Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Question for everyone:  which is harder to do:  build a 3-4 mile long bridge or a 500 mile "high-speed" rail line?  I'm just asking, since it is not all that obvious that the state can pull off a $6.5 billion dollar project to rebuild half of a bridge.  Yet it wants to take $100 billion dollars we don't have to build a precision railroad through earthquake country.  Just askin'.  This is a particularly rich quote from the only real Senator on his side of the aisle in the Sacramento

Simitian suggested that it was odd that Wiles would have chosen to go "straight" on the Bay Bridge while faking other data.
"It seems a little hard to fathom why somebody's work would be without question rigorous in one venue but then problematic in other venues," Simitian said.

Just askin'.  Here's a photo of the bridge from Treasure Island…let's hope it's sound!

Bay Bridge from TI

Posted in , ,

2 responses to “High Cost Rail – Part 80 Just Askin’”

  1. Joe

    Here’s a brilliant letter to the Mercury Times
    mercurynews.com
    Can’t afford rail, don’t need tax
    I have voted three times for Jerry Brown. Because of the state’s fiscal problems, his fall tax measure has had my support. No more. If the state can afford a multibillion-dollar high-speed rail project, it doesn’t need to burden us with an added tax. The cost of building the system is unknown — absolutely unknown. There will be cost overruns. Every inch of the right of way will have to be litigated, bought or acquired by eminent domain. Once built, the line will have to be maintained and operated. The yearly cost is beyond actuarial estimation. Like all public transit, ridership will be subsidized. All will pay, a minority of Californians will benefit. Adding new jobs for thousands is desirable. It is not a question of what we want, but what we can afford. Jerry Brown won’t be getting my vote in November.
    Terry Denevan
    San Jose

  2. pat giorni

    Latest………..
    http://www.caltrain.com/Page1817.aspx
    Media Advisory: Caltrain to Announce Details of First ‘Early Investment’ Funding Release
    Media Advisory: Caltrain to Announce Details of First ‘Early Investment’ Funding Release
    By
    September 20, 2012
    Caltrain is hosting a news conference to announce a key funding allocation that will support critical work on an advanced signaling system, one of the corridor modernization projects funded through High Speed Rail’s ‘early investment’ program. The California Transportation Commission is expected to vote on whether to release nearly $40 million for Positive Train Control. The signaling system will provide the foundation for improved operations and safety and the advancement of electrification work later on.
    WHAT: Press Conference to Announce Funding Allocation
    WHO: Opening Remarks by Adrienne Tissier, Joint Powers Board Chair
    Speakers include:
    Tom Nolan, Joint Powers Board Director
    Rep. Jackie Speier
    Asm. Jerry Hill
    Sen. Leland Yee, Phd
    Asm. Fiona Ma
    WHERE: Caltrain Millbrae Station
    WHEN: Sept. 27th at Noon
    ###
    About Caltrain:
    The Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board owns and manages Caltrain. The JPB is a partnership among the San Mateo County Transit District, the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority and the City and County of San Francisco through the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. SamTrans is the managing partner. Caltrain’s contractor, Transit America Services, Inc., operates the 86 weekday trains, as well as weekend service along the rail corridor. Caltrain has experienced 24-months of consecutive ridership growth, reaching an all-time high of more than 50,000 average weekday riders in June 2012. As a result of this dramatic ridership growth, Caltrain will be going to 92-weekday trains on Oct. 1.

Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading