Editor,
Why is Burlingame asking property owners to approve an annual fee to overhaul the city's storm drain system? The 80-year-old system wasn't designed to last this long. The ancient pipes and culverts are collapsing. Past floods have caused serious property damage, cut off access by emergency vehicles and overwhelmed the sewer system, sending pollution into the Bay and making us liable for fines of up to $10,000 per day.
For a while, the city was able to put millions of dollars into shoring up the system every year, but that ended with 9/11, when revenues plunged $10 million and we began cutting basic services. Patching no longer works. The system needs a complete overhaul.
Due to the plummeting economy, we've cut $2 million from the current budget and another $2.3 million out of the 2009-10 budget. If the storm drain measure doesn't pass, we'll have to slash at least $2 million more each year to begin building a reserve to pay for the improvements. Meanwhile, construction costs go up at least $1.5 million every year.
But if homeowners pay an average of $150 per year, we can start fixing our storm drain system immediately. By law, funds will be spent only on storm drains, and a citizens' oversight committee will supervise the project. Individuals over age 62 with incomes under $35,500 can defer the fee until their property changes hands. The measure would sunset after 30 years.
The Burlingame City Council unanimously supports the storm drain measure, along with hundreds of local property owners. We urge you to vote Yes? on the ballot that will soon arrive in your mailbox.
For more information, visit http://www.protectburlingame.org or call 347-1717 or 558-7230.
Terry Nagel, Burlingame
The letter writer is a member of the Burlingame City Council.
(source: Daily Journal)
***
Much discussion about this measure at last night's council meeting as to the repercussions if this does not pass. (see Daily Journal article)
Interesting council meeting – Commissioners Auran and Cauchi will continue as Planning Commissioners (congratulations to them) and I am in awe as to how many meetings (not the frou frou ones) that some of our more hard working councilmembers attend on our behalf.
To borrow a phrase from "visitor" especially those "overburdened by both their responsibilities to the city and a full time job" who take the time to walk the neighborhoods, write letters, work on the phone banks, etc. amidst their "overburdened" lives.
– Written by Fiona