Category: City Council

  • We covered the shortcomings of the historic City Hall here last September when the search for alternatives started.  As we noted then, a central downtown location is an intangible that is hard to value and harder to replace. Right on cue, staff is recommending a move around the corner to 1440 Chapin Ave–across the street from Mollie Stone's.  The move would involve two phases–a leased period followed by a purchase of the building and inheriting some of the existing tenants.  Per the Staff Report

    Pursuant to the Lease and Purchase Agreements, the City is required to purchase the building by June 30, 2027, for a price of $34,500,000. After the building is purchased, the City plans to retain existing tenants in office suites not occupied by the City, which will serve as a source of revenue for the City and offset some or all of the costs associated with purchasing 1440 Chapin. Revenue is estimated to be $1,656,000 per year from rental income.

    The city as a landlord could also extend to "the opportunity to collaborate with other public agencies, if they would like to lease space in the new City Hall."  The plan is up for discussion at tomorrow night's city council meeting and as these things go, I would think the deal is basically done.  Enough ground has been laid and there are enough short-tenured councilmembers that staff's say-so will suffice.  We don't have a Rosalie O'Mahony to issue a caution that would prevail.

    The real question is what of the current City Hall property?  The DJ piece raised the question, but the answer is "we'll figure that out later"

    Nearly 10 years ago, Burlingame had weighed the possibility of developing housing at the current City Hall site, though (Mayor Peter) Stevenson said conversation around the fate of the old building would be held at a future date.

    Engaged locals are already worried about the open space in front of city hall.  The holiday tree lighting is a classic B'game community event.  The pressure to flip it to a developer who would "stack and pack" it with a mix of "affordable housing" will be high.  Is there enough backbone to resist it and make the best use of the aging facility possible?  Are there potential tenants who don't need Class A space?  What about those "other public agencies"?  There is also a decent amount of parking on the site so if a Return to Office move is afoot for city staff, those spaces are a short, healthy walk to 1440 Chapin.  We shall see.  An eagle-eyed reader sent me the Instagram post about tomorrow's meeting.  I didn't know the city was posting there.

    City Hall purchase Instagram post

     

  • At this moment I'm sitting in West Maui, in the Kahana-Napili area, looking out at Molokai and Lanai while watching some video of the Pacific Palisades devastation.  A one-minute driving clip on X is eerily reminiscent of a clip from a local friend who was authorized to drive through Lahaina after the August 8, 2023 fire that killed 101 people.  A year and a half later one still cannot go into the center of Lahaina–Front Street.  Another friend got close this week and saw that some rubble is just now being bulldozed and hauled away.  In January of 2025.  Hazmat.  Insurance.  Cell service.  Coastal restrictions.  Equipment.  Cost.  All will be in play in LA, too.

    Oakland 1991 comes to mind.  Paradise, CA.  Chico.  Several more in remote parts of the Sierra.  It's on-going and fully predictable.  Joe Rogan relayed an LA firefighter predicting the exact magnitude of the Palisades fire his podcast last July!  I'm really hoping this old Voice post doesn't end up being another predictable concern come true.

    And of course there is the air pollution of each blaze.  The Merc notes:

    Massive plumes from multiple fires in Los Angeles County are choking the region’s skies and sending air quality to dangerous levels. Thursday morning Los Angeles had an AQI of 182, considered “unhealthy,” and currently among the worst in the world. The smoke was so dense that it was captured in satellite photos.

    Current forecasts through Saturday show most of the smoke from the wildfires wafting out into the ocean and making a weak return back to the coast as far north as Monterey.

    Tell me again how ripping out a high-efficiency furnace/water heater and a gas stovetop that gets a half hour of use most weeks is really important, but actually planning and executing wildfire prevention just never seems to rise to the top of Big Politicians priority list?

  • I love the hardcopy Daily Journal and Daily Post.  I search them out so much that my wife makes fun of me for it.  In B'game the DJ is easy to find, the Post not so much.  I won't reveal the few boxes in town where the Post can often be found.  Down in Palo Alto, the powers that be want to get rid of newspaper boxes on University Ave. in an effort to "beautify" the main shopping district.  The Post runs the ad below highlighting the threat to the First Amendment.

    The ad notes that Palo Alto already has a municipal code allowing the removal of unused boxes and there in is the rub in Palo Alto; and here in B'game.  I don't know if we have a similar code on the books, but I do know it's not being enforced.  Check out the line-up of boxes on Primrose.  A couple Epoch Times' boxes around town occasionally have the paper, but not this one that has no coin slot.  The beat-up maroon one next to it never has anything but trash and a lonely phone book or two.  It has siblings all over town in the same condition.  The red one might have been an SF Examiner box at one point, but Examiner boxes all over town have been empty for years.  This DJ box is filled daily as are all of them in B'game.  Thank you, guys, gold star!  This Post box hardly ever gets filled.  And there are other Post boxes in B'game that never get papers.  I don't think the City should be responsible for removing them–the companies should, unless they are out of business.  Then the City should take them to the trash heap.  Let's beautify B'game, one boxectomy at a time.  Candidates clutter the sidewalks across from Mints & Honey, in front of the Capuchino post office, along California Dr., and Mollie's sidewalk.  I could go on.

    P.S.  How funny is it to have three mailboxes lined up literally across the street from our sad little post office?  I bet they are a vestige of when we had the beautiful post office on Park Rd.  Let's yank two of those as well.

    News boxes on Primrose

    Post boxes in PA

  • Last night's city council swearing in and rotation session mimicked those of the past–and I've been to a lot of 'em.  Real locals who are invested in the community show up along with a variety of county pols and their support staffs.  The pols have varying levels of "investment" in B'game.  Speechifying happens–some good, some eh.  I will have a few posts to follow with more specifics about what transpired over the two-plus hours, but this photo I took before the proceedings proceeded says a lot about transitions.

    Pictured are the newly elected, first-time city council woman, Desiree Thayer, who was in chambers; standing in front of a screen with our longest serving council member, Michael Brownrigg, who was travelling and attending via video.  Times have changed.  The B'gamer on the street has always been a bit removed from who is on council at the moment, who is the mayor, and who is spearheading which issue.  District elections make it even less clear and convincing.  Desiree wins the seat with 1,259 votes.  I'll bet more than half of B'gamers can't ID their district rep–or even their district.  We have Sacramento Stupidity to thank for this maze, but on a classic night of swearing to the US and State Constitutions-"against all enemies Foreign and Domestic"–the mood was positive and even a bit traditional.  Here are Desiree and Michael "side by side".

    Someone Old Someone New
     

  • It's been two and a half years since the B'game city council voted 3-2 to install license plate readers in town.  You can read about Michael Brownrigg's and Emily Beach's opposed votes here.  Now we have stunning evidence of the wisdom of applying this technology in town.  As issued by BPD and repeated here in its entirety:

    On Saturday, November 2, 2024, at approximately 3:33 PM, officers from the Burlingame Police Department responded to a report of an attempted kidnapping involving an adult female near the intersection of Burlingame Avenue and Occidental Avenue. It was reported that a male suspect driving a dark-colored SUV approached the victim as she was walking. The suspect exited his vehicle, brandishing a black handgun, and ordered her to get into the SUV.

    The victim screamed for help as another vehicle passed which startled the suspect, causing him to flee the scene. A nearby witness heard the commotion and observed the suspect’s vehicle speeding away. This witness was able to provide a partial license plate number. Further investigation utilizing local Automated License Plate Reader cameras yielded photographs of the suspect vehicle and a complete license plate.

    At approximately 7:40 PM, with assistance from the Belmont Police Department, the suspect vehicle was located in the 500 block of O'Neill Ave in Belmont. An 18-year-old resident of San Mateo, found in possession of a black BB gun, was arrested and subsequently booked into the San Mateo County Jail for attempted kidnapping.

    The Burlingame Police Department urges anyone with additional information regarding this incident to contact the lead investigator, Sergeant Mike Bolanos, at 650-777-4142.

    That's four hours from incident to arrest.  What is not mentioned is that this attempt was apparently the second in a week or so by what is believed to be the same perpetrator.  The majority of Californian's have reached the breaking point on crime–small, medium and crazy dangerous like this one.  Prop. 36 is cruising to a win with a 70%+ margin even as our Gavinor claims it doesn't reflect our "California values".  Time for a gut check there.  But the craziness goes on.  Just last month this lawsuit was filed over Flock ALPR use in Virginia:

    A federal lawsuit filed by the Institute for Justice against the Virginia city of Norfolk, challenging the city’s widespread deployment of Flock Safety Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) cameras.  The lawsuit argues that the city’s installation of more than 170 cameras on public roads constitutes an unconstitutional, warrantless surveillance program that monitors every motorist, raising questions about digital privacy and government overreach.

    Some people have a very weird idea of what constitutes justice. 

  • We are in the home stretch of campaign season 2024 with two weeks to go.  It is another district-based election for city council with two of the five districts engaged in competitive races.  (Yet again, one district only has one candidate who wins by default).  As of September 3rd, the number of registered voters in each district is:

    District 1        3,889

    District 2        3,519

    District 3        4,157

    District 4        3,597

    District 5        3,900

    ————————-

    Total                19,062

    District 2 is where the action is at for city council with four candidates vying for the seat.  If we assume a couple of hundred additional registrations after 9/3 and 85% turnout, which is common in presidential years, it will probably mean a city council seat can be won with about 30% of the votes cast or about 950 votes.  Such is the effect of district elections foisted upon us by a Malibu lawyer exploiting a loophole provided by Sacramento.  Here's hoping the uncontested seats and small vote counts enlighten the state legislature to change the law.  A minimum population of 100,000 sounds like a reasonable floor.  Get out and vote!

    2024 Campaign signs

  • We have Elon Musk to thank for the moniker-of-the-year which is Woke Mind Virus.  It's simple to understand, widely applicable these days and gets the point across very efficiently.  It immediately came to my mind when I read the city e-newsletter announcement

    CIty Hall Holiday Closure

    CIty Hall will be closed Monday, October 14th, in observance of Indigenous Peoples' Day.

    It will reopen on Tuesday, October 15th, for normal operating hours.

    Yeah, no, sorry.  The second Monday in October is Columbus Day.  Here is some background that I provided four years ago when South San Francisco abolished Columbus Day.  It bears rereading for those with the Woke Mind Virus in B'game.

    If we need an Indigenous Peoples' Day, then we should find another day.  How about June 26th–Custer's Last Stand at The Little Bighorn?

  • Way back in the day we had two three local papers:  The Boutique & Villager-Independent, the San Mateo County Times and the Daily Journal.  They often endorsed different candidates providing fodder for the mailers to say "Endorsed by _____".  The last rag standing is the DJ, so voters who rely on their local editor and reporters for guidance now look only to the Daily Journal.  The DJ's endorsements this cycle are a bit light on detail but seem directionally sound.  Endorsing Donna Colson for D4 is a no-brainer.  I would go so far as to say the write-up understates her value to the council.  Beyond the "she listens to everyone with a smile" and " is not trying to please everyone" lies impressive energy–being out and about all the time–and "hard skills" in finance, regulation, electric service with PCE, labor relations, etc. etc.  The fact that she has token opposition gave her a chance to hit the streets and campaign hard anyway.

    District 2 is a real race with four candidates.  Nirmala is somewhat of a known quantity having run before, but the other three are newcomers.  I have interviewed Desiree Thayer and found her to be intelligent and dedicated–she claims to have attended every city council meeting for the last two years.  That alone is a big plus.  Her work experience resonated with me as showing skills that would benefit the council as well.  I would have liked to interview the others, but time is running out.  If it happens, I'll let you know.  In the meantime, some election information can be found on the city site here.  I'm also hunting around for the recording of the D2 candidates' forum from Wednesday night.  If you have the link, please post it in comments.

  • We touched on the move to replace our City Hall four months ago here and since then more details have been released on the state of the building.  Here are some of the key points from a presentation to the city council on Sept. 3rd.:

    • City Hall was built to the seismic standards of the time (1969) – Estimate is $10M
    • Mechanicals are beyond their useful life and parts availability is challenging (related asbestos issues estimated at $600K)
    • ADA accessibility is an issue
    • No fire sprinklers and inadequate fire alarm system
    • Lighting and electrical upgrades to current standards – estimated at $1.5M
    • The original roof is still on and being patched – replacement estimate $500K plus asbestos work

    All of that is compounded by an estimated 20% growth in the space needed plus some better meeting room space although this could be handled by a satellite, leased office.  The five-year total is $16M and grows to $35M over the next decade.  The idea square footage would be between 6,000 and 14,000 ft2 larger than the current space.

    Should the city choose to do the repairs and upgrades, it estimates about three years of temporary employee relocation.  That sounds like an optimistic guess to me looking at how long everything takes.  The real challenge is how to pay for either approach (fix vs. lease vs. build).  The current central location is excellent which is an intangible that is hard to value–and harder to replace.  There's no easy answer here even if one has a fix-it mindset.

The Burlingame Voice

Dedicated to Empowering and Informing the Burlingame Community


The Burlingame Voice is dedicated to informing and empowering the Burlingame community.  Our blog is a public forum for the discussion of issues that relate to Burlingame, California.  Opinions posted on the Burlingame Voice are those of the poster and commenter and not necessarily the opinion of the Editorial Board.  Comments are subject to the Terms of Use.


All content subject to Copyright 2003-2026