Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

BSD: Between a Rock and Classroom Hard Place

For once I don't have a dog in this fight, but from what I am hearing and reading on the School post here, there are strong feelings on both sides of the issue of when to reopen in-person learning at the Burlingame Elementary Schools.  One can only imagine the concern over months and months of video classes for young kids and the absence of school sports, band, plays, speech and language help, etc.  The goodly number of kids at my nearby park (Pershing) daily after school hours is not nearly as many as there are kids in the neighborhood.

Here are excerpts from the latest message from the BSD Board of Trustees:

The recent and sudden changes made by the state which forced our school district to remain in distance learning have been frustrating for all of us. We know that it has been challenging for parents to explain to our youngest learners why, once again, they will not be going to school…San Mateo County is made up of 24 school districts, of which only 3 are open for some in-person learning, with the remaining districts at various stages of reopening plans and waivers. Burlingame School District is next in line for live instruction, with an approved reopening safety plan and approved waiver already in place….If it is safe for one district to conduct in-person education with an approved plan, then it should be safe for all districts with an approved plan.

The state hasn't been exactly helpful in this regard although a comment from Guido (apparently a teacher) on the post linked above does note:

Time to pause and not do anything stupid, I guess they think we are lazy and that's why we should be back in class. I would be teaching with a mask on and the kids in front of screens under the current conditions and probably the "Red" tier. Can't share materials, etc. By the way, the State didn't change the the rules, they clarified them for stupid administrators who can't read and are trying to force the issue for some reason.

Data might help here–or not; but the San Mateo County website provides some here.  As of yesterday, kids age 9 and below have accounted for 2,167 cases out of almost 34,000 (about 6.5%) so it's small but not insignificant.  The 34,000 total is about 4.4% of the county population.  The question is really "What are the trade-offs?"  Are the risks (well known and real) of not reopening worse than the risk of doing so?  Answering that question is what school board elections are all about, but we have to agree this was completely unexpected and not discussed as there were no debates the last time around.  I'm guessing that might change next time.

Posted in

86 responses to “BSD: Between a Rock and Classroom Hard Place”

  1. hollyroller@gmail.com

    It will be OK if our children are forced(out of Classroom Settings) to learn at home for a few years.
    I truly believe the “studies” done regarding our children’s inability to learn at home, are done by “Greedy Narcissist’s Brainiac’s” who do not have the time or desire to raise a “normal human.”

  2. Paloma Ave

    Things change as time goes by. I also have no horse in the race, but I am wondering what is being taught.
    Are reading, writing and arithmetic still being taught, along with English, history and other basics?
    Or does it seem as if children are being indoctrinated into becoming activists or advocates (two terms I despise).
    Okay, I am daring to say this, “Maybe it is time to abolish public education. This way parents can decide what their children need to learn, in order to be successful in life.

  3. hollyroller@gmail.com

    How many Burlingame Residents under the age of 35 can check the oil, remove and replace a Flat tire?
    I say less than 1%. What do you think?

  4. Amazing

    You asked about silver linings a couple of weeks ago. One silver lining is I can stand off to the side of my kid’s computer and listen in on what is being taught. Paloma is right to be worried. I may run for the board if things don’t improve.

  5. BillyGBob

    When we were at BSD recently, the subjects taught were still pretty much the same ones I had in the 70s and 80s (though I lived in a different state). From what I can tell from current students and teachers (in multiple districts), the main differences from my schooling are an increased focus on evidence-based arguments and critical thinking, understanding there are multiple ways to solve math problems, and a general update of examples and topics to make subjects more relevant, accessible, and engaging to today’s students). Also, while using evidence and critical thinking can certainly increase one’s effectiveness as an advocate or activist, those aren’t the goals of the curricula.

  6. Guido

    Wow Paloma Avenue, you sound like you live in Texas. We don’t “indoctrinate” kids in Burlingame, we teach them the 3 R’s and so much more. Anyone is free to yank their kids out of public school that your property taxes pay for an do home schooling or pay for private school. I think those latter two options are not as good as public school, but then I am a public school teacher. Did you see the mess that the ridiculous “Secretary of Education” made the last four years? Unbelievable that clowns like that who have never been to a public school or taught in one or sent their kids to one could be in the highest post for education in the country. Stupid is what we would call that. Go ahead and yank your kids, they are probably the ones angry mom was talking about, that waste my time disciplining them only to have “restorative justice” do nothing at all. That’s why you see swastikas at BHS and all the related. You people need to demand more from the leadership. Joe, thanks for keeping it real, I don’t know everything, but I do know something about education and this town, been doing it for a bit. So tired of the BS indoctrination trope. “So Called” administrators and leaders are the problem, not the teachers. Thanks for reading.

  7. Cork

    Guido, judging by the poor grammar in your post, please tell us you don’t teach English.

  8. Gavinius Caesar

    I, Gavinius Caesar, declare open private schools to be the best for….my kids. You Empire subjects must figure the rest out yourselves.

  9. Paloma Ave

    Guido – https://bellagiovillas.com/villa-del-balbianello/

  10. Joe

    In the news today:
    A newly released study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows COVID-19 spread in schools appears to be low, suggesting in-person learning might be safe if proper procedures are in place.
    The study, released Tuesday, was made among 17 rural Wisconsin schools, grades K-12, from Aug. 31-Nov. 29.
    During the survey period, teachers reported more than 92% of students wore masks, groups of students were limited to 11-20, staff kept a distance of at least 6 feet when possible, and staff and students quarantined after exposure.
    During the 13 weeks, only 7 school-attributed COVID cases of the 4,876 students – and none of the 654 staff – were attributed to COVID.

  11. Science-Safe(?)-Is the HVAC even working?

    “The question is really “What are the trade-offs?” Are the risks (well known and real) of not reopening worse than the risk of doing so? Answering that question is what school board elections are all about, but we have to agree this was completely unexpected and not discussed as there were no debates the last time around.”
    Joe posted the question (above) but it has been on the table with no answer.
    The SMUHSD Board members and the Administration HAVE been asked the structure and safety questions during multiple meetings and the response is always silence.
    The science in the equation means that the schools HAVE the PPE and HVAC systems to properly operate and re-open.
    Do the BSD and SMUHSD schools have the proper PPE and HVAC systems to open?
    In the SMUHSD, the answer is and always has been, NO.
    What is the maximum number of students a school can have on the campus at one time?
    Can BHS have more than 300 at once? (yes only 300 at once)
    So why the misleading statements and lies from the top?
    After the cancellation of real grades for hardworking students last spring, the SMUHSD administration enabled significant conflict and disruption among parents in the community as parent groups went to war over opening the school. These conflicts became extremely contentious and one group of parents has had to remain undercover because of threats from others.
    The district officials knew all along that it was impossible to open the schools and the parents fighting against one another would deflect guilt from the district.
    The SMUHSD administration presented extremely flawed data as facts (Board members ripped into the administration regarding its inability to produce a minimally productive survey question) and continued to gaslight the public and the Board regarding its ability to open the schools.
    The SMUHSD administration not only failed to produce a re-opening plan (the administration did not have a plan to present to the board and coopted one from a group of SMHS teachers and parents. The administration then presented the plan as their own) but they knew the facilities were not functional to open. It has been one big lie.
    The Boards should make a public statement regarding the physical preparedness of the structures and HVAC systems to handle the re-opening of the schools. The science REQUIRES the systems to function, otherwise it isn’t science.
    The SF Unified Schools have a Dashboard showing progress to open?
    The SF district reports that it has only made 50% progress on the safety of its buildings. At least the families in SF know the buildings are not safe to open.
    Before the riots break out again, get the only answer that is needed right now.
    Are the schools structurally safe to open (HVAC) and how many students can be on the campus at once.

  12. hollyroller@gmail.com

    S-S(?)-Is the HVAC even work?
    Dear HVAC Business Owner.
    Do you have any children in Public School?
    Do you have any children in Private school?
    It has been obvious that within the last 50 years, Public Schools have lacked the basic infrastructure maintenance necessary to create a safe learning environment.
    Prop 13/Lottery Tickets were supposed to improve Public Schools. WTF Happened?
    In my humble opinion, ZERO LEADERSHIP.

  13. HMB

    From the CA lottery website: “Remember, Lottery funds are meant to supplement public education, not replace state and local funding. … All Lottery funding is distributed to public education based on the Average Daily Attendance (ADA) information provided by the State Controller’s Office. … Lottery funds account for less than 1.5% of all education funding. Funds are distributed to K-12 schools, community colleges, the California State University, the University of
    California, the Hastings College of the Law, the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation-Division of Juvenile Justice, the Department of Education-State Special Schools, the Department of Developmental Services, and the Department of State Hospitals.”
    GRADE LEVEL & DISTRIBUTION PERCENTAGE
    K-12th Grade 80%
    Community Colleges 13.9%
    California State University System 3.7%
    University of California 2.3%
    Other Educational Entities 0.1%
    So, if you are so inclined to look at a school district’s budget and check the ADA, you’ll see what a drop in the bucket that ‘lottery windfall’ really is.

  14. Luv Kitten

    this thread is about The Burlingame School Dist. which is Elementary School through Intermediate School (BIS), not High School or the San Mateo High School District.
    Latest news is they may reopen next Thursday 2/4 if and only if San Mateo county remains under 25/100,000 for 5 consecutive day AND The California Department of Public Health approves their Covid Safety Plan.
    If the above is successful they will submit a modified waiver to get the remaining grades back in school.
    As for the BSD board they are not voted in, there were two recent openings and only two candidates so both got the positions.
    I dug inot the boards back grounds and many of them do not have careers. Some seem to have retired in their 30s or 40s, and some have higher levels of education but never were employable in the areas they studied. It seems like some of the board members are doing this for some type of self worth or then need to feel important. Not sure what their agenda is but it doesn’t seem to be in the favor of education and students.
    There is no diversity in the board they all agree with each other on all topics and the Supe. They want to remain popular and well liked. One board member seems to be using the platform to become a Science Teacher in the District.
    Where are the checks a balances?
    Most of the crazy Karens that were vocal a few months ago gave up.
    As stated in the Bible “You reap what you sow”.
    No wonder they are in a financial mess.

  15. Lorne

    Personally, my impression is that the two new board members were handpicked, behind-the-scenes, by the BSD powers-that-be when the former two board members decided to not seek re-election. I realize this is probably par for the course as far as these things go, and please know I have nothing against the two new members, nor the ones they replaced. But frankly, this “process” come across as un-democratic and leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Bottom line, I wish the public would be broadly informed whenever a BSD board member announces his/her intention to step down to the board/Superintendent, so that there’s potentially a broader pool of candidates to fill the vacancy, who can then be appropriately vetted by the community they are serving.

  16. OBoy

    Gavin Newsom’s school reopening plan looks pretty dead
    https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Gavin-Newsom-school-reopening-plan-teachers-union-15908623.php

  17. Lorne

    Per my earlier post above- this past November was yet another uncontested BSD board election:
    http://forms.smartvoter.org/2020/11/03/ca/sm/race/5006/

  18. A parent

    Burlingame parent of 2 elementary school students, here. We should be clear on what’s happening. We are failing to educate our kids, on a mass level, with the worst impacts on the kids whose parents have less. Sure, it’s complicated to open, but public schools around the Bay have been open, some of them since September. And, no, I don’t hate teachers. I don’t think teachers should have to die anymore than I think the grocery store workers should have to die in order to sell us a bunch of bananas, but to have that be the end of it is ridiculous. I don’t really understand the point of view that any Burlingame resident lives here without a ‘horse in the race’. People who can afford to are leaving the Burlingame School District and putting their kids in private schools or moving to other districts that are open. The budget implications of that alone will wreak havoc on the schools for a generation, and it will have real impacts on the entire town of Burlingame, whether you have kids or not.

  19. Bruce Dickinson

    Alright folks, this return-to-school issue is quite contentious and underlies a much bigger issue than COVID. So sit back and relax for a Bruce Dickinson-led Masterclass on power politics and when we’re done here, not only will ya’ll be wearing gold plated diapers, but you’ll understand one thing: The California Teachers Association (CTA) has had way too much power, and it may be high-time to bust the union! Full disclosure: my granddaughter is a student in the BSD, and I believe she should be in school.
    The reality is, the CTA has accumulated massive amounts of power since the passage of, you guessed it, Prop 13! They are HUGE donors to the Democratic party, including Gavin Newsom. Once you understand this, the path that we took with respect to the school re-openings (or non-reopenings) makes total sense. Prop 13, by virtue of limited property tax increases, had the effect of reducing school funding over the next decades, starting in the 1980s. This is exactly when CA schools began to deteriorate. To deal with the funding issues and ensure that they don’t become victims of forever lower pay, the CTA became more effectively organized, charged its members more, and strongly advocated for democratic candidates as the CA demographics began to shift. And why not, with decreased school funding, deteriorating education, wouldn’t it make sense to protect teacher salaries, ensure nice pensions, and make it very difficult for schools facing funding challenges to fire teachers? Did you know that due to the CTA union agreements, a teacher can ask for a one year leave of absence for any reason? That’s why today, behind the scenes in the local chapter CTA/district negotiations, the CTA is saying “look, if you force teachers to go back to school, 20% of the teachers will take their leaves of absence, and you (school district) are screwed!” So basically the districts are held hostage…if 20% of the teachers leave, then parents will really get freaked out.
    The CTA over the years has gotten used to amassing so much power underneath everyone’s noses and it never really got noticed, until a real crisis hit and now everyone is questioning where is the leadership? Today, due to fears and mis-information about the virus, the CTA and it’s members are saying that COVID is making it extremely unsafe to return to school (which is really an opinion and not grounded in any basis of fact, which is ironic coming from educators). The CTA aren’t the health experts. The WHO, CDC, San Mateo Health, UCSF/Stanford infectious disease experts, the American Society of Pediatricians, all universally say that the cost of kids not being in school outweighs the very risk to Teachers, they families, and families of students. Yes, some older teachers will have to be protected (and should not be mandated to go back to school), and yes some parents are not comfortable in returning to school, but there are protections in place (including 100% distance learning options) that have pretty much proven that you can get risk down to a level that is LOWER than your typical family gathering. And that’s not theory, that’s what the data shows, overwhelmingly! Folks, CA is basically one of the last few States where kids are not back in school, and that’s including Red states, Blue states, high case-load states, low case load states, not to mention most schools internationally. The data exists for millions of students globally which demonstrably shows that schools are not a significant factor for the spread of COVID.
    Now back to our handsome, talented politician-governor-foodie, Newsom. Notice how he is completely tap dancing around the union issue. His thinking is “Ok, so the CTA can play hardball at the local level, I will minimize any sorts of comments urging a return to school and let the CTA deal with school boards, districts and parents etc, and while they do that, I will continue to receive large sums of money for my re-election and potentially presidential aspirations and try to stay out of this controversy as much as possible.” Now you might say Bruce Dickinson, is this what he is really thinking? My answer is absolutely YES. Read/listen to every word he has said and will say going forward, knowing the CTA/large donation/political support nexus, and everything makes sense. Let me leave you with one nugget, where it is so obvious. Reporters (who are by the way asking much tougher questions to Newsom lately), recently asked if once teachers get vaccinated, will he try to get them to return to school (and btw, even with vaccines, the CTA doesn’t want teachers to go back).
    https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Gavin-Newsom-schools-reopen-teachers-union-vaccine-15856522.php
    The notable quote here is this: “Our approach is not to do it top down and mandate,” Newsom said Friday. “It’s to have a collaborative framework with real incentives that allow for resource allocation to occur when people are committed to promoting the cause of in-person education.”
    Two takeaways: 1) what does that statement even mean!??! 2) if you don’t believe the CTA is in Newsom’s pocket, Bruce Dickinson has a bridge for sale that you might want to buy!

  20. hollyroller@gmail.com

    BIG D…
    Welcome back!
    When I have some time I will read the comments.

  21. resident

    “Our approach is not to do it top down and mandate,”
    Oh, that’s rich. Can we do that on electric cars, wildfires, cap and trade, local zoning, transportation funds AND school reopening?

  22. HMB

    Might as well take my comment down since you deleted the one of holly’s I was responding to.

  23. Editor

    Done. I really don’t want to get into doing this on a regular basis, but I will if I have to.
    holly: I’m running out of patience. Just stop the nonsense, please.

  24. Kirk

    New COVID-19 variant is a ‘red flag’ for San Mateo County
    A new COVID-19 variant is linked to several large outbreaks in San Mateo County, including one in the Kaiser San Jose Medical Center, according to an announcement from health officials on Jan. 17.
    The variant, known as 452R, is different from the rapidly spreading strain in the United Kingdom and has now been observed in 12 counties across California. First detected in Denmark in March and later in Alameda County in May, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has now reported 88 cases of the variant in the United States, 40 of which are in California.

  25. hollyroller@gmail.com

    OK Editor.
    I would really like to know how “Content” is “discerned” for Broadcast on the BV.
    During the 1970’s The US was worried about Pornography.
    Prior to that, The SCOUS debated Comic Books effect on Children.
    US Senate, and possibly SCOUS’s response-(I am Paraphrasing) was “I will know it-(Pornography) when I see it.”
    We all see what we want to based on many Factors.
    The Late George Carlin used to talk about “7 Words” Not to be used… What are the BV 7 Words? That would be a Big Help to me.
    Happy Black History Month All.

  26. Editor

    How about you just stay on topic? That would be a good start. Your deleted comment didn’t have the slightest thing to do with whether BSD reopens for live classes or not–not even in the right universe. And the one right above is pretty much the same. Certainly don’t need a tutorial on managing a blog from you.

  27. Just Looking

    New variants will always come. It’s really no excuse to keep the schools closed. And by the way, San Jose is not in San Mateo County. Just sayin’

  28. hollyroller@gmail.com

    Sending any children back to school is using them as a “Canary in a Coal mine.” I believe that once all students and Educators are Vaccinated, classroom education can continue.
    Not a day sooner.

  29. Barking Dog

    Holly, I see your SEIU and your sisters CTA union’s are hard at work getting the propaganda out to its members.
    I know my 5 elementary/middle school age grandkids will not be getting the vaccine in the near future. Does that mean they can’t/shouldn’t be allowed to attend public school?

  30. Joe

    Here’s SM-FC picking up the pace:
    A plan to reopen middle schools amid the pandemic alarmed San Mateo-Foster City Elementary School District teachers who are concerned over potential health risks, but district officials are optimistic students can be brought back in a thoughtful and safe manner.
    The district Board of Trustees’ decision Thursday, Jan. 21, surprised members of the San Mateo Elementary Teachers Association, according to union president Julie MacArthur who had expected that older students would remain in remote learning for the rest of the school year.
    But school board President Ken Chin expressed confidence that the sticky issues encountered in the planning process can be navigated through by the April 12 timeline established for bringing middle school students back after spring break.
    https://www.smdailyjournal.com/news/local/middle-school-reopening-plans-stunning-to-san-mateo-foster-city-elementary-school-district-teachers/article_4dbca9ce-6512-11eb-a524-57ffccacd0cc
    A quick check of the SM County Covid site shows we had 18 new cases on Sunday and 14 yesterday–in the County…….

  31. hollyroller@gmail.com

    Dear Barking Dog,
    The Short Answer is YES!
    Before you BD, were allowed to go to Private /Public School, Our Parents were required to provide Proof of Polio, Measles, Chicken Pox, Mumps, Scarlet Fever, Vaccinations. (more or less) What bothers you?
    PS
    Lighten up on the Misogynism…
    I “get in trouble @ BV” for attempting to be Funny. Letting, you old man, speak of Women in the way you did, is not right.
    Joe, Editor, time to “Break Out the BV Board of Education.

  32. Joe

    Actually the word you are searching for is “misogyny”. Not only do you not know the correct spelling, but you apparently don’t really understand the meaning of the word either. There is no misogyny in BD’s comment. He may have left off an apostrophe. I don’t know, but it seems like BD may know who you and your family are–I don’t actually care. Sorry, you are mistaken about any misogyny.
    Again, I don’t need any coaching from you. Back to the topic?

  33. hollyroller@gmail.com

    I must have done something to anger you.
    I am sorry your feelings are hurt.
    BD:
    “I see your SEIU and your sisters are hard at work getting propaganda out-to it’s members.” (your SEIU and your Sisters, getting propaganda out)
    “Misogynism”
    Joe you are also wrong about the meaning, spelling, and the definition’s of the “Core Word,” misogyny.
    I hope this response does not upset you much more. You’ll be OK
    Take it easy Joe.

  34. Joe

    Just tired of your comments that go off the rails. The one I deleted was idiotic. There is no misogyny or misogynism (yes, it’s a word–seldom used, but I stand corrected) in Barking Dog’s comment. None. And yet here you are back again with the same claim.
    Bruce D’s comment said the same thing in many more words and the bit I put above about SM-Foster City does as well.
    Back on topic: It feels to me that the union(s) are about to make a big PR mistake. The question is do the actual teachers feel the same way as the union reps?

  35. TKelley

    So the word on the Ave is that TK-2 go back tomorrow, yes tomorrow. The board will follow up to modify the paperwork to get all grades back. Lets keep our fingers crossed it works.

  36. hollyroller@gmail.com

    Only “History” will determine what we do today. Allowing children and Educators to resume a communal classroom, lunch room, recess and playgrounds.
    Bathrooms, Art Class, Music, etc.
    Not a good time to be a Child/Teenager.
    It may be a good time to be an Attorney.
    The amount of rules that may be needed to create 6 foot, etc. will create fear. OCD. It is better for our kids to remain in a “safe place”. Home.

  37. hollyroller@gmail.com

    If anyone is a South Park Fan watch this evenings show.. Yes Joe, it does have something to do with this BV Thread.

  38. hollyroller@gmail.com

    “The Pandemic Special”

  39. Bruce Dickinson

    So, another observation from yours truly, Bruce Dickinson is that now that Trump is gone and the Democrats have control of Congress, pretty much disappearing are all the arguments that reopening schools is somehow a Trump/Red State/GOP idea. All of a sudden now that you have the Biden admin saying kids should be in school, people like the CTA or guv Newsom can no longer hide behind the politicisation of returning to school as being inherently unsafe (and flying in the face of overwhelming data). Now people can only focus on the data, and the data tells the entire story.
    Now, we have cities beginning to use the court systems to sue the school districts and the district BOARDS for gross negligence/incompetence! And surprise surprise, these Boards have very pro-teacher composition rather than truly independent watchdogs. In Washington DC and SF, the cities are trying to obtain injunctions to either prevent teachers striking or force their return to school.
    https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/San-Francisco-to-sue-its-own-schools-reopening-15921348.php?IPID=SFGate-HP-CP-Spotlight
    Who woulda thunk that sitting on a school board, you actually might have to be accountable to the parents and students you purport to represent!
    In Burlingame, the Board and District need to expand their waiver to include all Elementary school kids to go back (grades 3-5) and revise the plan for bringing the Jr. High kids back to school too (grades 6-8). The State and County has yanked the chain of the District/Board so many times now that the only thing this whole brouhaha is exposing is weak leadership and flat-footed decision making. And guess what, behind the crazy, inconsistent decisions of Newsom, State Health Officials, non-stances by our elected representatives, and the State and County Departments of Education is a CTA that is lobbying hard and threatening lawsuits.
    Well folks, lawsuits can work both ways, and here’s a crystal clear message to all school Boards across the State and the US:
    Whether at the ballot box or through litigation, bad decisions have consequences and actions.
    Welcome to accountability!

  40. hollyroller@gmail.com

    If the current San Mateo County School District Established Educators have to quit or be fired, who will replace them?
    That is a very strong “bargaining” platform.
    I believe that people who go into Education never thought one day their Profession may be as dangerous as Logging, Fishing, and Military.

  41. Science Denier

    This guy is a Science Denier and needs to be de-platformed.

  42. Bruce Dickinson

    So this question comes up, what happens if a bunch of teachers quit? We can’t let that happen! So we have to cave to every one of their demands! Right? No..Wrong!
    Well, let Dr. Dickinson use a little game theory in how I would deal with teachers who threaten to strike, quit etc. It may actually help things out a LOT in the long run.
    Already, kids are in distance learning and teachers quitting at this juncture can easily be synergized in online learning with existing teachers. That is, you can have one teacher each many more kids in an online setting, so losses can be tolerated with minimal educational quality loss (i.e. it’s already bad and class size doesn’t matter in distance learning).
    Let’s say 25% of the teacher base leaves. Those teachers will likely (not all but most) will be the weakest of the bunch and potentially more highly paid and most entrenched with the CTA.
    School districts should use this insistence of distance learning only to really “clean house” and get rid of the teachers who were nowhere to be found from March-June and those who have done minimal work. Instead with that savings, reward those who have done an exemplary job throughout distance learning.
    By creating an incentive system much like the private sector, there is actually a real prospect of “busting the union” and maybe even getting rid of CTA chapters. Instead of this, hire and reward teachers who do not contract with the union and offer them higher current pay perhaps in exchange for lower post retirement benefits. These benefits have long time escalators that are really squeezing school budgets and frankly the bigger issue in the Bay area for younger teachers especially is current pay. You can establish 401ks like every other sector practically and fund that with your higher current pay.
    I know this approach sounds radical, but this year is pretty much thrown away anyway in terms of education quality. Why not effectuate lasting change and have a decent chance of busting the CTA stranglehold on our schools and really ramp up the quality and accountability big time. Will be much easier going forward to get rid of bad teachers when not beholden to CTA collective bargaining agreements, restrictions etc.
    You don’t get to be a captain of industry by accepting the status quo!

  43. Alex

    A California school district reopened in-person learning. In two days, 81 students were quarantined.
    https://www.sfgate.com/education/article/A-California-school-district-reopened-in-person-15927588.php

  44. Bruce Dickinson

    Want to know how many cases are actually transmitted in schools? Just look at all the media reports, Bruce Dickinson can assure you the media will stiff out every single one. Fact of the matter is in aggregate the percentage of in school transmission is very very low and far, far lower in terms of deaths to students or teachers across hundreds of millions of children and millions of teachers. This is why the CDC, WHO, UCSF, and Stanford experts all say the kids should be in school. The small risks are way, way, way more than outweighed by the benefits.
    What the school districts are doing is right. The quarantining of dozens of kids in response to a handful of cases is exactly what should be happening under the auspices of a safe return to school. As should be regular testing, mask wearing, ventilation requirements, safety protocols and exercising abundance of caution.
    One-off anecdotes are really stupid way to guide pubic policy decisions let alone any real decision of consequence.
    But then again, that’s why yours truly is where he is! 😉

  45. hollyroller@gmail.com

    Covid is a relatively new disease that effects everyone.
    It to soon to accept “studies” that could have dire consequences for children.
    Unless you have an “Iron in the Fire” I believe the only people who have a Right to comment on this subject are Teachers, Parents, Children, and of course Science.
    Especially the Children-Victims.

  46. Science Denier

    Which one of these are you, denier?

  47. Guido

    Bruce, my Vette will blow doors on your Ferrari on El Camino and you know that for a fact. Statistics are great, but how many kids are in school? 10 percent? Hard to get a good read on Covid cases when most kids are at home, not at school. Bring it, Bruce. Bring your pink slip…

  48. Cassandra

    Expect Climate Crisis Shutdowns…
    We’ve been trained to wear our masks and be very, very quiet.

  49. MBGA

    Joe is posting stats from the county dashboard. In our county there are ZERO (NADA, ZIP, 000.00) deaths in the 0-9 age group. And ZERO deaths in the 10-19, and 20-29 age categories. There is one (1) death in the 30-39 category.
    Cases numbers going up and down in the five percent reange don’t mean much. They don’t even necessarily mean hospitalization.
    From the get go this has been mass hysteria. Those people that want to deny children a normal life have ulterior motives. Or at best are just extremely selfish at the expense of the younger generations whose lives are being destroyed.
    Let my people go (back to school),

  50. Paloma Ave

    “…younger generations whose lives are being destroyed.”
    Really? You’re not exaggerating are you?

Leave a Reply

RECENT COMMENTS

RECENT POSTS

CATEGORIES

ABOUT THE VOICE

The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading