Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

The Daily Post had a piece this week that I have not seen elsewhere.  Yesterday the County Supes were set to vote on a new "fee" for development on County land–meaning the unincorporated parts of the county.  I believe that would include a good sized chunk of the hills that we call B'game.  The rates proposed are:

— $15 per square foot for houses  (that's $60K on a 4,000 sf house)

— $10 per square foot for hotels

— $25 per square foot for offices

These "housing impact fees" would supposedly go to "low-income housing".  The $15 per sf housing fee was particularly asked about.  County manager John Maltbie is quoted in the piece saying, "Yes, market rate homes address some of the housing need, but they create a need for new workers in the community:  house cleaners, painters, landscapers, maintenance workers, service workers, teachers, mechanics….these workers are typically at wage levels too low to afford market-rate housing".    Ugh.  Econ 101 grade:  F.  Summer school reading recommendation: Adam Smith.

Posted in , , ,

6 responses to “County “Fee” Grab”

  1. Local Motion

    Does sixty grand still qualify as a fee?

  2. Bruce Dickinson

    Joe, this county manager sounds like he needs an elementary school level education on how to make a cogent argument. So is he saying that if you create low income housing, which draws LOWER income people, that cannot afford the low income housing that was originally designed to help those with low incomes? So what is the solution and what problem is it searching for exactly? Makes zero sense.
    I swear Bruce Dickinson with the help of my infinitely more talented staff could probably do a better job running the City and County with minimal, part-time dedication. Dumb decision making only begets doing unneeded, extraneous work and covering up past mistakes.
    We deserve MUCH better!

  3. Joe

    I’m not sure about that claim sir, but look at the twisted logic. You make the new housing more expensive with the tax (“fee” is a joke). That raises the price umbrella for all of the other housing including the lowest rungs. Then you somehow use an agency to try to dole out money to the lowest rung at an inflated government cost.
    Reagan said it best–I paraphrase. “Tax it until it stops moving then subsidize it when it can’t move.”

  4. lenj

    can you post a link to the article? much appreciated…

  5. Joe

    Sorry but the Post is a paper-only paper so no link is available.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading