does need to make a public statement. The board has continually ignored public knowledge and input, granting Skelly a two-year contract extension over the stated concerns of local and state officials. The Board gave Skelly a blind “vote of confidence” only to be betrayed.
    The new By-District election places Trustee Land in the position of communicating the constituents of Burlingame regarding his actions in these issues. Trustee Land is now the only Trustee responsible to Burlingame so the responsibility to come forth on these issues and those of Burlingame High School and Mills High School rest on Mr. Lands shoulders.
    This same Board believed that Superintendent Skelly was the delivered savior who would move the SMUHSD forward. Skelly articulated that his experience would prevail, yet he too became the mouthpiece of the manipulators, ignoring the facts and leaving Burlingame far worse than when he found it.
    Burlingame High School will celebrate its centennial anniversary next year, but who is left to pass on and tell its history?
    If Skelly had been presented with a blueprint outlining the issues and concerns of the SMUHSD, he never would have trusted those who abused him nor would he have so eloquently defended Principal Yim’s story of the “Dick in the Box.”
    This is a homecoming for Superintendent Booker and a real opportunity in the post COVID environment to push the SMUHSD to a place of honor and success rather than “just another wealthy school district.”
    Spend the money, collect the information, produce a report. Give Mr. Booker what he really needs to make change.
    If Superintendent Booker is saddled with leftover deadweight administrators advanced one year contracts by his predecessor, it’s going to be another expensive and wasted period of time.

  4. Jiminy Cricket- Yim-Gate was a hoax-the truth hurts, but it also heals

    Jiminy Cricket tried to keep Pinocchio on the straight and narrow.
    The SMUHSD can use a Jiminy Cricket right about now.
    Yim-Gate- was a hoax- and the Board fell for it.
    The lengthy posts linked below tell the story that no one wants “out.”
    The Board was “taken for a ride” and Superintendent Skelly is now “retiring.”
    Need Proof? Go to the (9:45) mark of the Board Meeting linked below. (1,379 views!)
    Watch a “former” teacher disclose to the Board how she was harassed and threatened in her classroom and ignored by the administration. (she made this appearance because she and her claims were dismissed)
    “At 8 months pregnant, I came to Skelly’s Office crying and begging for protection, he told me to get another job.”



    This administration has been withholding critical information from the Board for years- starting with Principal Di Yim and BHS.
    Yim-Gate was a deflection from the real issues which is now known to be an “inside job.”
    Now that the depth of the lies has been “discovered,” the Board is confused and embarrassed, yet responsible to fix the extensive damage.
    The board would like everyone to look forward to Superintendent Booker (A Burlingame Choice) as the savior in 2022 and ignore the past and the damage. Not so fast….
    Superintendent Booker cannot clean up the mess if he is chained down by being forced to “carry” the same district office “leaders” who created the mess.
    The contracts of these individuals must be made public and approved by July 1, 2022. The public is waiting.
    Booker needs a clean house and an opportunity to rebuild. -BHS specifically-
    The Grand Jury or a state auditor should step in to do what no elected official has the integrity to do– tell the people the truth.
    The last time the Grand Jury came to town it was because BHS had a second swastika incident (because one swastika incident is not enough) and the now outgoing district office stated that swastikas did not reflect the “dominant school culture.”
    How many swastika incidents are needed before it is defined as problematic issue in a high school culture?
    BHS is headed into its centennial celebration with set of leaders who don’t know or understand the community or the school.
    Principal Yim hated Burlingame High School and its community. She wanted to destroy its traditions and culture, and eradicate its history. (statement of a current BHS teacher)
    Ironically, Yim’s “shaking her money-maker” to the “Dick in the Box” with the senior boys of the water polo team ended her time at BHS, but the damage was done. Superintendent Skelly was manipulated and issued a public apology to Di YIm as HE believed that she had been “wronged.” (because Skelly was manipulated by his own people)
    After resigning from BHS, Yim ran off to Las Vegas in a post marital affair with another SMUHSD district office leader.
    Can the city and campus rally to the cause?
    BHS has always come back.
    The failed attempt by the district to close the school in 1982 comes to mind. BHS was reborn and became the “go-to” school as students from around the district begged for a transfer to the BHS campus.
    The new by-district elections places Trustee Land into a single member district and he alone has the responsibility to represent and communicate the facts to the BHS community.
    The public wants and needs the truth- It’s the Board’s job to deliver the truth.
    “Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong” and it did.
    Now it’s time to reverse course and clean up the mess.
    Superintendent Booker will need the “Best and the Brightest” to support him as he will soon uncover the disgusting mess that caused considerable damage.
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2019/04/part-4-bhs-politics-in-the-classroom
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2018/01/parents-uniting-for-nelson-part-3
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2015/02/bhs-no-6
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2016/02/bhs-teacher-conflict

  5. Just How Bad is it-The Board’s Body Language tells the tale

    At the SMUHSD District Office, employees have literally walked out the door, quitting their jobs in frustration. The environment is bad enough that individuals just don’t care. The morale of the staff with “boots on the ground” has plummeted, yet the leadership keeps playing the fiddle.
    The Board needs to send a clear and physical message to its employees and constituents that it is taking the transition seriously and will empower the NEW Superintendent with the tools and budget needed to rebuild the district and its schools.
    The current message of “business as usual” is not comforting or plausible. The iceberg is clearly in front of the Titanic, yet the Board seems to believe that the ship can take the impact.
    Allowing the outgoing administration to continue to implement its ideology, will spiral the damaging momentum forward, pushing actual recover that much farther down the road.
    Let them go now.
    The level of frustration of site administrators’ who have not left, is visually apparent and worrisome. The district will replace almost 1/3 of school site leaders. Those who remain will be left to pick up the pieces. These individual needs to know where they are going and who is going to direct them.
    This damage isn’t from COVID, it’s the product of a complete lack authentic of leadership. A lack of ethics or leading by example. Parents, community members, and employees have publicly called out the leadership for making appealing comments in front of the Board and then changing their tone and comments when the doors are closed.
    If the Board fails to perform the necessary surgery, it’s going to be attending its own autopsy.
    This isn’t a financial debacle which is visible on a balance sheet, it’s the death of the esprit de corps that is essential for public organizations to flourish.
    The hypocrisy has reached a comical level where mistreated or lies by central leadership are expected.
    The Board recently had its own “come to Jesus” moment when THEY discovered that the administration had been misleading them and withholding information that was essential for making governing decisions.
    The Board did not even know that the administration’s credentials were being suspended until the members read about it in the SM Daily Journal.
    The video link below offers some damaging content – the Board is very candid and forgets they are on Zoom.
    The Board’s body language is enough to see how bad things are-
    Got To (1:56:00) at the link below-“Tell us EVERYTHING and TELL US FIRST”
    (1:56:40) -What Trustees Land and Lees Dywer-they are vigorously “nodding” in agreement about Skelly’s lies and then they “break up laughing” at finding out about the lies “in the newspaper.”
    https://youtu.be/wZhD9JG-iko
    The SMUHSD has only six comprehensive schools, yet it is losing eight (8) of its administrative leaders. That is almost 1/3 of the site level leadership. The administrative compensation in the SMUHSD is exceptionally high. These people just got fed up and got out.
    The 2021-2022 School Year in the San Mateo Union High School District
    1. SMUHSD Superintendent Kevin Skelly “retires” after CTC Scandals
    2. Capuchino High School Principal- steps down-back to teaching
    3. Burlingame High School Assistant Principal- steps down- back to teaching
    4. Burlingame High School Principal – “Leave of Absence”
    5. Aragon High School Assistant Principal- resigns-moving
    6. Aragon High School Assistant Principal-resigns-moving
    7. San Mateo- High School Assistant Principal-left
    8. Mills High School Assistant Principal- “resigned”
    Under Investigation by the CTC Education Misconduct Committee
    • Superintendent Kevin Skelly-Credential Suspension-Appeal to the Deputy Attorney General of California
    • Deputy Superintendent of Human Resources Kirk Black- Credential Suspension-Appeal to the Deputy Attorney General of California
    • Mills High School Principal – Credential Suspension-Appeal to the Deputy Attorney General of California
    2020-2021
    • Deputy Superintendent -Chief Budget Officer Liz McManus- forced out. (December 2020)

  6. Listen-Threats, Lies, and Audio Tapes- Yim-Gate- Alex Butterfield

    Listen to the evidence-
    Evidence in hand shows Yim-GATE was based on fraudulent actions and the Trustees have refused to take action.
    The Grand Jury needs to investigate-
    Listen to the audio-
    Glenn Mendelson hit the nail on the head in his remarks to the Board in March 2016
    While many parent supporters spoke at the meeting, the insight of Mendelson on an “alliance of a few teachers with Yim to push out Nelson was right on target.
    Go to the (2:49:10) mark on the audio
    “There are a group of teachers, some with questionable student related issues of their own have been hiding behind Principal Yim after they were exposed for their wrongdoing.”
    “THEY are the ones pressuring Skelly and the Board for the transfer.”
    “This group of teachers appear to have BHS and the district in a choke hold.”
    “they are pushing for Nelson’s transfer to get even.”
    “An alliance has been created to ensure Nelson is transferred.”
    https://soundcloud.com/kevin-nelson-58744597/board-meeting-3-24-16?utm_source=clipboard&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=social_sharing
    In his address to the Board, Superintendent Skelly THEN stated, (3:23:45)
    “I reject teacher conspiracy on this issue.” (Then why bother to mention it)
    This statement to the Board is right after Skelly offers an apology to Principal Yim from the District for her “Dick in the Box” performance. (where she had already “plead guilty”to the prior superintendent)
    (3:00)
    https://youtu.be/GIY-khE95LQ?t=187
    Confirming the Conspiracy-
    In February 2019, Superintendent Skelly CONFIRMED the teacher conspiracy alleged by Mendelson.
    Skelly KNEW in March 2016 when he made the statement to the Board “I reject teacher conspiracy” that it was exactly what had taken place.
    In February 2019, Skelly stated that AFTER Principal Yim resigned and before Nelson’s Involuntary Transfer, two BHS Teachers arranged “secret meetings” with him, where they persuaded him to make carry out the Nelson’s transfer.
    Skelly refused to name the teachers or investigate their statements.
    The teachers involved in the “secret meetings” were identified by their peers.
    Yim-Gate was a fraud, and its damage continued to destroy BHS.
    Skelly paraded around the Board acting as if he knew everything when actually knew nothing at all. His words to the Board and the public were void of facts.
    (3:19:00) audio link
    The Board is currently holding a Skelly-Fest, celebrating his departure while continuing to suppress the evidence and damage.
    The Board’s ignorance of these issues and refusal to take action only escalated the juvenile antics and behaviors of this small group of teachers at BHS. The problem in this case, was that the action were against students and parents THEY did not like.
    Skelly is gone on July 1, 2022, but the other culprits remain.
    There are community members who are aware of these issues as well and have pressed the Board to take action.
    Crickets-
    The Trustees are well aware of the abundance of facts, links, evidence, audio and video that are damning, but have allow the leadership to take no action to protect the community, its students or its tax dollars.
    Why no action?
    Because up to December 2021- They believed Skelly, until they were informed that he wasn’t telling the truth. The Board called it a “communications” issue.
    Got To (1:56:00) “Tell us EVERYTHING and TELL US FIRST”
    (1:56:40) Trustees Land and Lees Dwyer-are vigorously “nodding” in agreement about Skelly’s lies and then they “break up laughing” as they recall finding out about the lies in the SM Daily Journal.
    Threats, lies, and Audio Tapes
    https://youtu.be/wZhD9JG-iko
    What a mess for Superintendent Booker to clean up. Has anyone even warned him about Brutus and The Ides of March?

  7. Pulling a Fast One?-They think the public isn’t looking

    While Superintendent Skelly is leaving, it looks as though the Board is attempting to intentionally ignore the rest of the necessary housecleaning, “pulling a fast one” as they believe the public is not paying attention.
    An observant lawyer reviewing the situation summed it up with the following-
    the Board is “Too Chummy” with its administrators and that only leads to deceit.
    During the last SMUHSD scandal, Superintendent Sam Johnson withheld from the Board the fact that he put the district $3.5 million in debt and the construction costs were $73 million above cost. Then Board President Marcia Cohn-Lyle responded that the Board and Johnson were a Team of Six? and would fix the problem together. Johnson was thrown out and so was the Board (who are also the current members getting scammed)
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2007/04/smuhsd-the-multi-million-dollar-mistake
    The SMUHSD is a Shakespearian Tragedy and the outcome of what may be these final acts are no different.
    “Something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”
    (its been rotting for a while)
    Let me see. (Hamlet takes the Skelly)
    Alas, poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio, a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy. He hath borne me on his back a thousand times, and now, how abhorred in my imagination it is!
    (Skelly lives in the “good old days” (some say good old boys) and fails to engage what needs to be fixed)
    “Nay, then, let the devil wear black, for I’ll have a suit of sables.”
    (The Devil)
    “This above all: to thine own self be true,
    And it must follow, as the night the day,
    Thou canst not then be false to any man”
    (No Ethics-No Honor)
    “The lady doth protest too much, methinks” (and far too often!)
    “Whatever can go wrong, will go wrong.”
    (Not Shakespeare, but the culprit nonetheless)
    As the tragedy closes, Things end poorly for everyone, including the “good guys.”
    BHS and the Burlingame Community are paying the price, victims of the Folly of Fools who will walk away laughing.
    Yim-Gate (and its associated scandals) was a fraud. This one may not cost the district $3.5 million, but it might come close.
    There is a Board Election in November while the Burlingame seat is not on the docket, these issues should still be ripe.
    The Deputy Attorney General may still have the last laugh.
    Superintendent Booker either deservers a better start or a bigger dust pan.

  8. HMB

    And Sam Johnson got his name on the Performing Arts Center at Cap — I shake my head every time I drive by.

  9. Report us?- We’ll get you-

    “You’ve got a nice kid there. It’d be a shame if anything were to… happen to your daughter.”
    File a complaint, we’ll get you-
    While Superintendent Skelly exits the building on June 30, there is still a significant amount of S*#T to cleaned up and thrown out.
    The Board continues its role as a dysfunctional enabler, allowing the administration to strong arm employees who report improper, unethical and illegal behavior.
    The district office is retaliation central.
    -On File with the SM Superior Court-
    In or about October 2017, a District human resources staffer, Lulu Davidson, called Petersen and spoke to her on the phone for over 40 minutes.
    Davidson claimed she was trying to “protect” Petersen and informed her that the District did not like it when employees made reports like the written report Petersen made about the assault.
    Petersen told Davidson she would not withdraw the report and Davidson WARNED Petersen to be “careful,” and mentioned that she knew Petersen was a single mother, saying “you have to think about keeping your job and raising your daughter,” or words to that effect.
    (legal brief-SM Superior Court)
    “…she knew Petersen was a single mother…”
    It would be a shame if something happened to you or your daughter…
    Read above-It’s coming up on a year and these actions are still viable.
    It would be interesting to know what others actions have take place over the past year?
    Superintendent Skelly- signed a two-year ($329k per) contract extension in August 2021-
    Five months later in January 2022-
    after stating that he loves his job and doesn’t plan to leave, Skelly “resigns-retires” leaving $658,000 in pay as he parachutes out the golden door.
    The Board knows something and they don’t want the public to find out. Collusion is never a good color on anyone.
    There is much more to be concerned about than just this one case….
    “You’ve got a nice kid there. It’d be a shame if anything were to… happen to your daughter.”

  10. $40 million price cut Crestmoor High School

    SMUHSD- More BS
    A $40 million price reduction?
    Which deal was bogus, the first or the last?
    How does the Board explain a $40 million price cut?
    SummerHill Homes, will purchase the former Crestmoor High School in December set the price at $85 million.
    The SMUHSD board trustees approved an amendment to that agreement that reduced to purchase price to $84.3 million
    An earlier deal with a different developer estimated a selling price of up to $125 million, but that deal fell through last August.
    Last August-Right after Skelly got a two year extension on his contract?
    Why take $85m ($84.3) when the selling price was $125m?
    Who is the master deal-maker?
    Its only the public’s money that is being abused…
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/san-mateo-union-high-school-district-s-crestmoor-deal-clears-hurdle/article_bc042bbe-f69d-11ec-ac80-3bc7f47f0071

  11. Skelly-Gate- It was an inside job

    Orange is the New Black-
    Yim-Gate has now become Skelly-Gate as the SMUHSD continues its attempts to cover up its negligence.
    In August 2021, Skelly inked a two-year contract extension at $329,000 per year. On January 12, 2022, he announced his “retirement.”
    Yim-Gate was foolish and an inside job. The players did not think they would get caught by holding “secret meetings” to pass lies.
    These were very big lies that Skelly kept “under wraps” but with his departure, there is not one to continue the cover up and Superintendent Booker “is sure to find out.”
    Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice, shame on you.
    So what did happened between the time Skelly signed his $658,000 contract extension in August 2021 and when he resigned on January 2022?
    According to Board member statements made ON ZOOM, Skelly’s early departure was related to “extreme communication and disclosure issues.” The Board FIRST found out about Superintendent Skelly, Deputy Superintendent Black, and the Mills Principal’s credential suspension form the SM Daily Journal.
    It’s time for the SM Daily Journal to jump in and investigate these items again.
    To make matters worse, the Board then parroted the talking points of the trio’s legal team, making the Board look even more foolish.
    The Board gave Skelly the contract extension AFTER they discovered the credential suspension had been hidden from them. The SM Daily Journal called it a, “vote of confidence.”
    Common sense (and $658,000) would dictate that this should be enough motivation to stay on straight and narrow, but no such luck.
    Over the next few months, the district office leadership and related others continued to engage in acts of extreme negligence which now may have both civil and criminal ramifications. The plan was set so that the leadership would not get caught. The leadership did not plan on the actions of a “loose cannon,” and the fact that the things that could go wrong, did go wrong.
    While Skelly took his golden parachute and bailed out, the trail of garbage left behind has already begun to rot. The Board has ignored the cue’s that they have SERIOS issues to remedy and they too may be individually implicated in all this mess.
    The actions from (and protected by) the SMUHSD include threats of violence, threats of termination of Whistleblowers, and false reports which could lead to police arrest SHOULD be enough for the Board or District Attorney to take action.
    Like the BHS Swastika incidents, (because it was ignored and covered up) this is going to take an external investigation (Grand Jury or private legal firm) because the folks who are supposed to be honest and ethical just won’t do the job. When the SMUHSD leadership (and by definition… THE BOARD) is covering up violations of both civil and criminal law.

  12. Follow the $$$$- Blocked Public Record Requests

    Why is the SMUHSD blocking a legal Public Record request for financial disclosures on the Skelly-Black administration?
    One year ago, in August 2021, the SMUHSD Board granted Superintendent Skelly a two-year extension on his contract at $329k per year DESPITE the fact the Superintendent’s credential was scheduled to be suspended. Skelly TOLD the Board that “all is well,” but it wasn’t. That was a lie in a much longer list of misleading statements and withholding information from the Board.
    After getting caught in a “fib” the Superintendent announced his “retirement” in January 2022 only months after landing the lucrative extension on his employment which HE stated “I love the work and I’m not leaving.”
    The Willful Negligence of Withholding Information
    The Skelly administration placed a”Firewall” around information and facts that should have flowed to the Board. The administrators blocked anything that could place themselves or their jobs in jeopardy.
    Ironically, the Lozano Smith Law firm that is supposed to represent the SMUHSD also represents the individual administrators in their wrongdoings. The Lozano firm is also the one who is blocking the Public Record Requests.
    So the Lozano Firm continues to collect $$$$ while playing both sides of the field, refusing to inform the Board of the negligence of its administrators. Lozano lawyers represented Skelly and Black in front of the CTC Educator Misconduct Committee-twice. This was NEVER communicated to the Board prior to the first hearing.
    How can Lozano represent the interests of the SMUHSD and NOT communicate these SERIOUS infractions to the Board?
    Prior to becoming “informed,” the Board got up on a soapbox and defended Skelly and Black believing the “tales” they had been told.
    How did the Board eventually find out about Skelly and Black getting their credential suspended?
    The Board read about it in the SM Daily Journal, just like everyone else.
    How much has this already cost the district and how much more is it going to cost?

  13. HMB

    Am I not reading the CTC search for Skelly and Black properly? I’m not seeing their records flagged/nothing under Adverse and Commission Actions. Is this because the matters are under appeal?
    What a shady business! It will be interesting to see if the board has learned anything from this debacle.

  14. Mom

    Regarding the recent stabbing incident at San Mateo High School: I’d be interested to know if the students involved had any prior history or reports for violence and threats in their student records? The news reported there were knives and a gun on the campus.
    This makes me think of the pregnant teacher who spoke at the board meeting last year, begging the Superintendent to remove violent students from her class. What are we waiting for? Are my kids going to be the next victims? The Administration needs to do a better job of protecting our students.

  15. Sad situation, things continue to devolve in the SMUHSD.

  16. (video) Sup. Skelly misled Trustees over seven Closed Session meetings

    Superintendent Skelly “misled” the SMUHSD Board of Trustees over a period of at least five months to include SEVEN Closed Sessions for the following.
    The Trustees were either asleep or in collusion.
    Superintendent Skelly was given a lucrative two year contract extension on August 12, 2021 and then announced his “retirement” on January 12, 2022, completing ONLY his current contract.
    Superintendent Skelly left $658,000 in compensation on the table after stating from August to December that he “loves his job and isn’t going anywhere.”
    It is reported that the lies to the Board fell apart in November-December 2021 which resulted in Skelly’s “option” to retire.
    In March 2022 (see below) the Trustees are on a hot mic and Zoom recording…
    Trustee Peter Hanley states (reflecting on Skelly)
    “Tell us EVERYTHING and TELL US FIRST”
    (the Trustees)
    Trustees Land and Lees Dwyer (on video)-are vigorously “nodding” in agreement about Skelly’s lies and then “break up laughing” at finding out about the lies “in the newspaper.”
    The Trustees have a legal obligation to ensure the public trust and manage the public’s funds. Laughing at Skelly getting caught is not the proper response to this scandal.
    The Trustees had a legal obligation to the public to conduct an investigation of these actions.
    August 14, 2021- SM Daily Journal- Skelly Contract Extension-
    “trustees Greg Land and Dwyer noted multiple long conversations had already been held in closed session, removing the need for further open discussion.
    A direct statement from the Trustees… The Board had held MULTIPLE CLOSED SESSION evaluation with Superintendent Skelly including a SPECIAL REVIEW.
    Trustee Lees Dwyer States:
    “There were no issues that would have created a reason not to give him a contract or give a raise,”
    Trustee Zuniga stated she voted to APPROVE the contract ONLY “after listening to her colleagues with more time on the board and finding that any issues could be rectified.”
    Evaluation of the Superintendent
    Seven Closed Session Evaluations and the Trustees knew NOTHING of what was going on….
    In August 2021, the SMUHSD Board of Trustees granted Superintendent Skelly a two-year contract extension at $329,000 per year.
    SMUHSD Records show that prior to granting Skelly the extensive contract and salary, the Trustee held at least SEVEN (7) Closed Session Evaluations of Superintendent Skelly, where he failed to disclose the actions of the district administration regarding state and local investigations of the superintendents.
    ** Special Session- This meeting is added by demand of the Trustees
    *** Special Session-Single Item- Closed Session- This is ONLY to evaluate the Superintendent.
    SMUHSD Board Agendas
    April 2021-August 2021-Deputy Superintendent of Human Resources Kirk Black and Superintendent Skelly were under investigation by the CTC based on a second complaint in less than a year.
    April 21, 2021- Commission on Teacher Credentialing- Formal Review of Dr Skelly and Dr. Black.-CTC recommends the suspension of the credentials of Superintendent Skelly and Deputy Superintendent of Human Resources Kirk Black . (The Board of Trustees was NOT INFORMED by the superintendents that they were under investigation- Dr. Black and Dr. Skelly use district funds and the district’s Lozano-Smith lawyers. All suppressed from the Board.
    May 6, 2021-Palo Alto Daily reports on the Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) credential suspension recommendation of Superintendent Skelly and Deputy Superintendent Kirk Black.
    May 6, 2021-Closed Session- SMUHSD Trustee-Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    May 13, 2021-Special Session- Closed Session- SMUHSD Trustee-Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    May 20, 2021- Special Session – Closed Session- SMUHSD Trustee-Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    June 10, 2021- -Closed Session- Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    June 21, 2021-Special Section-SINGLE ITEM Closed Session – Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    June 24, 2021-Closed Session- Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    June 30, 2021- Brown Act complaint filed with the San Mateo District Attorney’s Office. Administration was “manipulating” the public agenda and hiding administrative contracts to prevent public comment on Dr. Black’s 2021-2022 contract.
    July 1, 2021- Special Section
    -SINGLE ITEM Closed Session – Evaluation of Superintendent Skelly
    August 5, 2021- Special Session- Closed Session- Brown Act- Non-Represented Contracts FINALLY posted
    August 5, 2021
    SM Daily Journal -“Credential suspension is in limbo”- SMUHSD President Griffin “goes on the attack” against the Commission on Teacher Credentialing” (CTC) for its very investigation and charges against Skelly and Black.
    Trustee Griffen states- “The committee has acted irresponsibly and without regard to the facts, the law or the public interest in its decision.”
    (The Trustees had not seen the charges or evidence, but came out swinging in defense)
    SM Daily Journal
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/credential-suspension-is-in-limbo-for-3-san-mateo-union-high-school-district-administrators/article_837ce7ba-f59d-11eb-a963-cf7c2badc944?utm_source=smdailyjournal.com&utm_campaign=%2Fnewsletters%2Fheadlines%2F%3F-dc%3D1628172015&utm_medium=email&utm_content=headline
    August 12, 2021- Superintendent Kevin Skelly granted a Two-Year- $329,000 per year contract extension-
    August 16, 2021
    SM Daily Journal
    -Skelly’s Contract Extended
    The SMDJ called the two-year $329,000 per year extension, “A Vote of Confidence!”
    Trustees Land and Lees-Dwyer continued the attack on the CTC Investigators. Land (a credential holder) “claimed the investigation was “not done well.”
    Trustee Lees Dwyer “There were no issues that would have created a reason not to give him a contract or give a raise”
    (because the superintendent suppressed the facts over seven meetings!)
    SM Daily Journal
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/san-mateo-union-high-school-district-superintendent-kevin-skelly-s-contract-extended/article_166213b8-fcae-11eb-84bb-538cf9bc4594
    January 12, 2022- Superintendent Skelly resigns.
    During it March 2022 Meeting to select a new Superintendent, Trustees Land and Lees Dwyer -on a hot mic- confirmed Skelly’s “inability to communicate to the Trustees, who had to find out about the Superintendent’s credential suspension. from the Daily Journal.
    Watch the Trustees as they give video evidence of Skelly’s actions-
    At 1:56:00 (cued) The Trustees- confirm Skelly’s actions he misled the Board
    Trustee Peter Hanley states (Skelly)
    “Tell us EVERYTHING and TELL US FIRST”
    Trustees Land and Lees Dwyer (on video)-are vigorously “nodding” in agreement about Skelly’s lies and then they “break up laughing” at finding out about the lies “in the newspaper.”
    https://www.youtube.com/live/wZhD9JG-iko?feature=share&t=6968

  17. SMUHSD- BHS- Grand Jury Reference File

    Grand Jury Reference File:
    The BV has been a protected Free Speech portal providing the Burlingame Community a place to review and comment on the facts.
    The links below not only preserve a timeline of the events, but the archived comments of the public as well.
    Information has been posted under a variety of identities BECAUSE of the known and documented retaliation.
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2021/08/smushd-suspensions-to-proceed-appeals-likely/comments/page/5/#comments
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2019/04/part-4-bhs-politics-in-the-classroom
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2018/01/parents-uniting-for-nelson-part-3
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2015/02/bhs-no-6
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2016/02/bhs-teacher-conflict
    BHS English Department…
    “We have the texts, snaps, and emails and everyone is going to know about you. Your father will be so disappointed.”
    The writer of these words will recognize the phrase…

  18. Evidence- Do not remove this thread- Read Bruce Dickinsons’ post

    See- Bruce Dickison’s post (above) of August 5, 2021.
    Joe-Please Don’t remove this thread as it is evidence.
    “If there’s any takeaway from the whole SMUHSD debacle (other than the obvious problems with governance) is that due to KRN and a few other astute observers, the shenanigans of what happened at BHS and the District was exposed very early on and reported on the very pages of the BV!”
    The posts above from August 2021-forward and made some folks VERY angry that their (factual) dirty laundry was in the public square.
    The retaliation (using the power of their positions and funds of the district) has been significant, yet both foolish, and embarrassing.
    Retaliation against a complainant is a violation under the law. The same can be said of lying while under the penalty of perjury.
    It is believed that during the September 9, 2021 Board Meeting, the Trustees put their retaliation into a “Letter of Support,”in a public action to advance the “will of the people” represented by the Trustees. The letter, addressed to an investigator of the Commission on Credentialing (CTC), clearly resembles an action to tamper with the investigation process.
    The letter, dated September 10, 2021 is on the district letterhead and signed by the Board President.
    There are NO listing on the Board Agenda or published Board Minutes identifying the letter. There is no copy of the letter attached for public review.
    Who initiated this action?
    Someone put the item on the agenda to disucuss and create the letter, they also wrote the issues and a large body of legal statements (a lawyer) for the Board. took a vote (included in the letter).
    The public minutes do not reflect the agenda item, who called the vote, a second, a recording of the votes, and a copy of the published letter as required by law.
    Why was this letter constructed under the cover of darkness and held in secrecy for the past two years?
    What could the Board and Administration possibly want to conceal from the public?
    “The Board of Trustees has unanimously authorized and directed me (Griffin) to transmit this letter to you and the Commission…”
    The September 10, 2021 Letter is signed as
    follows
    Very truly yours,
    Robert H. Griffin
    President, Board of Trustees
    San Mateo Union High School District
    cc: to John D. Nibbelin,
    Chief Deputy County Counsel, Office of the San Mateo County Counsel
    Mr. Nibbelin is the legal counsel for the Trustees… so the Board’s lawyer did NOT write the letter?
    Who is the lawyer who was “attempting to hijack the SMUHSD Trustees and the CTC process?”
    To the SMUHSD Trustees-
    Where is the letter?
    The Board created it with the public’s trust, time, and money. It belongs to the people.

  19. Editor

    I appreciate the comment. Just for the record, we remove very few and I mean very, very few comments. Very, very, very few and even fewer that are cogent. TypePad does have some decent spam control features that have snared similiar comments to this that have embedded links, long cuts&pastes, etc. We do not check the spam file very often but have noticed TypePad is active on these sorts of posts. When we find them in the spam file, we clear them for publication.

  20. Trustees were compromised-Aug 2011-Investigation and Charges?

    These are legal obligations of the Board of Trustees-
    BP 1312.1 Any complaint regarding the Superintendent shall be initially filed in writing with the Board. The Board shall consult with legal counsel or appoint an appropriate agent to conduct the investigation.
    AR 1312.3
    Individuals who knowingly give false statements in an investigation shall be subject to discipline up to and including suspension, expulsion, and or dismissal, as shall any individual who is found to have retaliated against another in violation of this policy.
    This post finds its origins in August 2021. The Trustees CAME OUT in the SM Daily Journal DEFENDING the administration rather than investigating them-
    March 2022- Trustees disclose Skelly’s “problems with the truth”
    (watch for yourself, the video does not lie!)
    “We’ had problems with Skelly’s communications…” “we need a person who is going to tell us FIRST…”
    Trustee Dwyer:
    “Before it’s in the newspaper!”
    Land and Lees-Dwyer “break up laughing”



    SM Daily Journal- Statements-
    Robert Griffin, president of the San Mateo Union High School District Board of Trustees, reacted to the news in an email statement, sharing disappointment the committee’s chose not to reconsider “its initial erroneous decision.”
    “Each of these administrators have exemplary records of service,” Griffin said. “The committee has acted irresponsibly and without regard to the facts, the law or the public interest in its decision.”
    “We are confident that when, and if, this matter reaches the Attorney General’s Office for review, no adverse action will be taken against these outstanding administrators,” Griffin said.
    (Jan 2022- Skelly abruptly- “resigns )
    Land and Lees Dwyer-
    “In separate phone interviews after the meeting, trustees Greg Land and Dwyer noted multiple long conversations had already been held in closed session, removing the need for further open discussion. Any criticism of Skelly was given in closed sessions
    (The Trustee held seven(7) Closed Session Evaluation of Skelly (many on Special Meetings) In these “evaluations” the facts and information requested by the Trustees was not disclosed. The Board knew nothing of the incidents until AFTER the SM Daily Journal Articles.
    Alternatively, Land and Dwyer said they did not take into consideration the potential suspension of Skelly’s education credentials.”
    (According to BP 1312.1- They were required to open an investigation of Skelly– not praise him)
    Trustee Land shared disapproval for the CTC’s decision and claimed the investigation was “not done well.”
    Land is the President of the SM County School Boards Association and HE is critical of the CTC whose JOB it is to investigate wrongdoing?
    The Trustees had NO access to any evidence- they were given talking points by Skelly and Black’s lawyer- paid for by the SMUHSD.
    Credentials in Limbo
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/credential-suspension-is-in-limbo-for-3-san-mateo-union-high-school-district-administrators/article_837ce7ba-f59d-11eb-a963-cf7c2badc944
    Skelly’s Contract
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/san-mateo-union-high-school-district-superintendent-kevin-skelly-s-contract-extended/article_166213b8-fcae-11eb-84bb-538cf9bc4594

  21. Under Penalty of Perjury – September 10, 2021

    When you sign your name under the phrase,
    “I declare under the penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California, the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and recollection,”
    You should be sure that all of the documents that show you committing perjury are hidden, otherwise you might end up in a deposition and be cross examined by your sworn statements.
    Postmarks are evidence-
    August 25, 2021
    November 23, 2021

  22. “A” Trustee – leaking strategic confidential information

    Why were the SMUHSD Trustees deliberating and acting on items “not on any agenda” taking votes, and producing documents where these items are NOT reported out in the legal Minutes?
    Why have Trustees also “leaked” private documents to create an appearance of impropriety by others when the negligence is sitting at the district office and Burlingame High School?
    The evidence shows a coordinated effort and the use of public power(and money) for private benefit.
    Start building the Arc, there is a flood coming.
    The Trustees who were not present, have a simple choice- open the investigation and keep clean.
    “up to and including….dismissal”
    AR 1312.3
    Individuals who knowingly give false statements in an investigation shall be subject to discipline up to and including suspension, expulsion, and or dismissal, as shall any individual who is found to have retaliated against another in violation of this policy.

  23. Trustees- to the Daily Journal- “Just the facts(?)- hoodwinked-

    See above-
    “The one where Skelly and Black’s lawyer puts words in the Trustees mouths.”
    The Trustees represent the people and their tax dollars and not the “Good Ole Boys Club.”
    In August-September 2021, the SMUHSD Trustees Griffin, Hanley, Land, and Lees-Dwyer rallied around “Good Ole Boy” Skelly and gave hime everything he wanted while he “picked their pockets.”
    The Trustees made comments to the media, as the elected officials of the public, without knowledge of the origins or authenticity of the statements. (They lied?)
    The Trustees have an obligation to the public to STATE, the origins and sources of their (Griffin, Land, Lees-Dwyer) comments to Sierra Lopez of the SM Daily Journal for her August 5 and August 14, 2021 articles below.
    The Trustees’ source is believed to be heavily tainted with the intent of leveraging the Board’s Trust… and it worked.
    The September 10, 2021 letter is believed to be from the same source for the same reason.
    Its time to tell the truth–
    The Trustees need to be a model of ethics and transparency-
    Credentials in Limbo
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/credential-suspension-is-in-limbo-for-3-san-mateo-union-high-school-district-administrators/article_837ce7ba-f59d-11eb-a963-cf7c2badc944
    Skelly’s Contract
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/san-mateo-union-high-school-district-superintendent-kevin-skelly-s-contract-extended/article_166213b8-fcae-11eb-84bb-538cf9bc4594
    Are you smarter than a middle-schooler?
    (handwriting on the bottom left hand corner?)

  24. Aug-Sept 2021- BHS- Billboard for perjury- What the “butcher’s bill”

    SMUHSD Trustees-
    September 10, 2021
    Letter of Support for Ms. Melissa Murphy from Governing Board of the San Mateo Union High School District
    To:
    Investigator
    Commission on Teacher Credentialing
    Go to the top of this thread-(August 5, 2021) and read- (Jump to Sept 1 even better)
    Its a “play by play” of the facts that Skelly and Black did not want the public to know.
    Notice the date of the Letter of Support for Ms. Murphy- September 10, 2021-
    Funny how this all fits together?
    Why was the Letter of Support” needed?
    Joe Friday- “just the facts”

  25. It is very Ironic that the hearings we have all reading are “Skelly Hearings.”
    Look it up.

  26. Trustees “feigning ignorance” of Superintendent’s malpractice.

    Trustees “feigning ignorance” of the Skelly-Black malpractice.
    At the SMUHSD School sites on Tuesday while the children were at home, the teachers went through a “professional development” exercise on “values.”
    Posters with VALUE STATEMENTS were put up on the wall and teachers walked around the room with post-its, placing messages under each value.
    One large poster stated-
    HONESTY-as a core value of the SMUHSD.
    One post-it, pasted underneath stated, “Tell the Truth!”
    The Trustees of the SMUHSD need to Tell the Truth. The Trustees were intentionally defrauded and have expended excessive amounts of tax payers funds on the Skelly-Black legal defense. –Fraud
    Trustees Land and Trustee Griffin need to see themselves as targets or “the mark,” an ignorant and impressionable person of power who could be easily manipulated.
    Land and Griffin, you are victims of manipulation to carry our these highly improper actions and cover up what should have been police investigations.
    The SMUHSD Board action dated September 10, 2021,- Letter of Support for Ms. Melissa Murphy from Governing Board of the San Mateo Union High School District,
    – is not found on any public agenda or published minutes, yet it is a legal document, produced via the public process, written on SMUHSD district letterhead, signed by Trustee President Griffin with the “unanimous support” of the Trustees.
    The public has requested to know (via public record action) WHO requested that you produce this known fraudulent letter? The information in the letter is known to be false, and it has been forwarded to Sacramento to defraud a valid and ongoing CTC of Skelly and Black.
    Who requested that this “document” be produced and why was the Trustees attorney, the San Mateo County Counsel, strategically prevented from participation in the construction or review of the letter?
    As you know NOW… what actions took place on September 5, 2021 and again on September 16, 2021 as (silently) reported to the San Mateo Police, but NOT to the Trustees or the state investigators.
    Why are the FACTS being withheld from the police and the state?
    The Trustees have a legal and ethical obligation to act, either at the time of the fraud or when it is disclosed to them.
    Public requests for the simple agenda or minutes placement of this item are met with silence. Law enforcement has been required to investigate yet “another” Brown Act violation of the Trustees, as you were misled by your employees.
    The current Board of Trustees and the SMUHSD as an organization is damaged when it refuses to disclose to the sunlight, simple acts of the Board-
    What were you hiding and why?
    A tranche of evidence has been produced over the years, illustrating that the -prior- SMUHSD Trustees (Land-Griffin) have been anything but HONEST and ETHICAL.
    They were the marks, those to be defrauded, and they too are victims of the lies-
    They are now too embarrassed to tell the truth and hold their superintendents responsible as required by law- A complete and fully independent investigation of the Skelly-Black era is required as this cancer has spread among the SMUHSD leadership and continues to infect the organization, leaving it impotent to function or grow.
    Evidence has been produced that the Trustees contributed to and enabled Superintendent Skelly and Deputy Superintendent Black to engage in ongoing acts of willful negligence as the Trustees sat by “feigning ignorance” of the malpractice, while paying the legal bills of its employees.
    The evidence which covers a period of over a year show that current Trustee Griffin and Trustee Land enabled and assisted the district office leaders in violations of local, state, and federal law, willfully ignoring written reports and complaints of the wrongdoings.
    Known reports to the local police (multiple cities) and state investigative agencies have been ignored by the Trustees who “backed” these grifters.
    The documents include public Board actions -taken to cover up the administrators’ actions and “willful ignorance” once they the superintendents were caught.
    The Trustees continue to ignore public record requests for information, documents, and expense reports of the public’s money and its expenditures.
    Trustee Griffin is a CPA and his signature on documents stands for honesty, integrity, and ethics, yet there is not action taken by the Trustees
    Trustee Land is a Middle School Principal and knows first-hand the lies told by children to “get away” with illegal actions, yet there is no action taken by the Trustees.
    In August 2021, these Trustees attacked the California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CTC) Educator Misconduct Committee’s Investigators, claiming “malpractice” by the state, only to learn later that the FACTS disclosed by the investigators were correct and true.
    Once the FACTS were properly disclosed to the Trustees, they have been active in suppressing the actual events and blocking a proper legal and fiscal investigation of Skelly, Black, and the legal firm who directed these actions, violating the ethics and integrity of the SMUHSD Trustees-
    A new logo is not going to fix the SMUHSD, its just going to distract the leadership from the cancer that is eroding the organization.
    Where is an independent legal investigation?
    Where are the ethics and transparency of the public board?
    Where is the SM Grand Jury?
    “On we go!”
    The SMUHSD have no idea what transpired, but they did use the public’s money to pay the legal bills, to defraud the state.
    https://www.burlingamevoice.com/2022/10/smushd-suspensions-avoided-litigation-continues

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading