Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community

Today's news as reported by the AP in the Daily Journal and elsewhere is the Assembly's move to reign in the High-cost Rail Authority.

The Assembly voted 50-16 Friday to place the rail project under a new Department of High-Speed Trains within the existing Business, Transportation and Housing Agency…..Democratic Assemblywoman Cathleen Galgiani, of Livingston, said her AB145 would ensure sufficient oversight of the project, intended to link San Francisco with Los Angeles and Anaheim at speeds of up to 220 mph.

Sounds good right, but then she goes on to respond to another Assemblywoman with

“Don’t fool yourself that you are going to get money from the federal government” beyond the roughly $3.5 billion already awarded, said Harkey. “The private market is not going to come forward until a route is profitable.”

The high-speed rail system in France runs with a profit margin of 25 percent and the one on Japan at 50 percent, Galgiani responded.

Wrong.  Wrong, Wrong.  Not only is that ridiculous on its face, but check out this recent piece in The Economist where they note

The sole reason why Shinkansen plying the Tokaido route make money is the sheer density—and affluence—of the customers they serve. All the other Shinkansen routes in Japan lose cart-loads of cash, as high-speed trains do elsewhere in the world. Only indirect subsidies, creative accounting, political patronage and national chest-thumping keep them rolling.

Galgiani must know this, and if she doesn't, she's not doing her job!

 

Posted in

6 responses to “High-cost Rail Part 54 Liar, Liar, Pants on Fire”

  1. pat giorni

    Nice job, Joe:
    http://www.smdailyjournal.com/article_preview.php?type=opinions&title=Rail would strangle taxpayers&id=160533
    Rail would strangle taxpayers
    June 09, 2011, 03:49 AM Letter
    Editor,
    The latest spin from the high-speed railroaders is that HSR systems in other countries are profitable. Last week, Assemblywoman Cathleen Galgiani said the high-speed rail system in France runs with a profit margin of 25 percent and the one in Japan at 50 percent. This week, Thomas Umberg, the California High-speed Rail Authority chairman, wrote that every high-speed rail system in the world generates a profit. This is utter nonsense. As The Economist noted recently “The sole reason why Shinkansen plying the Tokaido route make money is the sheer density — and affluence — of the customers they serve. All the other Shinkansen routes in Japan lose cart-loads of cash, as high-speed trains do elsewhere in the world. Only indirect subsidies, creative accounting, political patronage and national chest-thumping keep them rolling.”
    The most charitable critique I can muster for Galgiani and Umberg is that they simply cannot read an income statement, but I fear they are deliberately misleading Californians to cover their tracks. It’s time they fess up, apologize to the public and correct their inaccuracies. Taxpayers should fear this permanent albatross around their necks.
    Joseph S. Baylock
    Burlingame
    The letter writer is a boardmember of High-Speed Boondoggle.

  2. Joe

    Thank you, Pat. I was trying to be polite but it’s difficult when you are dealing with IDIOTS. Ugh. Had to drive to San Jose today and I would love to see them spend .0001% of the HSR boondoggle funds on fixing 101!

  3. holyroller

    What do you people think of the SF Firemans Funeral?
    Summer Weekend
    Friday Afternoon
    SERIOUS TRAFFIC BS
    OVER ONE THOUSAND FIREFIGHTERS.
    FIRE DEPT.CARS, FIRE TRUCKS,CHP,TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS, HOMELAND SECURITY,LOCAL POLICE, AND NEWS REPORTERS.
    OVERTIME!
    PS
    I bet that no major buildings burned down, no earthquake happened, or Rioting on Burlingame/Broadway Ave.;anywhere in the SF Bay Area today.
    We really need to evaluate the amount of tax monies-personel spent on Police and Fire.

  4. jennifer

    Amazing video from 2008


Leave a Reply


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026

Discover more from The Burlingame Voice

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading