Category: SamTrans-Caltrain

  • Another regular Voice reader has offered to contribute on an important topic.  Local guy David Harris is a friend of mine who has spent a substantial amount of time reviewing the High-cost Rail machinations over the last few years.  Here he provides an important counterpoint to a local opinion piece:

    In Monday’s edition of The Daily Journal, Columnist Sue Lempert writes about the selection of Jim Hartnett to replace Mike Scanlon as general manager of SamTrans, executive director of Caltrain and executive director of the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. Near column’s conclusion she she says:

    “Then there is HSR where Hartnett’s experience and connections will come in handy. Despite the lawsuits which keep popping up, HSR is bound to happen (Hartnett called it a generational thing, meaning it make take a while for the entire system to get rolling). Before it will come Caltrain electrification, a much-needed environmental improvement which will also speed up the trains and allow for more stops. Most of the Peninsula cities are resigned with sharing Caltrain tracks with HSR, an improvement over the feared four-track system originally proposed. None of this will be easy and Hartnett has his work cut out for him.”

    It depends on how you feel about HSR whether Hartnett’s experience and connections will come in handy – and hopefully it won’t be easy. He was on the High Speed Rail Authority’s board of directors when it was basically tone-deaf to the concerns of Peninsula residents when the four-track system was originally proposed. He was also on the board when the Authority’s PR–as-stakeholder-engagement strategy further alienated residents and elected officials up and down the Peninsula, leaving it with very little credibility. This is something Central Valley and southern California residents also have found out the hard way. And we better hope that most Peninsula cities, or at least their voters, are not “resigned” to Caltrain sharing the tracks with HSR. Train volume is projected to increase from 92 Caltrains per weekday in 2015 to a combined 220 Caltrain and HSR trains per day in 2030 – more than double, according to data shared by Burlingame city staff at the March 11 Broadway Grade Separation meeting at the Burlingame Rec Center.

    Finally, it will not only be a “generational thing” to get the entire system rolling. It will also be a “generational thing” to come up with the estimated $55 billion needed to build the entire system, assuming of course the price tag remains at the current projected $68 billion. The next generation will be on the hook for even more money when costs inevitably increase.

    If I have learned anything over the years in both business and politics it is that very few things are "inevitable" (Death and Taxes excepted, Ben Franklin).  Thanks, David for calling this out.

  • I was out late last night for work, but Voice correspondent Betsy McGinn went to the big Broadway grade separation meeting and has filed this roving report and photo.  A big thank you, Betsy.

    Last night’s Broadway Grade Separation meeting at the Burlingame Rec Center was better attended than the planners predicted.  With 80 or more community members plus all Council members, the consulting team and several city department heads attending, it was SRO.  There were lots of new faces, which is always a good thing for community involvement.

    There was skepticism and concern by many, on topics ranging from “why is the city spending money to study to do a study?” (they are not – the city received $1 million for the study) to “Is this going to mean construction for countless years at this interchange given the current 101 project?” (good question!).  Several residents expressed concern about a grade separation promoting more traffic in the Broadway corridor and opening the door for high-speed Rail.  There was universal concern about the safety issues confronted by pedestrians and cyclists, not to mention what seems to be an increasingly common occurrence on the Peninsula – drivers unwisely stopping on the tracks with sometimes fatal consequences.

    After an initial presentation by the consulting team from Apex Strategies and Burlingame Transportation Engineering Programs Manager Augustine Chou, groups were formed around tables covered with area maps, to come up with a list of issues and concerns.  The group then tried to come up with solutions to those issues.  There was universal agreement on the desire for underground or a trench for Cal Train. There was a wide variety of issues that demonstrated that we cannot look at this project in a vacuum as is it will have many impacts throughout Burlingame.

    Regardless of our personal feelings about this issue, the fact remains that traffic will continue to increase from an already extreme 27,000 vehicles per day at this crossing and the number or trains is projected to increase from 98 today to 120 per day by 2020.  And if high-speed rail comes our way the number is projected to increase to 340 trains by 2030.

    There is no easy solution but this was a first step in opening the conversation about this tough topic.  The next meeting will take place in May and a final meeting is expected in November in order for City Council to approve a plan by early 2016.

    Grade separation meeting_0315

  • The Daily Post has an above-the-fold piece on Mike Scanlon's replacement at SamTrans.  We won't find out who or how much until the Board approves the offer and (I assume) the candidate accepts it.  That's fair enough since whoever it is wouldn't want his or her current employer knowing of their job search.

    The question is will the offer be higher or lower than Mr. Scanlon's $419,492 per year which the Post notes is "more than twice the $165,288 Gov. Jerry Brown is paid"?  Given how crucial the SamTrans chief exec is to High-cost Rail since he or she also runs Caltrain and the SM County Transportation Authority, Jerry may actually think that is OK!

    Samtrans Mystery CEO article

    CC-HSR put out this upbeat e-mail yesterday:

    The Atherton Environmental Lawsuit

    The Town of Atherton, also a long time opponent of the destructive High-Speed Rail project proposed for the Peninsula, has filed a formal challenge to the EIR certified by Caltrain in January. The proposed Caltrain project is a stalking horse for High-Speed Rail, and violates the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, the state's most important environmental law. CC-HSR has joined Atherton in this lawsuit. All we are trying to do is make sure that Caltrain complies with the law so that residents of the Peninsula are adequately protected. This is an important weapon in our effort to keep a destructive HSR project OFF the Peninsula. 

    Upcoming Peninsula Proposition 1A Lawsuit 

    Within a matter of weeks, we anticipate the filing of a major lawsuit against the Authority for its violation of Proposition 1A with respect to the Peninsula project. CC-HSR is planning to be a party to that lawsuit, and we expect others to join with us. Multiple new violations of Proposition 1A exist, and this lawsuit will be a powerful weapon to ensure that the strict requirements of Proposition 1A are observed, and that High-Speed Rail does not violate the integrity of our lovely residential districts, and our vibrant business centers.

    Good luck and Godspeed. 

  • The Daily Post had an interesting front page article yesterday titled "Mass transit ridership drops:  Despite billions in subsidies".  I'll just retype a couple of factoids that caught my eye:

    A new study by the Metropolitan Transportation Committee, or MTC, found that there has been a 3% overall transit ridership increase over the past two decades, but per capita usage of transit has dropped 14% since 1991, according to the San Francisco Chronicle.

    Bay Area residents took 1.35 million trips on public transportation on a typical weekday in 2013, according to the MTC study.  That is an increase over recession numbers, but it is still lower than peak ridership in 2001.

    The article points out that even new transit routes "clearly don't match where the jobs are going" and mentions that the campus-style business centers on the Peninsula are not linked to mass transit.  Newsflash:  our $69-100 billion dollar high-cost rail system will not do a thing to solve any of this.

  • Happy New Year  – 2015 to all the Voice contributors and especially to all the voyeurs.  I love meeting you out and about and learning that you read every thing on the Voice but you never comment.  You love the regulars who shall go mostly unnamed on this New Year's night.  You never tell me that you like the "think pieces" and few people comment on them, but….so what?  I like doing them a couple times a year, so here goes:

    The December 31st Wall Street Journal has a review of a book titled "National Security and Double Government".  I won't bore you with the essence of the book, but the reviewer did cull out an interesting facet.  The book describes the difference between the "Madisonians" who are cut from James Madison's cloth and "believed that the checks and balances of our republic rest ultimately on 'civic virtue"–an informed and engaged electorate" and the "Trumanites".  When Russ and I and a dozen others founded the Voice, in print–delivered to doorsteps, we went with the tag line that still sits at the top of the site– Dedicated to Informing and Empowering the Burlingame Community.  We were not thinking of James Madison but perhaps he was influencing us from above.

    The alternatives– the "Trumanites"–is the author's term for the unelected portion of our ever-expanding government.  No need to invoke his examples (suffice it to say Hollyroller has invoked them this week elsewhere on the blog), but I can think of numerous local examples.  The windbags at ABAG come to mind immediately.  The High-cost Rail Authority is a classic example.  Caltrain is another, to the extent they are just the High-cost Rail Authorities shoeshine boys.  I'm pretty certain the Cap and Trade ministers who are about to suck up the savings we have been enjoying on gas prices courtesy of the Saudis are another example.  I could go on, but you get the point.

    My resolution for 2015 is to keep shining the light on the Trumanites.  They are a problem and need to be controlled.  I have no illusion that just blogging about them will actually change things, but as I said at the top of the post–I like doing it.  In some small way it makes me feel better.  Happy New Year.  Enjoy.

  • You all count on the Voice to add the behind-the-scenes story and no where is that more true than on high-cost rail and Calectrification.  The Times ran a piece a couple of days ago that was pretty much a down-the-line echo of the Caltrain pitch.  It included this assertion

    Ackemann said Caltrain is committed to pursuing mitigation measures outlined in the environmental report. But the agency also says that, if the environmental report is challenged in court, it has the authority under federal rules to claim an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act. Ackemann said this is merely an option.

    "Caltrain has no option at this point but to move this project forward as expeditiously as possible," she said. "Right now many of our trains are running at 120 percent capacity or more."

    Electrifying the Caltrain corridor will allow the agency eventually to share the system with the California High-Speed Rail Authority, which has committed to spending $705 million on Caltrain's electrification as well as new signaling and train control systems.

    This CEQA issue has a number of well-informed citizens' eyes on it.  One of them notes the following:

    This is intentionally misleading, and designed to "hide the ball." As a commuter railroad not involved in the interstate transportation of passengers, Caltrain is NOT directly subject to the jurisdiction of the STB or the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA). Rather, it is covered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) which assists local commuter transportation agencies.. No one claims that the FTA  preempts CEQA's application of Caltrain's electrification project.

    But there are two possible bases for STB preemption of CEQA, each of which raises other problems for Caltrain which it would rather not mention:

    1. Caltrain's  electrification project is an integral part of the California HSR project (Caltrain swears it is not), or
    2. The use of Caltrain's electrified right-of-way by Union Pacific will involve transportation of freight involved in interstate commerce. (Caltrain and UP have not been able to resolve their differences over changes to the right-of-way, over which UP has virtual veto power.)

    The important take-away here is that it should be UNACCEPTABLE politically for OUR Caltrain to try to exempt itself from the California Environmental Quality Act, the most important environmental protection law for Peninsula communities. Why would we let OUR representatives on the JPB do this to our communites?

    So we will see how the hide-the-ball strategy plays out!  I hope our Council is keeping an eye on the ball.

  • I'm a little behind on my reading and viewing, but I do enjoy a few of the "reality TV" shows and record them for later viewing.  Back on April 22nd, the "Flip It to Win It" show on HGTV caught the eye of my eagle-eyed wife and me when a house came up for foreclosure auction in Sunnyvale.  On the show, the bidders go by and visit, but are really buying blind since they cannot go into the houses they are bidding on at the courthouse steps.  So this "Sunnyvale" house on Montana Way caught our attention because it was right on the Caltrain right of way and the video showed eucalyptus trees and oleander bushes as the train went by.  Don't get me wrong: Sunnyvale is a lovely town, but not as lovely as this clip showed.  Here is the house in Sunnyvale and the TV bidders.

    Montana Way2

    The house supposedly sells on the courthouse steps for $810K.  I repeat, Sunnyvale is a nice town, but….   By now the B'game antenna are up.  Sure enough this lovely TV couple are shown walking into the house they won and we see a Michael Brownrigg for Council  sign on the lawn behind them!  Too funny.  This little charmer is at 1038 Montana Morrell Ave. in Sunnyvale B'game!

    But wait, the story gets better.  The TV bidders say they budgeted $100K and 33 days to renovate this house and flip it.  I nearly spit out my pinot noir at their cluelessness.  Sure enough as the show progresses, they get caught for numerous lack-of-permit violations and the house gets tied up past the filming for the show so they cannot tout their profits and "lose" to another TV contestant.  Here is the house at the end of the show

    Montana Way3

    Our TV wizards are discussing how to cut their losses at the end of the show and are considering selling it without a kitchen as a second-round spec house.  Well, that didn't happen since the listing is still active seven months later here, but the finished kitchen looks lovely!  Seeing ain't believing these days.

    If anyone goes by the open house this weekend, let us know what you think.

  • I'm sure many Voice bloggers will recognize the title as a song reference to Yes' classic Roundabout, but if not, here is one verse to jog your memories

    I'll be the roundabout
    The words will make you out 'n' out
    I spend the day your way
    Call it morning driving thru the sound and in and out the valley

    It's been more than a month since I heard about the upcoming roundabout at the California Dr-Bellevue-Lorton Ave. intersection, but very little has been published about it.  Most locals would know the location as "Where Stacks is" and true local historians know it as Cannon Park after a long-gone cannon monument that used to be in the middle, grassy area.

    The City has been working on funding to construct a roundabout for some time and the latest round of Transportation Authority grants provided what turned out to be a winning opportunity.  You can read the staff report here.  With a million from one place and $200K from another this project is a "GO" and plans are being worked on now.  The theory is a roundabout will improve bicyclist and pedestrian safety.  The first pass at making that spot safer was the blinking crosswalk lights embedded in the asphalt leading to the Caltrain parking lot.  This is a much more dramatic 3-way attempt and will be our first roundabout.  I have been trying to think of another one in the Bay Area, but the closest I can come is the I-80 exit for Highway 89 into Truckee where there are a pair of new roundabouts.  Should be interesting to see how B'game drivers adapt.  Here is Cannon Park

    Cannon park2

     

    Here is a photo of the cannon that was in the park, posted with permission from the Burlingame Historical Society. It is from a 1920 Chamber of Commerce brochure.

    Cannon Park Cannon

  • We discussed a bit about the possible electification of Caltrain here.  It is a multi-faceted issue including the funding (trying to tap into non-existent High-cost Rail funding), the wires, the new trains (which would be longer and block more intersections around stations), but this being the Voice trees are always an issue.  The Daily Journal know B'game is tree-crazy too and had a piece while we were down that merits revisiting

    The Draft EIR estimates the project could remove up to 85 trees and prune another 154 in Burlingame. Mayor Michael Brownrigg said he was relieved to see none of the eucalyptus trees from the city’s beloved grove will be removed and only a few will be moderately pruned. However, he still needs to see a final report, Brownrigg said.

    and then there are other factors

    Although the (eucalyptus) grove seems largely out of harm’s way, the council wants the final EIR to specifically list which trees may be affected before the city gets on board, said Councilman Jerry Deal, who also serves as the vice chair of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board. Another concern is the loss of trees will also affect neighborhood aesthetics and decrease noise reduction for surrounding residences, Deal said.

    The Daily Post had a similar piece noting that Palo Alto's number was 177 trees and that the historic "El Palo Alto" may have to be pruned.  It is apparently 1,000 years old!  Back here in B'game, I am trying to imagine which 85 trees that aren't part of the Francard grove of eucs we are talking about?

    Caltrain fence

  • I'm not sure anyone saw this development proposal coming, as reported in the Daily Journal article

    The Summerhill Housing Group submitted its application for approval of a new 5.4-acre apartment and townhouse development at 1008-1028 Carolan Ave. and 1007-1025 Rollins Road. This is the current site of Burlingame Hyundai, Cammisa Luxury Cars, Enterprise Car Rental and other auto-related uses.

    The size is described as

    The site area includes 53.7 dwelling units per acre. Maximum height would be 63 feet for the apartments and 33 feet, six inches for the townhouses. Apartments would be five stories and townhouses would be two stories. There would be 268 rental apartment units and 22 townhouse-style units for purchase. There would be one to three-bedroom apartments and two to three-bedroom townhouses. Units would range from 696 square feet to 1,496 square feet for apartments and 1,507 square feet to 2,226 square feet for townhomes.

    When one is talking about 268 apartments and 22 townhouses, I am uncomfortable having a council member characterize what "the neighbors" think.  Having a lot of experience in this sort of thing, my bet is most of the neighbors don't have a clue yet.  And at that scale, aren't we all "neighbors"?  The developer's own website front page says "Building Communities of Distinction since 1976" and this does look like more than like a community than just a development.

The Burlingame Voice

Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026