Renter Protection or Store Owner Protection?

February 9, 2015

I'm just guessing here, but I will bet the "Burlingame Advocates for Renter Protection" flyers that have popped up on some vacant storefront windows on the Avenue were not placed there with the owner's or last tenant's permission. I've spent a good deal of time asking permission to place flyers that are a lot less controversial than this one and I know how cautious the tenants can be with their windows.

Renters flyer

Since I know a bit about community activism and advertising it, allow me to suggest to BARP that it would be viewed negatively in B'game to be advocating for "respect for people" by disrespecting other people's property.

Posted in City Council, Local Real Estate, Planning

One response to “Renter Protection or Store Owner Protection?”

mike

March 25, 2015

the last tenant is irrelevant since they are no longer a tenant…the owner on the other hand, is relevant. however, if the owners is not PRESENT to complain, then i doubt it’s a problem, certainly not as much a problem as the EMPTY STOREFRONT.

ABOUT THE VOICE

The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community. Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California. Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board. Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.